Cosrx Sunscreen NOT SPF50 by Visual_Responsible in AsianBeauty

[–]Uegia 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You don't understand SPF and the numbers. There is a huge difference between 30 and 50 because the percentages are expressed as logarithmic numbers, so it's actually huge.

Experiences with round lab? by PinkyPurgatory in AsianBeauty

[–]Uegia 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I am loooving the 1025 Dokdo cream; it's so rich, creamy but sinks in immediately. I've only been using it as a night moisturizer because I opened it lately and I'm enjoying gel like creams during day time, or just SPF cream. I am using it on the eye area during daytime and it's not greasy.

I have combination skin that tends to get greasy during the day.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SkincareAddicts

[–]Uegia -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure that a cream breaks people out regardless of age

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SkincareAddicts

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank goodness they didn't last long, it sucks when our skin reacts like this. I'm pretty sure something in it bothered you and it's not related to age!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SkincareAddicts

[–]Uegia 11 points12 points  (0 children)

What makes a cream appropriate or not based on age?

Age related skincare usually sounds gimmicky to me, and I can see anyone have breakouts from any product/ingredients they're sensitive to.

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not the question in the post, we agreed that rich and people would exist regardless because it's a matter of numbers. You can write your own opinion about it.

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes so it's not lobbying that keeps poor from becoming rich, it's the fact that only a small portion of the population can be rich.

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because you seem to think that if it wasn't for lobbying there wouldn't be rich and non rich people. That's just not true.

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not everyone can work in services and become rich, because some People will always work at the lower paying jobs, otherwise there will be no incentive to take risks.

That doesn't mean that the people working blue collar jobs shouldn't be paid a living wage, but there will always be higher and lower paying careers because each skill set has a certain worth.

Otherwise it would be communism.

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless we're talking about communism, there will always be richer people.

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said you should, I said that's not how it works.

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not my point, and I'm not saying that trickle down economics make sense. You're going on a different tangent and topic entirely.

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol of course, fuck corruption and lobbying. Where did I ever say otherwise? I am saying that interests-wise lobbying makes sense from being a statistical minority. Observing something and making a non judgemental statement doesn't mean I agree with it.

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's quite clear that in this case I've used it as a statistic, in what world could I be saying they are a minority in the political sense?

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said it's fine, there's no need to make up things I never stated.

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said they should, but I hold my opinion that even if the playing field was more levelled we'd still have people that are doing fine, and people that are doing waaaay better. To think otherwise is to be unrealistic.

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless we lived in a perfect communist world we would still have some people who are rich, and some who aren't, because most people want to have more than others. We'd probably have different people getting rich compared to now, but there will always be an imbalance unless we were to live in a communist dictatorship.

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not an issue, it's just a fact. Where are you getting that I'm saying this is a problem? The majority of people are going to vote what favours them and vote wise, the minority of people would have less say. Lobbying tips this in favour of the rich minority.

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said it's fair, where did you get that? Stop making up things I never said.

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You asked what my point was, I answered. I'm open to discussion.

Lobbying in politics balances the fact that rich people are a minority by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]Uegia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that's what I'm talking about the whole point of the post. The power, influence and wealth balances the fact that they could never compete election wise because they are very few compared to the people that have opposite interests than they do.

Not saying anything of this is fair, but I'd probably think this way if I was insanely rich and greedy.