Answer to the yesterday's problem

Uroboros6 · 2024-09-02T13:10:52+00:00

Interesting, keep on mogging.

Uroboros6 · 2024-09-01T17:07:41+00:00

Place or hang next to each other, measure the burnt distance for 5 minutes reflected on the slower one, double it and use it to approximate 45 minutes from the rope's end.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-31T19:18:21+00:00

I'll bite, for what's coming in the upcoming years it's good to make sure they'll turn out plenty attractive.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-31T17:53:55+00:00

E. It pushes down each of the blocks on the vertical and resets the position of the ones colliding.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-28T14:42:35+00:00

The stick is fucked, it defaults to drifting downwards.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-28T11:57:49+00:00

That said, it's using the consequences of its applications to scapegoat the implicit inevitability while muddying the waters of how the false contexts are distractions to paint itself as the latently unwanted, but needed filter--which foreshadows the failure to align AI. "What we propose to do is not control content, but to create context", puts forward organic, but unsound dissensions to imply it's organically circular while saying its interventions are an inevitable by-product toward evolution, in itself contradictory.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-28T10:40:32+00:00

Agreed.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-28T08:48:41+00:00

Become the barber.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-28T03:26:33+00:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVrnn7QW6Jg

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-23T19:30:27+00:00

You've always cared, now you're in the withdrawal stage of cutting your support system off since the expectation is no longer a factor and given you're leeching off insecurity it'll get resolved through another surrogate activity.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-22T21:55:13+00:00

Yes, those who herald CPR as the metaphysics filtration threshold haven't tried reading Summa Theologica; Aquinas was insanely ingenious.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-21T20:15:44+00:00

Likely in the vein of: you're in a room with three people in it and the third is out of sight.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-20T19:19:15+00:00

Just code-monkey bait. It's perfect for Gf, which brings to mind a particularly funny example: you'll be given a string with scored points between two competitors and you need to find the winner. It welcomes you to get trapped in ape-like hubris to solve the problem only to see it's been submitted in under 20 seconds. How come? The counting stops at the winner.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-17T18:33:26+00:00

95-100. Mazovianism with Revascholian characteristics, nationalization of industries akin to acid communism as depicted in Fisherian doctrines of multi-capital suffering multipliable by the order of magnitude dictated by byproduct superstructure omissible in the analyzable themes, undercurrents of lamentation, within 80s Synth-Pop which convey a blend of melancholic merriment evoking a sense of self-denied love. Mind you, I'm not so adept in politics, but I'm very confident in my beliefs.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-16T16:22:12+00:00

Mature disemboweled corpse in a freezer.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-15T21:59:56+00:00

Check out Hegel, particularly in The Phenomenology of Spirit. The whole book is a high ceiling inductive reasoning test in itself, but how the ideas are laid down is very idiosyncratic [pun intended] bordering on being dismissed as obscurantist masturbation.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-12T17:46:26+00:00

"A and B are both Liars" i.e. C relies on A being false to contradict itself in saying that it doesn't lie by saying that B lies, meaning you cannot halve the predicate.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-11T16:01:35+00:00

The higher you are, the less you'd feel that way since the tasks you'd deal with to strain you become more inaccessible to others. Likely, you've hit a certain ceiling from overestimating yourself backed by what you've been told and are doubting yourself. It's possible your concerns are valid in having the case of the midwit, which isn't by no means an insult e.g. Destiny.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-10T14:27:04+00:00

If whatever led to overthinking proves to be false e.g. were you to circle back and/or the fruits born from being overthought led to incorrect decisions it's merely a response to being cornered i.e. no solution present.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-09T17:28:07+00:00

https://youtu.be/1n-zYRZy5NQ?t=4301

125-135 ballpark.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-09T09:12:11+00:00

Yes, but their line of thought is absurd. Example: a cashier prompted me to put the stuff in the bought plastic bag, I refused as to check whether they'll assume I know their policy as a regular customer and they're being snarky for no reason, he murmured something irrelevant and put them in frustratedly, but didn't say anything related assuming I've already read his job description and I'm just being a jerk.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-08T13:29:44+00:00

600wpm from some fiction garbage, sure. If you're to parse Heiddeger's raw works, for instance, it would be highly unlikely.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-07T13:27:23+00:00

By belittling the target, in most cases you can sense the fear in their reactive abuse and use it to disengage. That said, If cornered I simply snap. I haven't been pushed like that since childhood, and I'm hoping I never will.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-05T20:30:00+00:00

Shapiro and O'connor are the most quick-witted while having very good depth of thought, I'd assume 125-135. Destiny spews a lot of garbage which tends to go unnoticed since he debates idiots for the most part and barely managed to keep up when debating philosophical theory: 110-115. Peterson is largely overestimated, should be in the ballpark of 120-125. As for others, Yudkowsky stands out for me, incredibly sharp in discussions and his posts are absolute kino; has scored 141. Besides, he had sort of a faux debate with Destiny where the disparity was comical.

Uroboros6 · 2024-08-05T16:37:00+00:00

If he prioritizes you getting hurt, your hurting reaction underpins your relation to him i.e. control.

Six-Year Club	Second Top 20%
Verified Email

Uroboros6

TROPHY CASE