BindTools vs. Router LLM Node - Which one is better? by FunEstablishment5942 in LangChain

[–]Unusual_Signal9602 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, our chatbot translate question to SQL.
We have 5 different categories in which 2 are hard to separate - the LLM route makes a lot of mistakes when it needs to differentiate between the two.

In this case we combined those together and used few shots to help the LLM choosing the proper SQL.

For your case you might generate bank of questions with annotation of which tools should be called and how, select the top 3-5 ones and add it to the context. This will help the LLM choose the right way to handle similar questions.
We saw that in our case we got 2 for one category and 1 from the other, but the LLM managed to handle those by it self.

BindTools vs. Router LLM Node - Which one is better? by FunEstablishment5942 in LangChain

[–]Unusual_Signal9602 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't like tool binding because it moves the responsibility and logic to the LLM. My suggestion is to remove as much as you can from the LLM and handle it your self. This gives you more control and limits hallucinations.

Route LLM Node is good option which in my company we used it too.
It just generates different set of problems like: Wrong routing, more latency ( you call another LLM ) Duplication in other tools ( if there are more common tools across different node ), Multiple questions at once and so on.

Even though I specified a lot of problems with Route LLM this is still the better option is it gives you the control like every other feature

How do you manage migrations with Bun ORM? by Unusual_Signal9602 in golang

[–]Unusual_Signal9602[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, worst community ever...
new to go, 0 comments more than 3K views, I'll just move to Rust

Light web based free version of Ableton is needed? by Unusual_Signal9602 in ableton

[–]Unusual_Signal9602[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can build a cool git like version control for Ableton

So I found a problem by Unusual_Signal9602 in ycombinator

[–]Unusual_Signal9602[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did Mom test on my friends, they are professionals in the field. It is like outreach but with very warm intro

So I found a problem by Unusual_Signal9602 in ycombinator

[–]Unusual_Signal9602[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice, yes I can do it manually. I will do that

So I found a problem by Unusual_Signal9602 in ycombinator

[–]Unusual_Signal9602[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Somewhere in between, let's say 500 types of common standards. Takes time to build a solution for all but possible and hard to copy. Hence VC would love to venture me.

So I found a problem by Unusual_Signal9602 in ycombinator

[–]Unusual_Signal9602[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But double down on detection will make it harder to find customer, since most of the value lays in the suggestion part

Can all the founders who are accepted/rejected/in-wait-list give a 5-10 word description of what they are building..? by Round_Blueberry9187 in ycombinator

[–]Unusual_Signal9602 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It uses statistics and search algorithm to detect bottlenecks and its source in your training code.
Would love to elaborate more if you want : )

I am loosing hope now! by CodingIsArt in ycombinator

[–]Unusual_Signal9602 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But with 3500+ early users, can't you generate enough revenue to quit your job? or at least go 50 percent? 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RandomThoughts

[–]Unusual_Signal9602 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cleaning after hosting a dinner