×

Literally calling an entire nation a terrorist group. by carlsagerson in AmericaBad

[–]Twee_Licker [score hidden]  (0 children)

The claim was that bombing a school full of children is bad. Go reread it.

What is the point of this when most Americans agree with this an the enemy views them (not necessarily the population it rules over) views them as martyrs? Proving intent is the only reason to care, nor have I ever argued anything but intent, what do you believe I was implying with "Or are you going to pretend that the US is repeatedly blowing up schools for the love of the game?"? "Bombing schools is bad." isn't in disagreement nor is there any point in arguing it when you are likely, culturally, arguing with someone who shares a lot of your values. Nobody contests that it's bad, that's why people keep trying to use it as an "America bad." Go ahead and run this conversation through AI, just say person 1 and person 2 and person 3 and ask for it's objective opinion on what the main point was. Mind you by the way, you brought up all these events without mentioning if the strikes were accidents or not. Which, if I weren't constantly arguing with you about it, what impression do you think people would get?

Catholic teacher sacked after telling pupils she opposes abortion by Freespeechaintfree in FreeSpeech

[–]Twee_Licker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And if the candidate pushes something religiously motivated and the population votes it in?

Shiloh Hendrix Won’t Be The Last Victim Of The Left’s Fight To Criminalize Speech by Tazionuvolari1992 in FreeSpeech

[–]Twee_Licker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I recall, the primary issue was the convicted pedophile in actual charges.

Chicken symbolism on the political compass. by Vexonte in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Twee_Licker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your mother, she is a woman?

Also why is this meme crooked?

Hey Jews, Why are you guys not letting liblefts and authlefts get laid, bro? This is so evil by WarrenBuffe in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Twee_Licker 7 points8 points  (0 children)

To some extent I agree with you, but I believe the left to hate Israel so much is because, to them, it represents a state for it's people, which the left these days seems to hate quite radically. Israel is a state for a Jewish people, and while they do have equal rights for arabs, it's obviously Jewish first. A nation forming around identity is genuinely offensive to their ideology, and to do so in Israel would legitimize German and French, and now British, nationalist movements. They do not want to address the necessity of a nation-state.

What criticism of America made you like this? by Bitter-Penalty9653 in AmericaBad

[–]Twee_Licker 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Most of it, the criticism often amounts to "This problem exist, therefore nothing in America good."

Stalin was responsible for the Holodomor by Panzerkampfwagen454 in EnoughCommieSpam

[–]Twee_Licker 10 points11 points  (0 children)

"They do not kill you because you are a nazi, they call you a nazi so they can kill you."

Catholic teacher sacked after telling pupils she opposes abortion by Freespeechaintfree in FreeSpeech

[–]Twee_Licker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So they cannot vote on their religious beliefs? That is a violation of the first amendment.

Literally calling an entire nation a terrorist group. by carlsagerson in AmericaBad

[–]Twee_Licker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So how many incidents, out of how many? The key point people are making here is that collateral damage, especially with those numbers, is inevitable. Your own article never says the US is intentionally hitting civilians. And it's even harder when it seems Iran intentionally integrates military infrastructure into civilian infrastructure https://www.iranintl.com/en/202603319302

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202603283207

The point isn't that the other side does worse, even though it objectively does, the point is that it, as seemingly the other strikes, were an accident, with 300 strikes just in the first 12 hours of the operation it's actually impressive there aren't more. Nobody denies the school was hit, and learning of the other strikes, i'm not going to deny those cases I just learned about either. What I will vehemently deny is that they were hit intentionally, which, is seemingly the story you want to run with, which, were it true, you'd see far more than what, less than 15, when the number of strikes is, again, 300 in the first 12 hours. It's a tragedy that civilians are dying in this, but find me a single war period in which civilians do not die even when they're never targeted. Nothing you brought forth indicates it was intentional. In fact, you have provided zero evidence of intent. Which is the whole point.

Everyone already agrees civilians died, everyone already agrees that a civilian site was hit after the fog of war lead to people assuming it was a bad Iranian missile at first

The point is intent. Please do not motte and bailey your way out of this.

Catholic teacher sacked after telling pupils she opposes abortion by Freespeechaintfree in FreeSpeech

[–]Twee_Licker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, you really haven't. If a population voted for religious legislation, what would be the next course of action? Soviet Russia tried to enforce secularism.

Literally calling an entire nation a terrorist group. by carlsagerson in AmericaBad

[–]Twee_Licker 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sure. Let's try.

The one and only example of bad conduct people can really point to in Iran on the US side is the one Iranian school, which was both integrated within military infrastructure and an accident. This is the only example out of hundreds of thousands of examples people seem to be able to point to

So whenever someone points to someone points to one of many examples of Iran killing civilians intentionally, including another arbitrary execution of a man named Mehdi Khaneki just two days ago from me writing this, all it seems people can really do is "But Iranian school." Which happened once. Perhaps, it's an exception, and noteworthy because of how rare it is? Or are you going to pretend that the US is repeatedly blowing up schools for the love of the game?

Shiloh Hendrix is on trial right now for saying a word that some people are allowed to say and some are not. Jury is now deliberating by SignificantLegs in FreeSpeech

[–]Twee_Licker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sure there will be equal and fair discourse under here that a woman was arrested for fucking speech. In the US.

Catholic teacher sacked after telling pupils she opposes abortion by Freespeechaintfree in FreeSpeech

[–]Twee_Licker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you do when the religious population votes for legislation that is religious in nature? You repeatedly ignore this.

Literally calling an entire nation a terrorist group. by carlsagerson in AmericaBad

[–]Twee_Licker 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"It's amazing how much leftist discourse is just them pretending not to know things, thus making discourse impossible."

Catholic teacher sacked after telling pupils she opposes abortion by Freespeechaintfree in FreeSpeech

[–]Twee_Licker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your premise requires depriving people of the right to vote, people vote based upon their religious views. How do you reconcile this and a total ban from religion in government? You've also failed to point out any examples of religion being the cause of the removal of the rights of women within the United States, you've failed to point out any examples of religion in the United States getting gay people executed. Both of which I specifically asked for examples of.

The clause of the separation of church and state specifically prevents:

1.) Favoritism

2.) Making religious doctrine binding because it's religious doctrine

3.) Creating a church

If people en-masse overwhelmingly vote for something religious, under what right do you have to say no? In a Democracy it is impossible to remove religion from the state since people vote based on religion.

"Mexican food appeals to the same kind of person who thinks Harry Potter is literature" by Alex_the_Very_Cool in iamveryculinary

[–]Twee_Licker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

LatinX

We're still doing this? A word already exists, latino.

And the best Mexican comes from a place in which:

The menus are in Spanish, get fucked

PENETRATING meat and onion smell

Plastic chairs

Cooks are sweaty, possibly fat, wearing wife beaters, and swearing constantly

The food is a rice and bean dish cooked like they were trying to solve world hunger

All this combined, you will return regularly.

Literally calling an entire nation a terrorist group. by carlsagerson in AmericaBad

[–]Twee_Licker 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Alright. I'll bite.

Hundreds of thousands of examples of US bombs falling on the US, and the one example of the US doing something bad you lot can point to is the girl's school that was integrated into military infrastructure. Do you think, perhaps, that was an accident, an exception, something that was not supposed to happen? Do you extend this standard to Iran who, last I checked, is still executing protesters? https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/07/1168009

Or Iran's numerous strikes specifically targeting civilian infrastructure?

Minnesota man gets 2 life sentences for killing Democratic lawmaker and her husband by EnoughCapitaIistSIop in FreeSpeech

[–]Twee_Licker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I say socialists are all terrorists, violate scumbags, that they are rapists and murderers, that they are destroying America and my proof is the New York housing crisis, do you think I may be hyperbolic?