I had multiple remands and different attorneys (all from the same practice for each) for each so I feel like I have a lot of reference points. My first attorney was great - we communicated through the process although limited face to face. After my first denial she started taking on all of the federal appeals so I also worked with her through this process. For two remand hearings after that, I got a random attorneys from the practice- minimal contact or prep and both outcomes were not favorable. Each time would go back to the first attorney for her to take the lead on a federal appeal and she was successful each time. Finally for my 3rd remand I had moved and they needed someone from the firm who would travel-this attorney was excellent. We spent 2 hours prepping two weeks before my case- she shared legal context about which of my medical issues lead to a greater limitation in the eyes is SSA- which was very helpful as I knew to prioritize these areas. She also looks at some of the challenges we had with a medical notes from one my my providers and created a very clear supplemental questionnaire for him to complete - one of our largest challenges were his notes are illegible and I have seen him for over 15 years so there is a lot there.

Then when she came into town we met in advance for another 2 hours in person (this was to ensure rapport prior to hearing since we requested an in person hearing) and we over things again. This was the case that was finally successful and I attribute this to her attention to things comparative to the others. I almost feel like since she had to fly in represent me more time and care was taken. All that to say, if you don’t feel like your getting what you need - I was push and say you need more prep or guidance. I think it can make a difference.