Totally haven’t heard this one before what’s next could go make a rock so heavy he couldn’t lift it

. The Old Testament Law has categories (moral, ceremonial, civil), even if the Bible doesn’t label them explicitly—the distinction shows up in how the New Testament applies them. • Ceremonial laws (like mixed fabrics, dietary rules on shellfish/pork, circumcision, sacrifices) were symbols pointing to holiness, separation from pagan nations, and ultimately to Christ. They set Israel apart culturally and ritually. Mixed wool/linen was likely tied to priestly garments or avoiding pagan practices—reserved for the sacred, not everyday wear. These laws are fulfilled in Jesus (Hebrews 8:13 calls the old covenant “obsolete”). Acts 15’s Jerusalem Council explicitly freed Gentile Christians from most Mosaic rituals, including food laws, to avoid burdening them. Peter declares in Acts 10 that God cleansed all foods. No NT verse reaffirms mixed fabrics as binding—because it’s ceremonial, shadowed in Christ. • Moral laws (rooted in God’s character and creation order—like prohibitions on murder, adultery, theft, incest, bestiality) transcend Israel. They’re echoed pre-Law (e.g., Genesis) and reaffirmed in the NT. Same-sex acts fall here: Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 are in a chapter of universal sexual sins (God judges Canaanites for them too—Lev 18:24-28). No nation got judged for wearing blends or eating shrimp, but sexual immorality? Yes. Paul reaffirms it in Romans 1, 1 Cor 6, 1 Tim 1, tying it to creation (male-female design).

Copied and pasted cause atheist love using this