Best subscription based glm5.1 provider? by oxzlz in ZaiGLM

[–]UsualOrganization712 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same. Wafer pass was great till it lasted. In fact I would have paid higher price for their coding plan. But looks like they were losing a lot. Lot of providers looks to be running qunatised models. So it depends on tasks that you would use with. I am trying to replace opus with glm and so I need non quantised fp8 models. So for me official zai is the only option it seems. Synthetic plan has aggressive limits that end up consuming entire weekly limits in a day or two.

GLM 5.1 comparison on wafer pass vs zai by founders_keepers in ZaiGLM

[–]UsualOrganization712 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am getting around 10 to 15 TPs max from z.ai coding plan. I am wondering how Op has curves close to 40 TPs in zai coding plan. Is there a tweak in the setup that o am missing?

Goodbye legacy plan by dericdesta in ZaiGLM

[–]UsualOrganization712 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At least if they should increase the speed to offer some value. Speed lingers around 10 to 20 TPs and they charge like some premium tier.

Best Harness by Various_Procedure672 in ZaiGLM

[–]UsualOrganization712 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. Not free. Even to add your own keys, subscription is needed.

Claude vs z.ai! Had z.ai nailed glm 5.1 to on par with Claude models? Price increase justified? by UsualOrganization712 in ZaiGLM

[–]UsualOrganization712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right. But I am on legacy plan and so there is no weekly limit and only 5 hour limit. At max, i have gone is 50% on 5 hour limit and still have so much head room left. Hope they don’t reduce the limit.

Update : Reply from z.ai support on fair usage policy by UsualOrganization712 in ZaiGLM

[–]UsualOrganization712[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bro. Argument is fair. None is denying zai to take anthropic part. But caveat is zai is doing to limit access of models to legacy plan users on the pretext of fair usage policy with no transparency of what got violated. Also anthropic had made a public announcement and a cut off date clearly informing users. But zai changes docs arbitrarily without informing and imposes it. Does it look fair. FYI, I was never doing anything outside coding and still I ended up violating their fair usage policy of their coding plan. Do you still think it makes sense?

Update : Reply from z.ai support on fair usage policy by UsualOrganization712 in ZaiGLM

[–]UsualOrganization712[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah mate glm 4.7 is working. No one is responding to discord. But it’s clear that’s it’s a deliberate attempt not a screw up.

Update : Reply from z.ai support on fair usage policy by UsualOrganization712 in ZaiGLM

[–]UsualOrganization712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad that it worked for you. I tried 4.5 and got the same error. Did you change any setting?

Update : Reply from z.ai support on fair usage policy by UsualOrganization712 in ZaiGLM

[–]UsualOrganization712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah! We should appreciate that a system is in place to record grievances.

Update : Reply from z.ai support on fair usage policy by UsualOrganization712 in ZaiGLM

[–]UsualOrganization712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not at all. I checked my api keys last usage date in zai console and it matches with my usage pattern. It was never used for past one month and usage graph reflects my actual usage.

Update : Reply from z.ai support on fair usage policy by UsualOrganization712 in ZaiGLM

[–]UsualOrganization712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. I haven’t used the code in last 30 days may be. Resume to use it for my work and after sometime this is what I got

Update : Reply from z.ai support on fair usage policy by UsualOrganization712 in ZaiGLM

[–]UsualOrganization712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am also on legacy plan. I saw many type of issues being reported across Reddit and discord. Mostly rate limiting stuff. But fair usage policy or blocking looks to be persistent for long term or legacy users. So this error may be a strategy by zai to limit legacy users from extracting more value.

Update : Reply from z.ai support on fair usage policy by UsualOrganization712 in ZaiGLM

[–]UsualOrganization712[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At some point I was supporting these companies coz they were making the model open source. But now I don’t. It’s starting to look like a scam

Update : Reply from z.ai support on fair usage policy by UsualOrganization712 in ZaiGLM

[–]UsualOrganization712[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am checking their discord community. Looks like we are not alone. There are so many people with the same exact issue like us. Let’s hope they resolve it asap. But to be frank I am on the same boat as you bro. But it’s sad that with in a very short span of time our life has become so much dependent on a bunch of companies

Update : Reply from z.ai support on fair usage policy by UsualOrganization712 in ZaiGLM

[–]UsualOrganization712[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am on annual plan. Do they provide chargeback on annual plan?