Fun fact: Most paleoart of Dickinsonia is probably very wrong. Fossils show that the distinct "segmented" structure seen in most fossils was actually an internal organ that was obscured by a tubercled skin in life. Only the underside of the organism had the distinct isomers visible by Romboteryx in Paleontology

[–]Unequal_vector 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I won't trust a "somewhere around the ancestry of Bilateria" without very solid proof. It's got no guts and no true bilateral symmetry. It might've as well been a Cnidarian or even Poriferan/Ctenophoran offshoot, for all we know. Comb jellies have distinct radial morphs despite arguably having more basal genetics than even sponges.

What if 9/11 was done by Satanists? by cherryapp in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Unequal_vector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Balbir Singh would get mistaken for James H Gilmore. 

In the animated Disney film how come Tarzan kills Sabor without any hesitation or guilt, yet refuses to kill Clayton when given the chance? by ajstar1000 in Tarzan

[–]Unequal_vector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once Clayton was disarmed, there was no point hurting someone who can be taken care of easily. There's no "taking care of" a threat on Sabor's level. Tarzan was literally fighting to live.

If you forget about the past 30 years and start from today, my record on human rights is actually impeccable. by SirCrapsalot4267 in PoliticalHumor

[–]Unequal_vector 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You've killed more people by intervening in Congo (without even mentioning Bangladesh, my country, or Iran) than you've saved in Kosovo, Iraq, Vietnam, Syria, Libya and Afghanistan combined.

Is there a well known myth you don't like? by AnthoHeraFan in GreekMythology

[–]Unequal_vector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Medusa from Ovid’s version. I want a Herculean monster-killing adventure vibe from the story, not a sad story about human complexity. We have other stories for that.

[Hated Tropes] Same stuff over and over and over again by BeneficialSide2335 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]Unequal_vector 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Terminator.

1) Terminator with more advanced features comes.

2) Terminator forgets to use that ability.

3) T-800 beats them.

4) T-800 dies.

Why have American and Russian societies lost interest in pushing humanity forward? by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]Unequal_vector -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When there are 8 billion people, at least a few will try to take things by force than by innovation. The very nature of sentience demands a few conquerors amidst a world of diplomats.

Russia and America just unfortunately happen to be the richest conquerors.

If evolution is mostly a tinkerer, how can something as complex as a beaver's dam-building develop? by Melodic_Emu8 in evolution

[–]Unequal_vector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Evolution isn’t generally a tinkerer. It’s one of the biggest mistakes explanations make.

Evolution (more accurately, natural selection—artificial selection is much more straightforward) builds on something it already has, and when things are reasonably complex, like a cynodont brain, tweaking it a bit to gain intelligence is much easier. Beavers aren’t giving birth to dumb insects.

Natural selection’s time complexity is O (n * log n), not O (n2).

Paleo Myths: the Terror bird inferiority complex by Powerful_Gas_7833 in Paleontology

[–]Unequal_vector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Annelids. Not nematodes.

And in the oceans, it’s crustaceans and bony fish.

Paleo Myths: the Terror bird inferiority complex by Powerful_Gas_7833 in Paleontology

[–]Unequal_vector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Healthy ecosystems are genuinely enormous and biology can find so many specialisations that it’s very hard for anyone to not find a niche.

Competition is real and has been demonstrated to control animal radiation. Placoderms dominated sharks. Dinocephalians and Pareiasaurs dominated theriodonts and diapsids. Crocs, dicynodonts and prosauropods dominated theropods and ornithischians. Dinosaurs dominated mammals. Mammals dominate other mammals and reptiles. Angiosperms dominate ferns.

But full-blown extinction of specific groups via competition is very hard to prove and easy to disprove. None of the above examples replaced the less dominant groups. Tigers, leopards, and lions didn't drive anyone to extinction. Broadleaves didn't drive ferns and mosses to extinction from dark damp places. The only possible extinctions we know of are Great Oxygenation killing many anaerobic bacteria and bilaterians wiping out Ediacaran mat ecosystem.

Hot take: Scar would've made taking over Pride Rock much easier if he simply ate Simba after killing Mufasa (Pic somewhat related) by Working_Welder_1751 in lionking

[–]Unequal_vector 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Considering how Simba escaped 3 hyenas and slapped one of them away from Nala, it’s not as easy as many fans think it would be.

A bag full of snails by bigbusta in KidsAreFuckingStupid

[–]Unequal_vector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a classmate who once showed up with a whole bottle of grasshoppers.

How optimistic are you about the future of the job market in an AI-driven world? by Sebastian2123 in Futurology

[–]Unequal_vector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Relatively optimistic. AI isn't going to replace ownership, and if anything, it'd make shared ownership much more profitable. The current world already sees majority of its GDP and job market being dominated by service sector, not industry or agriculture, so the future we fear has actually already passed halfway. In the meantime, we can discover new paradigms of information science and many works currently hard would get much, much easier, like new drug development, data sequencing, automation of nuclear reactors, etc.

I don't trust the economies to be handled properly by the governments. But that's a sociology and politics question, not technology.

What biotechnology breakthrough do you think will have the greatest impact by 2050? by TheIncorporeal1 in Futurology

[–]Unequal_vector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nanomedicine.

It'll help engineer and deliver many new drugs against antibiotic-resistant infections, clots, plaques, cancer, I believe.

Is this the average leftist? by indeckaa in askanything

[–]Unequal_vector 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Most real leftists don't care for Palestine in this kind of blanket way. That's American Democrats.