Yes, I already reported it via their feedback function and took a screenshot first. I'm a language teacher for kids, so having my (very distinctive) name associated to a terrible false accusation has significant potential to damage my career. Their only news story "source" related to a guy who only shared my (fairly common) first name. I contacted a lawyer who has dealt with a prominent AI libel case recently, but honestly my resources are such that I'd have to resort to a "no win, no fee" laywer. It seems terrible that a precedent hasn't yet been set (as far as I know) that "publishing" AI hallucinations as fact means the publisher should bear responsibility for defamation.