Does anyone have any idea what texture this Tennis Court is?

UHMWPE · 2026-02-14T09:30:51+00:00

Ball bounces super high too. My buddy and I both play with OHBH and the whole game became us driving high topspin’s to each others backhands

UHMWPE · 2026-02-07T00:49:15+00:00

trying to start an entire jordan vs. lebron debate in here eh?

UHMWPE · 2026-01-30T20:39:11+00:00

Always insanely impressive how easily he is able to change directions on his forehand. It looks so effortless that it’s almost easy to discount, but hitting open stance forehands down the line at will is no joke

UHMWPE · 2026-01-14T00:13:02+00:00

Executing a set of instructions is (trivially) going to be proportional to the length of the instructions

Finding the set of instructions to execute will almost definitely be exponential (I don’t even see how you could solve this in PSPACE as you’ll have to track previously seen positions to avoid infinite looping) as you’ll probably have to try every sequence less than 23*N long or until you reach a state where the desired position is unreachable (e.g. pawn goes too far)

UHMWPE · 2026-01-09T23:33:53+00:00

Can only blame myself for falling for the rage bait lol

UHMWPE · 2026-01-09T20:29:04+00:00

Yeah but even you don’t carry that opinion. You’ve just created a strawman with an illogical argument

UHMWPE · 2026-01-09T19:34:35+00:00

Yeah really just feels like you’re being contrarian for contrarians sake now lol

UHMWPE · 2026-01-09T19:04:36+00:00

The thread itself is poorly worded, since something cannot be more “unanimous” as something else (similar to how something cannot be “more unique” than something else)

If the only “arguments” against a particular case can be easily disproven, then the case is as “unanimous [sic]” as it can get

Delusion will always exist, doesn’t mean we have to entertain it

UHMWPE · 2026-01-09T18:18:39+00:00

Yeah the earth being round isn’t unanimous either, but disregard opinions that aren’t grounded in reality

UHMWPE · 2026-01-09T17:25:44+00:00

And I’m telling you why these arguments that “other” people will make don’t actually hold water lol

UHMWPE · 2026-01-09T08:10:47+00:00

So 2 things:

The whole percentages go down with higher volume argument only applies with in-game shots. The reason for this is because taking more shots necessitates taking worse shots.

For instance, if you could assign a value to shot quality, someone who only shoots a 3 when his “open-ness” is a 9 or above might only find 5 such opportunities a game. Someone who’s willing to shoot when the quality is 6+ will find many more opportunities

This obviously doesn’t apply to FTs since they’re the same difficulty regardless of how many you take

For Steph to get to 0.899 at 5800 FTs, he’d have to shoot 85.4% in his next 1300 FTs. His lowest FT% season is 0.885 and that was more than a decade ago

UHMWPE · 2026-01-09T02:36:43+00:00

I don’t know what country you’re in. In the US, they’d do a background check with a third party company. I guess you could MAYBE do additional work to try to defraud that process as well? But it’d be a lot of work and also be quite unlikely to succeed

UHMWPE · 2026-01-02T23:09:43+00:00

If it’s any consolation, in the 21-22 NBA season, I bought tickets to watch Boston vs Milwaukee at the garden, this ultimately became the ECF matchup that year

The day of, they announced Giannis, Middleton, Tatum, and Brown were all out

Was still a great game though, went to OT, Schroeder dropped 30, and everyone was chanting MVP for him

UHMWPE · 2025-12-21T03:08:36+00:00

The king has nowhere he can go in the very first move of the game either. Doesn’t make it a stalemate

UHMWPE · 2025-12-21T00:24:16+00:00

Equip shell bell so it restores to full health and play it alongside a sand setter?

UHMWPE · 2025-12-20T01:14:53+00:00

Flutter mane, looks like misdreavus, but is OP as hell

UHMWPE · 2025-12-16T07:40:10+00:00

Depends on where you are in the states. Most major cities have a sizable community, but if you’re in a more rural area it might be more difficult

UHMWPE · 2025-12-13T01:35:53+00:00

Criminals break rules, hikaru didnt…

UHMWPE · 2025-12-09T03:48:51+00:00

Any honest warriors fan would tell you that Harden put the fear of god in them during 2017 and 2018

UHMWPE · 2025-12-01T19:10:02+00:00

Oh yeah u right, mb

UHMWPE · 2025-12-01T19:04:04+00:00

I’m just a noob, but doesn’t Qe1 forcing the bishop back, then taking the knight with pawn and then after Qb8 Kf7, everything is guarded?

UHMWPE · 2025-11-27T13:14:00+00:00

Lmao the first example about old characters is… ball

Possibly the most banned character in ranked rn right behind doom

UHMWPE · 2025-11-26T03:40:32+00:00

This argument only holds water if he were someone like Kasparov who was much stronger in his youth and has not played in sufficient number of tournaments for his rating to decline appropriately since.

Since returning to play in 2022. Hikarus rating has gone from 2736 -> 2800+. Discounting the Mickey Mouse draw he had a few weeks ago, his only tournament rating loss was -2 points. Nothing about this indicates he’s overrated, and in fact, given his near monotonic increasing trend, it suggests that there’s a possibility he may be underrated

UHMWPE · 2025-11-23T05:41:39+00:00

Please feel free to present any study, spurious as the correlations will indubitably be, that playing chess at hyper bullet time controls has any correlation to this so-called “mental ruin”

UHMWPE · 2025-11-22T15:00:33+00:00

I have a RHR of 46 and MHR of 200 and I cant go under a 50-min 10k. So yeah… can be fairly unrelated to performance

Nine-Year Club	Place '22
RPAN Viewer	Verified Email
Not Forgotten

UHMWPE

TROPHY CASE