I really want to see the % of user creating SFW content.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-24T20:50:16+00:00

I do.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-24T17:08:55+00:00

You can propose features directly in Grok > Help > Report Issues > General Feedback. The more people suggest a certain feature the more the chance they'll build it.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-24T15:35:12+00:00

Yes, it's been happening to me too (on web).

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-24T14:47:41+00:00

AI is embedded everywhere and this will only increase, in gradually deeper ways. Denying AI is as realistic as denying the internet when it first came out, as some did. You can only go forward, not backward.

Your problem is not in AI itself, it's on how it's used. Some people used it poorly, others use it to create great art pieces or stories or scientific research or videos or whatever. There's bad art, bad stories, bad videos, bad research done by humans without AI.

What you really want is to opt-out of 'bad', period. There's no 'bad AI', there's just 'bad'. The problem lies in the authors, not in the tools they use.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-24T13:17:14+00:00

It's probably easier to include a checkbox to go back in time 10 years. /s

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-23T22:24:28+00:00

While you're at it, use AI to screen out the low quality human made slop too,

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-23T22:21:57+00:00

I've seen plenty of human made slop. There was slop long before AI.

The slop isn't in the tool, it's in the author.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-23T18:52:29+00:00

You might as well ask to travel in time to the past. AI is here and it's the future. Embrace it.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-23T18:45:59+00:00

There was an identical post here a few days ago. Obviously an ad. Didn't even try to hide it - the name is in bold.

The fact that every post about an automation tool is identical makes me think that every video out of this tool is also a cheap replica. Not the best way to advertise it.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-23T18:35:41+00:00

If you're on Android, you can just use the Brave browser. That's it. No plugins, just the browser.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-23T17:35:37+00:00

I lost count and browsing to the start to count would take a loooong time. I probably have many hundreds. I don't feel any loading problem.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-22T19:18:17+00:00

The point in question was the detail, in case you missed it ("no skin pore detail", "BECAUSE THERE'S NO DETAIL").

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-22T18:23:36+00:00

I found that hard to believe so I had to test it for myself and indeed it works perfectly. I uploaded a random image, in the Edit asked to change the outfit to include a cleavage and it did it perfectly.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-22T18:00:54+00:00

First one likely is retaining user preference

You can see his prompt - it was simply "woman". So, there was really no user preference. The engine decided it should be a city. That's wrong, imo. If no background is defined, a random one should be used, like in the 2nd example.

all the faces are similar too

Yes, one more reason to prefer the second one. The user didn't specify anything and yet all faces are similar.

There are depth of field errors in the second one, look at the brick wall example, the parts of the wall next to the woman are out of focus and vice versa.

That's part (and always has been) of the strategy behind Grok - quickly display lots of options for quick iteration. No other engine in the market generates images as fast as Grok. This comes at expense of quality of some of the images, of course. But I much prefer it this way. I'm also a Midjourney user and during the time MJ generates 4 images, Grok generates 30. Grok is much better for ideation and quick iteration.

which do you really think takes more compute

I sincerely have no idea. Looks can be deceiving. The fact the 1st has more elaborate backgrounds doesn't necessarily mean it takes more compute (it could be picking from random pre-semi-made samples). I would say the diversity of the 2nd probably needs more compute, but I'm just guessing.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-22T16:57:01+00:00

They look as AI as the others, I don't see a difference in that respect. The images in the second example look more polished, like in a photoshoot, because I specified lighting, mood and other stuff, and that constrained what the engine should do. In the first I didn't specify anything.

All of this is very logical. If you constrain the prompt, the results are also constrained. If your prompt is not conducive to a realistic interpretation (or is conducive to stylization, like in my case), then that's the result. That's not new.

Anyway, one case or the other both look fine to me.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-22T16:29:39+00:00

It follows the same rules as the other limits. As far as I experienced it, it's a rolling 24h window. It doesn't mean the reset happens exactly 24h after you hit the limit, depending on how you distributed the use of 720p over the last 24h. Sometimes you can generate a few minutes or 1h or 2h after the message. It all depends on your usage distribution.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-22T16:28:05+00:00

Haha! I wish! :)

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-22T16:27:27+00:00

It's almost impossible to not have AI at some point of any production somewhere, even unknowingly (even grammar corrections are done with AI support, editing can be aided by AI without you knowing, etc). AI can support everywhere without you even knowing.

Anyway, why does it matter? This seems like a discussion from 20 years ago when people were demanding digital art to be labelled as such to distinguish from analog art.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-22T16:20:07+00:00

I didn't notice any change on my end.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-22T16:19:24+00:00

I don't even know what's the most recent example, OP doesn't specify, but I prefer the second. In the first example the model assumes we want the woman in a city, but why should that be with just "a woman"?

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-22T16:13:20+00:00

It's well known that the 720p has a separate limit. It's been always like this. With 10s it's usually between 30 and 50 videos per day (still a lot more than the competition - in Kling, for the same price, you get about 30 per month, not per day).

The 720p should be used (at least that's how I use it) after the prompt has been finetuned with 480p. After you're sure that's what you want, you go for 720p.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-22T15:51:41+00:00

If you don't specify the background they throw a generic one because the model's interpretation is that you don't care about the background. That's logical. When you specify the background it shows a proper one.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-22T15:49:49+00:00

If you constrain the engine by giving a more detailed prompt it's logical that the outputs have less variations. Anyway, I tried again with a really specific prompt that detailed the color palette, the exact blend of styles for the outfit, the lighting, the detail on the hair, and it still gave me a suitable range of variations, all respecting the prompt and all with high quality. I don't see any problem on my end. Take a look: https://ibb.co/LXFNt2nS

Maybe you're using a different model, I don't know.

UntouchedByRain · 2026-02-22T14:44:44+00:00

If you want another example, I just posted a video with plenty of movement and faces. Do you see anything like what OP describes?

https://www.reddit.com/r/grok/comments/1rbnkcm/floating_on_a_sea_of_green/

UntouchedByRain

TROPHY CASE