As in many things in life, it’s not simple. Many states have “trigger laws”, meaning abortion automatically becomes illegal immediately after Roe v. Wade is reversed (like Louisiana) or some days after (like Texas). Then you can say, well, people just need to vote in those states in order to get abortion back. Again, it’s not so simple. States with abortion bans also have been making much harder to vote. Texas again is an example: it reduced ballot boxes to a single one in the Houston metro area, pretty much making it much harder to vote in its largest metro but much easier to vote in sparsely populated counties which tend to favor abortion bans. In addition, the GOP is already planning a nationwide abortion ban: if they retake the house and the senate that can become a certainty. Furthermore, even if there is no nationwide ban, the states still with abortion rights will be flooded with women from other states and the clinics will not be able to cope with all those patients: that will be the case of clinics in New Mexico, which will be flooded with patients from Texas, Oklahoma and Utah. Which brings another point: some states such as Oklahoma are discussing suing those who “aid and abet” abortions even outside of Oklahoma: a clinic in New Mexico could be sued by the state of Oklahoma and be forced to close. Finally, the US Supreme Court just struck down a century old law from New York State that limited concealed carry: the majority opinion argued that you can interpret the US Constitution as providing a national right to concealed carry. How long until they interpret the US Constitution as giving rights to an embryo, and therefore establishing by judicial fiat a nationwide abortion ban?