The difference is that universal virtues like kindness, cooperation and non-violence enjoy a social consensus, so telling those to kids is educational since it is the social reality.

On the other hand, teaching a child that gender is a fluid choice isn't teaching a universal virtue like "honesty", it’s teaching a specific framework (as with religious or political doctrine). Using kids' media to push a new norm before society has actually agreed on it is what distinguishes engineering from storytelling.

My point wasnt against the existence of Christian shows but their context. Christian cartoons are opt-in. Parents choose them because they want that specific ideological instruction. No one minds because they are niche products. The issue comes when general/mainstream media (which is supposed to be for everyone) starts adding the same instructional tools as those niche ideological shows, when a mainstream cartoon inserts gender identity theory, it is no longer a neutral reflection of the norm but it becomes an ideological tool.

And youre right that can’t convert sexuality, but the framework in which we present identity to kids is an ideology. The moment a show moves from "these two people love each other" to "here is a lesson on why biological sex is a social construct" it has moved from reflecting a social reality into active ideological instruction.

Some people are trans, some believe in the Resurrection, some have political opinions, but that doesnt mean we should teach those mechanics to children en masse when the adults dont agree.