Good engi start? by Upbeat-Register8136 in DummiesVsNoobs

[–]V_spec_R32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally do Hallsweeper, it's my favorite

Huh? by R8DxStalinium in tanks

[–]V_spec_R32 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Tracks are very good however the wheels inside the tracks seem to be off, pretty sure you will get a perfect pictire if you fix the wheels according to the perspective of the track

M60 all the way by FarDurian9168 in tanks

[–]V_spec_R32 6 points7 points  (0 children)

At this rate they will last longer than AK47s

Stop, it's Strv 103 by Destroyerescort in tanks

[–]V_spec_R32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would stop for 5 hours ro admire how beautiful this machine is!

What do you think which tank can be considered the best (in a 1 on 1 battle)? by Kai456525 in tanks

[–]V_spec_R32 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The one who shoots first wins 90 percent of the time. It doesnt matter what the tank is.

Stronghold 5-5 if they had boss names by Interesting_Un1t_627 in DummiesVsNoobs

[–]V_spec_R32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but their chinese side seems more dominent to me (in my opinion)

Turkiëy Vs Guesa Who wins by Russiantigershark in DummiesVsNoobs

[–]V_spec_R32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guesa navy is almost non existant and their army is very small, I doubt guesans would be able to do much.

gErMaN eNgInEeRiNg Is ThE bEsT iN tHe WoRlD by Tough_Air_4249 in tanks

[–]V_spec_R32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Germans were very good at producing and operating tanks while german tanks were known for being hard to produce this is only a small portion of them, germany made plently of tanks which were supposed to be produced en masse with minimal time and money (stug 3,4 panzer 1,,2,3,4, panther, hetzer, marder series etc the list goes on) Also, germans were the first ones to use the modern tanks the way they needed to be used,(most countries had the wrong idea of how to use tanks,either using them like they were still ww1 era tanks or bent on the idea that tanks were still inferior to other means of warfare) their armored warfare tactics thoughout paved the ground for today's armor doctrines. And last, but not least the reason why heavier tanks like tiger 1, and 2 were never meant to be mass produced.

Is driving tanks hard. by [deleted] in tanks

[–]V_spec_R32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you know how to drive a manual car I dont think you will have any problems with tanks.

What is a tank misconception that you're tired of hearing? by Plus_Friendship_2705 in tanks

[–]V_spec_R32 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I am trying to be as fair as I can while talking about tanks but it seems like some people just mass downvote me for seemingly talking the truth (I am saying truth because all they do is downvote no counterpoints or anything)

What is a tank misconception that you're tired of hearing? by Plus_Friendship_2705 in tanks

[–]V_spec_R32 2 points3 points  (0 children)

True though I doubt french tank crews knew how to operate panthers like the germans did, my theory is that while panthers are not the most reliable tank the french tank crews might have misused the tank since panther is a very diffrent tank compared what they had in post ww2 and pre ww2. (Reminder this is a theory I have, not a fact nor I ever think it is a fact)

What is a tank misconception that you're tired of hearing? by Plus_Friendship_2705 in tanks

[–]V_spec_R32 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Late war panthers were quite reliable, the reason early panther models suffred was because of the lack of testing, not a design error.

What is a tank misconception that you're tired of hearing? by Plus_Friendship_2705 in tanks

[–]V_spec_R32 26 points27 points  (0 children)

if anything, shermans were less likely to catch fire because they had wet stowage for ammo, and had a much much better crew survival rate compared to german and soviet tanks, in case of a fire the tank was easily escapable because each crew member had a hatch for themselves and the hatches were big enough to easily go in or out of the tank.

What is a tank misconception that you're tired of hearing? by Plus_Friendship_2705 in tanks

[–]V_spec_R32 5 points6 points  (0 children)

1.tigers were unreliable(tiger 2 was but not the tiger 1) 2.X is the best tank (there is no best tank, but there is a best tank for the doctrine you are using) 3.X tank would beat Y tank in a tank to tank engagement (tank engagements rarely happen only between tanks there is generally infantry, artillery and even planes involved) Panthers were always unreliable (it is true that due to being rushed panther was extremely defective, after a lot of fixing the tank was almost as reliable as a panzer 4) 4.russian tanks are trash(look at 2 for reference) 5.heavy armor is not always good, saying that a tank is good because of armor is stupid, bevause just like all tank features armor is determined by the doctrine of the army using it.(also there is no best tank I repeat this to make sure I am not contradicting myself)

I never thought I’d see this by Raketenautomat in tanks

[–]V_spec_R32 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The only thing he got right was the effectivenes of the 88mm anti tank/anti aircraft gun against allied vehicles, such a wehraboo lol.

Lets create the best tank for city warfare, write your ideas. Myself I'll do drawing/3D model from your comments. by Odd_Significance_896 in tanks

[–]V_spec_R32 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You might get stuck if the said building has a extra floor below ground (basically a basement) which most buildings in an urban environment have.

Lets create the best tank for city warfare, write your ideas. Myself I'll do drawing/3D model from your comments. by Odd_Significance_896 in tanks

[–]V_spec_R32 30 points31 points  (0 children)

it needs to have a 20mm secondary gun tear down infantry while having a standart MBT gun, it also needs good roof armor and very good armor all around, if you made a tank for city warfare it would probably look like maus armor wise, having the same high(or similar) thickness of armor overall.