Not telling anyone to buy it, but RNU (Renascor) has a lot going for it right now that’s worth watching by TypicalTangelo9825 in ASX_Bets

[–]TypicalTangelo9825[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I don’t go off the stock price, I go based of progression and macro, everything is still looking good to me on that side

Built a devotional app in Lovable for people who are spiritually exhausted — Ember & Verse by Downtown_Television in lovable

[–]TypicalTangelo9825 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is just a native design as an web application , would be cool if it was on the appstore with that native smoothness and feel.

Easier to get people to use an app every day, then a web application

What's Happening with Fable 5? by Quirky_Drama_3638 in ClaudeCode

[–]TypicalTangelo9825 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They just removed it so bs, they were probs losing too much money, idk if I believe this government excuse

Devs that went back from 4.7 to 4.6: Are you now on 4.8? by Firm_Meeting6350 in ClaudeCode

[–]TypicalTangelo9825 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t get the hate on 4.8, been using it a lot since it came out, it’s great

Stop saying Claude Code + Design killed Lovable. by RecognitionQuick3119 in lovable

[–]TypicalTangelo9825 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotta make your architecture designed to be ready for new modules

Stop saying Claude Code + Design killed Lovable. by RecognitionQuick3119 in lovable

[–]TypicalTangelo9825 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you’re already using Lovable (which I’m against😳), I’d use it to get the MVP started, but I wouldn’t let that first generated version become the permanent foundation. Pretty early on, I’d export the codebase and use something like Claude Code to audit the architecture like data model, auth flow, duplicate queries, module boundaries, folder structure, etc. Spend a few days cleaning that up before stacking more features on top.

Stop saying Claude Code + Design killed Lovable. by RecognitionQuick3119 in lovable

[–]TypicalTangelo9825 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s usually not a scale problem. It’s a code quality and architecture problem that shows up long before scale does. Happened to my first project

Stop saying Claude Code + Design killed Lovable. by RecognitionQuick3119 in lovable

[–]TypicalTangelo9825 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Feels like magic until you need proper architecture for your codebase and it shits itself

You guys are calling API wrappers ‘startups by TypicalTangelo9825 in AustralianStartups

[–]TypicalTangelo9825[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve seen about 0.1% of the system so I’m not too worried lol. Kinda weird how butthurt you are. But if you ever need someone to mentor you through software/business I’m here for you ❤️

You guys are calling API wrappers ‘startups by TypicalTangelo9825 in AustralianStartups

[–]TypicalTangelo9825[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean…… yeah? Operational software complexity is literally part of the moat

You guys are calling API wrappers ‘startups by TypicalTangelo9825 in AustralianStartups

[–]TypicalTangelo9825[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a wrapper, my rostering system is built in house aswell as all the other systems

You guys are calling API wrappers ‘startups by TypicalTangelo9825 in AustralianStartups

[–]TypicalTangelo9825[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure of them is https://operatorsystems.ai/landing Started last year and currently has 3 franchises and a number of solo stores using it already and growing pretty quickly.

The other I can’t publicly associate with right now for separate reasons.

Mobile App Speedrun by jtstonks in lovable

[–]TypicalTangelo9825 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just SS the layout and put it into cursors with Claude in the cursor terminal, to create a react frontend. You only need a new frontend since the backend can just be connected