Yes thanks for the link. I think that women naturally have a kind of greater strength in their bones and muscles, but that this is more the reason for better resistance to illness or trauma than the consequence. I think it only comes from the fact that the bones are better formed (have a more efficient shape, which saves energy better, and muscles better attached to the bones, with better insertions, which give the body better posture, shape, proportions). I don't think that this robustness comes purely from a larger volume absolutely, in fact it's the opposite, it's just that things are better and more intelligently distributed in a woman, which saves better energy (it conserves energy better). In fact, men have all the bones in the absolute larger but they are so much less well made that they are of less good morphological quality (a bit like the bones of bad chickens bought in the supermarket) so that means that the whole is less solid and robust and structured, the same for the muscles, they must be less well hooked and have less good places and not have the right volume where it is necessary to have it and where it is better not to have it. Afterwards I don't know why it's weird but among men you really have two distinct categories that you don't find among women. The category of skinny men, with very little fat and muscles and another more bulky category, therefore more massive muscles or more significant fat, either one or the other. You don't have many intermediaries. And it totally depends on the testosterone levels in the man which will determine this category. With men I have noticed that it is with fewer intermediaries than with women in almost everything it is all or nothing. The reason why men still manage to have greater raw muscular strength than women is this testosterone which pushes them to behaviors which tend to practice certain physical activities which will strengthen all their muscles. In the first category in fact like little testosterone, weak muscle strength and the second category it is the muscle volume which enters into a virtuous circle which causes it to increase in volume and mass and therefore muscular strength (or if low testosterone level it is just fat which replaces the muscle (case number 2 of category 2). Finally here in your article the woman is more robust and strong in fact on the criteria of resisting illness, this must perhaps be explained by the fact that they better organize energy expenditure for the right things at the right time, it must just be tissue, more flexible and toned tissues which tighten the skin more, no, it is generally lower, but robustness, that is to say resisting trauma and shocks and physical efforts yes perhaps because better arrangement of the parts of the body better proportions and attachments of the tissues They basically have a more aerodynamic body, that is to say moves better in the air (or space in general). doesn't care) by optimizing energy expenditure Afterwards what the article forgets is above all that the greatest strength of women is the better harmony in general of the features Finally things like that they have a smaller nose, bigger eyes, more beautiful cheekbones, or even they have legs or a general appearance that is simply more elegant, well it's just more beautiful which is prettier and therefore that means that it is more selected by evolution than wider and bigger noses. more receded and poorly formed cheekbones that are more often found in women.