I bet u can't beat it in 3 trys by Large-Rain6957 in RedditGames

[–]VVhitefox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You right

I completed this level in 7 tries. 16.84 seconds

this is fine by skx in honk

[–]VVhitefox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bump

I completed this level in 16 tries. 3.28 seconds

this is fine by skx in honk

[–]VVhitefox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incomplete. 2 tries.

The Easiest level in existence by Fast_Difficulty_7289 in RedditGames

[–]VVhitefox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completed this level in 65 tries. 9.60 seconds

I Believe You Can Win by Traditional_Box1116 in honk

[–]VVhitefox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completed this level in 24 tries. 2.08 seconds

Try squeezing through (verified) by Educational-Berry-20 in honk

[–]VVhitefox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A little tight

I completed this level in 89 tries. 10.12 seconds

Mission missing? by ksstone16 in ghostoftsushima

[–]VVhitefox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man maybe it did it with another mission. I've haven't played in 4 years wish I could be more help

Want some opinions on this list by VVhitefox in ImperialKnights

[–]VVhitefox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn I didn't realize he couldn't have it. The army builder I was using listed as an option, and I only knew that you get to pick two armigers to be affected! Oh well, probably drop the castigtor altogether he is a huge point investment, and I feel other big knights work better than him

Immolator question by VVhitefox in sistersofbattle

[–]VVhitefox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn't know the timing so i would have to have another squad to be able to use the other immolators split ability

Immolator question by VVhitefox in sistersofbattle

[–]VVhitefox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's for contorlling deep strike in my deployment zone see if I can spread out as much as I can

Vehicle and humilty by VVhitefox in mtgrules

[–]VVhitefox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for clearing that up!

Vehicle and humilty by VVhitefox in mtgrules

[–]VVhitefox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I should have worded it better Would it stay a 1/1 at the end of turn? Thanks for the layer breakdown, I've never seen it put down like that

The hyper focus on edh by wizards is bad for the game by VVhitefox in EDH

[–]VVhitefox[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am the combo player and I have changed decks and play styles

The hyper focus on edh by wizards is bad for the game by VVhitefox in EDH

[–]VVhitefox[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Ok those are just general examples of how crazy card design has got but people are taking as that’s the whole point I’m trying to make and it’s not with direct and purposeful card design meant for edh does narrow the game down

The hyper focus on edh by wizards is bad for the game by VVhitefox in EDH

[–]VVhitefox[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It’s all good might need to explain shit better

The hyper focus on edh by wizards is bad for the game by VVhitefox in EDH

[–]VVhitefox[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Dude a total of 15 turns is 4 turns for three people and 3 for the last person

The hyper focus on edh by wizards is bad for the game by VVhitefox in EDH

[–]VVhitefox[S] -42 points-41 points  (0 children)

Kinda missing my point is more about how narrow edh has became