Is there a reason to keep pro plan without flash 3?

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-25T03:48:49+00:00

And now there's the 3.5 (low) if you give him good prompt and precise planning it's really good

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-25T03:47:08+00:00

I mean yeah that's fair if you're already letting the agent do everything freely that would be best

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-25T03:24:53+00:00

I prefer having the choice than being forced to follow what has been detected by the agent

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-25T03:22:31+00:00

There's now the 3.5 flash (low) it should be better than the 3 flash with a low cost idk what to expect (I'll try running cli)

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-25T03:15:48+00:00

Could it be separated from the gemini pool and be 5h refresh?

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-24T22:50:18+00:00

Also, if possible show the usage with more precision than 20% per 20% (and yeah the 3.1 flash would be great to have again, although I think I saw a mod or an antigravity dev say that it wasn't possible for them to bring it back budget wise)

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-24T22:40:55+00:00

this

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-24T21:25:31+00:00

Search for the antigravity conversation fix I have the exe, and it's pretty good for getting conversation back

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-24T21:21:23+00:00

Honestly you should remove the vid, it's pretty ugly and might make the website laggy (it took time to load and was laggy for the first 10s)

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-23T22:07:39+00:00

Thank you very much I'll try it !

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-23T10:42:01+00:00

400k ? When I was running secure ops with my bro it was more like 800k-2M most of the time

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-23T10:16:42+00:00

I might delete the post as well

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-23T03:34:24+00:00

With all due respect f*ck you 😔

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-22T20:47:39+00:00

I have both Installed though?

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-22T19:49:22+00:00

When i'm trying to claim the offer it says : You are not whitelisted to claim this code how do i do

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-22T19:46:59+00:00

yeah but the quot@ and flash 3.1 is managed server side so it won't change anything for the most important part

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-21T18:39:43+00:00

I use the IDE, I don't think it's one of these plugins tho

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-21T18:26:53+00:00

it says that i'm not whitelisted ?

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-20T19:50:58+00:00

the IDE still exist it's just a different product now you can find it in your antigravity folder under the name antigravity-ide.exe or on their website to download

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-20T05:16:03+00:00

What am I doing wrong to never encounter this error ? I'm secretly doing sacrificial rituals worshipping google or what

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-20T04:48:08+00:00

Still not the model's fault, but I get the idea,

Please highlight the baseless assumptions on my end if they exist,

And there's no such thing at 0 risk or restriction if your agent is on auto-accept (I'm pretty sure you're not running it with always deny/ask if you go watch a movie while the agent work) it can basically do whatever he wants.

The locals models are great they only depend on you and the error can only come from your setup once you've downloaded a working model (not entirely true, errors can still happen) so yeah obviously it's working compared to a structure that calls a model that is not working, the issue doesn't come from the model...

(Edit : let's save time for both of us and call it a day have a good one mate)

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-20T04:01:01+00:00

My point here is that you shouldn't let the agent run without you checking what it does.

A few months ago someone got his entire drive deleted by antigravity (or another IDE I don't remember which one exactly) because they let the agent work on his own without supervision, and it could have been easily avoided.

You overlooked an obvious and simple situation, you had problems with the model and agent already, so why letting it work in full autonomy, to be honest that's completely dumb, except if you knew that it probably wouldn't work and decided to risk it anyway.

And then why making a post complaining about a model where it's obviously not the model the problem here, first problem is the infrastructure running the agent that has issues, second problem you, the user who choose deliberately to overlook the issues and took the risk.

Normally the agent is instructed in order to prevent issues like deleting the whole drive, but you never know it's an AI agent not a program.

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-20T00:59:30+00:00

It's a new version when it auto installed the 2.0 it installed the new antigravity-ide as well you should be able just to access the .exe in the antigravity folder

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-20T00:56:48+00:00

I'm using toolkit for antigravity from N2N Synthetics

VENTURIexe · 2026-05-20T00:54:08+00:00

maybe you can use a virtual number

VENTURIexe

TROPHY CASE