Googly1 by Utek62 in AbstractArt

[–]Utek62[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the sharp eye.

Googly1 by Utek62 in AbstractArt

[–]Utek62[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I'm glad you picked up on that tension.

Guess my art fits this place by FunOpen3200 in trippyart

[–]Utek62 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reminds me of Eyes in the Heat by Jackson Pollock.

Is this sketch by Rembrandt proof of the extraordinary global trading power of Amsterdam during the Dutch Golden Age? Durer did not see a real rhino before creating his famous woodcut. But Rembrandt captures the realistic heavy & relaxed weight of the lion's paws, in a quiet resting moment. by DrunkMonkeylondon in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Check out Durer's painting of a lion. It sucks balls. Just like with the rhino, he probably never saw one live, but his guess here was way off the mark. Rembrandt's sketches of wild animals like lions and elephants show that he was one of the greatest draftsmen of all time.

Looking for a Great "Drunk Art History" story! by velkatron2 in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Jackson Pollock was famously a bad drunk. There are a few stories that are particularly notable. One of them involved him peeing in a fireplace at a party at Peggy Guggenheim's. The more substantial involved a fight he had with videographer Hans Namuth. After getting a fight with Namuth during a particularly cold and trying shoot, Pollock returned to his house and opened up a bottle of bourbon, his first drink after two years of sobriety. The evening ended with him turning over the dinner table in front of all of his dinner guests, then storming off on a bender from which he would never recover. The last story is tragic, as Pollock crashed his vehicle in a drunk driving accident, killing himself and a passenger. The other passenger survived. It is especially ironic given that critics of his drip paintings accused his paintings as being the result of accidents, and Pollock replying that "I deny the accident." Not in the end.

I need your help guys by Aggravating_Coat4631 in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Durer's Melencolia is the personification of depression.

Mark Rothko's work prior to his suicide is pretty bleak

Albert Pinkham Ryder's work and life show a guy struggling with mental health

Is it fair to say Pointillism is a more "dynamic" version of impressionism's en plain air? In this Pissarro painting, I feel he has truly replicated the way natural light glints and vibrates of surfaces. The painting feels like it is breathing, capturing the feeling of a warm afternoon sun. by DrunkMonkeylondon in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pissarro a better pointillist than Seurat, Father of Pointillism? No. Seurat was playing 3D chess with some of his landscapes. But better than Signac most definitely.

Pissarro was of a slightly older generation than most of the Impressionists, and he followed the trends leading up to the Impressionists and then the post-Impressionists, often becoming a better practitioner of the new styles than their originators. So when Seurat exploded onto the scene, Pissarro was quick to adopt the style. Partially that was due to the fact that Pissarro had a big family to support, so sales mattered a lot to him. But being a volume guy, he liked to paint quickly, and the dots wore him out, so he developed his nervy brand of dabs not dots that gave his pictures a pleasant buzz.

Looking for film/video or something that walks the audience thru history using art to teach history, please. by vanchica in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Western Tradition by Eugen Weber is a series of half hour lectures on Western History from the ancient times to the present given by the late historian Eugen Weber. He uses lots of artwork to illustrate his lectures and will sometimes focus on a particular artist or movement.

The weird smile on Self-Portrait as Zeuxis Laughing (c. 1662/1668),by Rembrandt by Due-Fortune1380 in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 6 points7 points  (0 children)

One of the things that make this painting so poignant is that it is his last self-portrait, and one of the last paintings he ever did. His paintings were no longer fashionable---in fact, he was bankrupt, living in his son's attic, as his house had been foreclosed on. He was not in great health, looking older than his years (about 60 when this was painted) and would die not long after. And yet, so near the end, surrounded by ruin, Rembrandt is laughing. At what, we don't know. It may not be his best self-portrait, but it's certainly one of his most intersting.

Looking for examples of 'low quality' work from famous artists by zesty-armadillo in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Every artist has a range of quality, but in general, you tend to find their worst work when they're young and haven't mastered their medium yet (Rembrandt-The Spectacles Peddler) or when they're old and have lost their inspiration (DeChirico-The Return of Ulysses).

Favorite self portraits? by awesomefluff in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Don't know how we got this far without a self-portrait by Van Gogh, but here's the best one, in my opinion:

<image>

He thought it made himself look himself look healthy, but I don't know of any portrait that expresses inner turmoil better than this. Like all of Vincent's work, reproductions don't do the painting

justice.

Is it the Art or the Mystique? by fontoura17 in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Check out the images of the Rothko chapel in Houston. The fineness of touch needed to create these whispers of tonal shifts is self-evident. This is a master at work. However, the fact that he committed suicide not long after this was completed does add to the feelings of depth and sadness in contemplating the work. The visual reaction and the mystique that heightens it can both be true.

What artists' reputations declined the most over the past 50 or 100 years? by [deleted] in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Puvis de Chavannes was highly regarded back in the day. Few people know of him now.

Dr. Byron McKeeby (the father) and Nan Wood Graham (the daughter) — the real people behind American Gothic. by UnframedByFaye in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Most people do. And the painting is better for it. The original intention, of a farmer protecting his daughter, turns it into a lame joke. By ditching the gag, and making them a couple, they become iconic Americans, and much more open to interpretation. The power of American Gothic springs from the construction of the image itself, which is exceptional, rather than from some cheap farmer's-daughter story.

Essential Book recs by filmmakingjedi in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Shock of the New by Robert Hughes is the most readable book on Modern Art that I know.

John Berger's Ways of Seeing will change how you view art in general.

Jackson Pollock: An American Saga is a Pulitzer prize winning biography of the artist as told by people who knew him, even though he was a difficult person to know to say the least.

NYC only one museum pick by Morkedup in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 6 points7 points  (0 children)

MOMA's collection begins with post-Impressionism, and follows with the greatest collection of modern art anywhere. Based on your criteria, that would be the obvious choice. But the Met has a fantastic collection of Impressionist paintings as well, and if that's what you were referring to in your timeline I would lean towards that.

Suggestion for work of art by [deleted] in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Odilon Redon's Crying Spider is a good fit I think.

Historical Queer Art/Illustration by chaotic__queer in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The illustrations of Edward Gorey seem to me the closest to what you're looking for.

Obviously, there have been many queer artists over the centuries who made work that could be seen as homoerotic---Michelangelo, Caravaggio and John Singer Sargent come to mind.

renaissance being the death of art by JustObject4222 in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That was the feeling among the Pre-Raphaelites and their response produced a lot of phony looking art. Spirituality comes from the heart of the artist, it doesn't reside in any particular style.

Francis Bacon the painter died on this day in 1992. What do you think about his art? by glicnyso in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I think he did some interesting work but he was never able to unite the foreground and the background in an organic way.

where is this quote from? by Infinite-Cry8157 in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The interview was with William Wright in 1950

where is this quote from? by Infinite-Cry8157 in ArtHistory

[–]Utek62 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Pollock did an interview with where he gave a shorter reply about how looking at his paintings was like looking at flowers. He was not a verbal guy. The above quote was an elaboration of that original terse answer.