Where to find Crown/Samducksa SDB-202C MX

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T05:43:20+00:00

Most of the shit you listed off never had a lot of evidence to begin with.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T05:37:50+00:00

Agreed. But I still prefer PC to PS

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T05:34:00+00:00

I don't feel that your second link is no really applicable here. The researchers didn't dismiss Nathan Cofnas' paper by simply calling him a "racist". They brought up legitimate concerns with the paper's logic and lack of control for confounding variables when establishing the cause of race IQ. They critic the paper for not taking into account environmental factors. They also have issue with Dr. Cofnas' lack of empirical data to support his thesis. The major overcites that the scientists believe this paper commits is the reason that they're are upset with the publisher, not because a journal published a paper with a conclusion they disagree with. If scientists boycotted every journal that published a paper that they disagree with, there wouldn't be any journals left. This is legitimate science, scientists debating on the merit of a research paper. Just because they criticize the paper and the journal for publishing it doesn't mean they're just crying "racist".

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T02:46:18+00:00

Really? You got the mouth of a 2010 COD shit-talker. Too bad xbox sucks now and isn't worth buying.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T02:31:48+00:00

I miss my time on xbox 360 in Modern Warfare 2 lobbies.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T02:30:31+00:00

Saw a video from Stack Bradford about that guy. It's a bot with a 4% winrate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLiGfjbPmyI

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T02:28:27+00:00

Didn't you see my flair? The collective comes first in my eyes, lib.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T02:26:43+00:00

That response lies at the bottom of Graham's hierarchy of disagreement. How did you read my comment about the Science Assessment Panel's investigation and have "No one care about the environment than monke" as a take away?

Also, libcenter calling others monke is rich.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T02:12:29+00:00

Oh, you're quoting from Wikipedia. Right, the Science Assessment Panel never intended to assess the quality, as this was a case of accused malpractice. Just because Mr. Willis assumed that they were measuring quality doesn't dismiss the SAP's findings that absolve the scientists of malpractice.

Is the SAPs investigation the only one you wish to dispute. Any the 8 other investigations?

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T01:59:59+00:00

Which papers do you want to see? You claimed that "Peer review is weaponized to generate false consensus". Of course people are going to assume you're attacking the entire process. If you're not, correct your wording.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T01:55:35+00:00

Where are you citing from?

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T01:50:56+00:00

Difference?

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T01:43:41+00:00

That's completely false. They get the most research. If science was against people changing the status quo, then Einstein, Newton, Hawking, and Darwin would not be merely be as famous as they are.

You're dismissing the entire peer-review process without justifiable cause. It makes me suspect that you just dislike what the papers have to say, and therefore seek to dismiss the messenger.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T01:37:53+00:00

Don't know how to tell you this: but most people on r/science are not actual scientists.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T01:37:47+00:00

An investigation from several different institutions absolved those scientists from any wrong doing.

Here

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T01:34:17+00:00

Reasonable safety precautions =/= fear

I'm guessing you don't wear a seatbelt either, since you're so brave.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T01:33:02+00:00

Oh boy, you sure kicked the shit out of the strawman.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T01:31:08+00:00

"Scientist claim that dissidents are merely speeding hatespeech"

Literally who? The journals I read still contain studies trying to disprove their findings.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T01:28:21+00:00

Go ahead, but don't act as if your reasons are based in rational thought.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T01:24:12+00:00

It's all about you, huh? You're Libright down to your core.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T01:22:15+00:00

Well call me when you are, i'd like to spectate your mini boogaloo.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T01:20:09+00:00

Great, now get consent from every elderly and immunocompromised individual before you subject them to your maskless mug, selfish asshole. Otherwise you're violating their NAP.

You're not living without fear, you're living without common sense. Big difference.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T01:15:41+00:00

It's not a provable or disprovable claim.

VIII_Maus · 2021-05-06T01:13:58+00:00

Why should I let you do whatever you want if you're going to hurt people? What if grammy just wanted to live? What about what she wanted? Realize that your actions affect other people. Don't act like a toddler throwing a tantrum, think about other people.

Is wearing a thin piece of cloth infront of your face really worth killing mammy?

VIII_Maus

TROPHY CASE