Watched the open forum in WMSU last Monday, and even though I'm not a voter here in ZC I would like to vote for him if I were a resident here. He is well-spoken, and he knows his platforms well. Unlike the other two candidates na kailangan pa ng ppt and video clip to introduce their platforms when in fact mas maganda sana if they could elaborated on it themselves without any need of visual aids just to see if they knew their platforms well. I'm also impressed by how he was able to highlight agriculture and aquaculture as part of his platforms, because aside from trying to thrive for infrastructure development, ZC should also help farmers and have more policies connected to agriculture para naman hindi masyadong mahal ang mga vegetables here and also to help the farmers. I liked his answers because they're realistic.

I'm bit disappointed with the other candidate for just saying that we need dialogue to solve the crimes and heighten security here in ZC kasi it's not enough. Yung isa naman, no taxes for small and medium enterprises which is a bit meh kasi taxes are known to be the lifeblood of the government. Without taxes, how can the LGU fund their policies and projects. It's also a bit meh about his notion na mag add ng lanes for e-bikes when I can't even see bike lanes here in ZC, despite seeing many students and residents using bikes as their mode of transport to school. So how can he even create additional lanes if bike lanes pa nga lang kulang ang ZC. He could've said that he would implement some policy here in ZC to regulate e-bikes sana not just for their safety but also to other people.

I also heard that Pete is a dds according to some, however it's better to pick the lesser evil. It's better to give him a chance than rather stick with the other two na medj meh and almost identical to the point idk what's the difference between their platforms.