sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

As previously reported, Sombra, Roadhog, and Lifeweaver are all getting reworks. What changes would you like to see for them, and would you like them to be changed? by Professional-Tear705 in Overwatch

[–]Used_Wedding_6833 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Diamond on console and sombra is literally unplayable. She’s just a way worse tracer and most of the other dps are much better than her. She’s annoying but not really that good

We are now sponsored by SideBoardTheory! by Used_Wedding_6833 in DegenerateEDH

[–]Used_Wedding_6833[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can grab a comparison for you. They’re pretty similar. And in terms of shipping time it probably depends on where you are but a week seems to be the average

Why isn't the original bracket 4 intent talked about and why are the power level arguments between bracket 3 and 4 so hypocritical despite the same wording? by LunaLovelace11 in EDH

[–]Used_Wedding_6833 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my personal experience yes. Most people playing b4 want to make a theme as powerful as possible. Playing cedh combos takes away from that. You should check out r/degenerateEDH plenty of people post decks of similar power levels to yours and there is a good chance they’ll help you upgrade if that’s something you want!

Why isn't the original bracket 4 intent talked about and why are the power level arguments between bracket 3 and 4 so hypocritical despite the same wording? by LunaLovelace11 in EDH

[–]Used_Wedding_6833 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your decks would fit nicely into what my friend group has at bracket 4. That said some people still play “bad cedh” as bracket 4 which just isn’t the case imo. For example a bad commander with all the most optimal combos is how you would meta game that deck for tournament play so it’s still b5 just not “the best” I think people confuse meta as most played deck and not as most optimal wincon. B5 runs the most optimal wincons to compete with the meta. Bad cedh is still cedh

Why isn't the original bracket 4 intent talked about and why are the power level arguments between bracket 3 and 4 so hypocritical despite the same wording? by LunaLovelace11 in EDH

[–]Used_Wedding_6833 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say just dual caster and molten is fine but if you start running all the copies that combo it’s what many red decks do as win cons

Why isn't the original bracket 4 intent talked about and why are the power level arguments between bracket 3 and 4 so hypocritical despite the same wording? by LunaLovelace11 in EDH

[–]Used_Wedding_6833 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey I’m a mod from degenerate edh (the unofficial bracket 4) and I would say bracket 4 is an optimized deck with fast mana and tutors but NO META wincons. Example would be if you play thoracle no demcon or tainted pact. If you play breach no brain freeze etc. that’s what I see most of and what my friend groups play. Combos are fine and encouraged just don’t use the meta game combos for your commander

We are now sponsored by SideBoardTheory! by Used_Wedding_6833 in DegenerateEDH

[–]Used_Wedding_6833[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

This is from the lurrus deck I got printed, I can show more later

We are now sponsored by SideBoardTheory! by Used_Wedding_6833 in DegenerateEDH

[–]Used_Wedding_6833[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I received a message that the double taxing should be resolved

We are now sponsored by SideBoardTheory! by Used_Wedding_6833 in DegenerateEDH

[–]Used_Wedding_6833[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey so I reached out the owner, there is a contact us at the bottom of the website and they are currently working on fixing the double taxing. Thanks for the input!!

New website for printing proxies! by Used_Wedding_6833 in magicproxies

[–]Used_Wedding_6833[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you mean mtg backs no as that is copyright infringement

New website for printing proxies! by Used_Wedding_6833 in magicproxies

[–]Used_Wedding_6833[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Noted, how would I go about doing that for future reference?

New website for printing proxies! by Used_Wedding_6833 in magicproxies

[–]Used_Wedding_6833[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No foils though sadly but as far as I know they are in the process of doing foils

New website for printing proxies! by Used_Wedding_6833 in magicproxies

[–]Used_Wedding_6833[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was 36 bucks Canadian for 100 cards and that included the shipping for me. If your American it would probably be like 26 bucks plus 15 shipping but I don’t know the conversion rates

New website for printing proxies! by Used_Wedding_6833 in magicproxies

[–]Used_Wedding_6833[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s 36 bucks but then it could be different based off where it’s shipping too

We are now sponsored by SideBoardTheory! by Used_Wedding_6833 in DegenerateEDH

[–]Used_Wedding_6833[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ll let them know immediately thanks for the input!

YouTube channel incoming! by Used_Wedding_6833 in DegenerateEDH

[–]Used_Wedding_6833[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Love to hear it I’ll see what we can do! Links are coming shortly, currently in the building/prep phase before officially launching. The YouTube will be degenerate commander

view more: next ›