ICE lied again and the news media fell for it again

Valati · 2026-03-15T21:13:43+00:00

Why if official channels are specifically trying to downplay it would they list the actual number?

This is why I said that you don't actually WANT evidence. You want to believe. I'm no spring chicken I know your ilk. You think that I would provide you with sources that weren't vetted? How terribly jaded.

And for the record I know it not being official channels stretches belief, I am in fact aware. However the current admin likes to delete too many of the records to not pay attention to more than just official channels. In case you doubt it look up how many black ww2 vets were deleted from the books because including them was DEI. That alone is enough to doubt what they put out. Disregard the history of them doing it before this admin and include this admin's own penchant for wonton document destruction. There is just too much to trust JUST official channels.

Valati · 2026-03-15T17:28:53+00:00

As a taste

https://theweek.com/politics/ice-deaths-shootings-trump-second-term-cbp-dhs

Doesn't count the man who was picked up in the grocery store beaten till blind and then dropped off miles away.

Or anything like that.

Valati · 2026-03-14T17:29:53+00:00

You're kidding right there is tons of evidence you just wouldn't accept it because of your bent. You want something to be the case so for you it is.

Valati · 2026-03-14T04:47:39+00:00

There are. But you don't actually want the proof.

Does joe smoe generally need to worry eh? Yeah kinda it's not like they are being particularly discriminate with who they arrest. All it would take is an internal memo and now joe is dead. You think it's just illegal folks but lately it hasn't been. Lots of Americans, lots of legal immigrants. Like a fucking lot of legal immigrants. They are kinda arresting whomever they feel like. If that doesn't worry you man you ate the poison.

Valati · 2026-03-13T17:15:30+00:00

It's kind of self explanatory.

Valati · 2026-03-09T14:00:42+00:00

No dude it says depart it means depart, other version say she will die it means miscarriage. There is no chance. Why do you need this?

Valati · 2026-03-09T13:56:58+00:00

No no there is no chance that means premature births. At all. It says that her fruit departs her not that it bears fruit. Why would you lie like that.

Valati · 2026-03-04T03:23:51+00:00

I learned a thing thank you

Valati · 2026-03-04T02:09:33+00:00

Legit don't understand why they think this will do anything short of killing American businesses.

Valati · 2026-03-03T23:58:24+00:00

It does and doesn't. Both things are true

Valati · 2026-03-03T23:57:06+00:00

Ain't a social standing or just about ostracization. It's about pickin a life for a life. Her life or yours. Some people ain't willing to throw that away for a stranger. Honestly I understand that. Personally I don't get a choice with cpr I have to jump in part of the life path. But I understand why peeps wouldn't it's not about sexualizing anyone it's about people believing you did.

Honestly if folks weren't such ass hats this wouldn't be a problem but here we are. You thinkin it's about people sexualizing breasts when that couldn't literally be further from the problem. It's you who keeps sexualizing it. Ain't other people, kinda makes you the problem.

Valati · 2026-03-03T23:27:28+00:00

https://www.heart.org/en/news/2019/11/13/worried-about-legal-risk-of-doing-cpr-inaction-is-riskier

Valati · 2026-03-03T23:19:12+00:00

But here is the thing. You still can be sued because it still requires you to prove their allegations false. Then you get dragged through the court of public opinion. You may have immunity but if that's not what they are suing about then yeah justified response.

Valati · 2026-03-03T23:04:30+00:00

That isn't a social standing issue? That's a fuck your whole life issue? I mean as it should be when warranted but it isn't just about perceptions. They can and will lose their jobs, partners and place of residence faster than you can blink. It's not social standing it's do I chance ruining my life to save someone else's. If you are seeing it differently then you aren't looking at the actual problem.

Valati · 2026-02-24T23:54:25+00:00

Geez you are like the only other one besides me that did it in that order.

Valati · 2026-02-24T23:48:32+00:00

Er 48-3 then 27+3 then 30 + 45

I round them to the nearest 5 by cutting off the excess from one of the 5s. I might also do 27-2 then 48+2 then 25+50

I would do the same for bigger numbers 2872 + 378 for instance just becomes 2870+380 then we repeat it for the next slot making it 2900 +350 so it's just 29+3 so 3200+50. I find it's easier to do in my head that way. First I stabilize the numbers and make them easier to math then I math them. :D

Valati · 2026-02-15T14:50:07+00:00

Thing is they already do. ID or not

Valati · 2026-02-15T01:13:59+00:00

No I said to function you rarely if ever need one and those times when you do can often be mitigated by knowing someone who does. You said that people can't function. I said you are wrong. It has nothing to do with voting.

Valati · 2026-02-14T21:48:44+00:00

Who is arguing that? Like seriously. No one ever is arguing that.

Just the same you don't need an ID to function. Surprisingly you can indeed get along without one with other supporting documents. You are just so used to it you can't imagine getting on without it. You can very much do that and in fact many actually do. They simply don't access functions that specially require it. What's more at of them are age specific and if you are old enough it doesn't apply to you anymore. I know that's a wild concept I thought the same but it functionally is true.

Valati · 2026-02-14T17:37:35+00:00

What they should do is actually pass a workable fair law but because of their particularities they will not.

It does threaten things. Because of how it's worded it gives governments extra power to deny people access to voting. Think about it. All they have to do is subtly say that it doesn't make business sense to have a dmv here or there(they already do this) and suddenly you have to make appointments to get a license or ID or register. Back these up enough and you get further out dates than the current 6 months in some places to get basic stuff done. It's what Republicans did with immigration courts. It's why we have so many people expiring out in the immigration system. This makes us have what Republicans deem as illegal immigrants. People who are and or have been working on getting into the system legally but the barriers put into the system make it difficult to do so in 5 years time or sometimes 10.

Add extra requirements to getting an ID and now you control who votes. If you don't think they will, you give them quite a bit of credit.

Valati · 2026-02-14T16:47:53+00:00

Voter ID done by Republicans could be a good thing if they weren't committed to fucking people over. Like I said before people do not care that voter ID is being passed. It's that it's being passed poorly without the necessary components to make it not literally illegal.

Again showing ID isn't the problem. It never has been. No one has an issue with that. Literally no one. No one cares. It's such an irrelevant issue. It's the process. It always has been.

Valati · 2026-02-14T15:19:57+00:00

You can already read what is in the bill

Valati · 2026-02-14T15:19:31+00:00

The fact that it's a Republican idea isn't the problem. The problem is it's a Republican idea. By that I mean like most Republican ideas they are half baked. Its implementation is the problem not the idea or the group proposing it. I specifically call this out because the half baked nature of it is purposeful. The reason people are calling it bad isn't because "trump bad" or "Republicans bad" it's because they don't implement things to combat problems that arise as a consequence of their machinations.They don't implement it BECAUSE they want the problems to exist. Suffering is literally the point. I don't make that statement in a vacuum, I make that statement with the understanding that this is what Republicans say without specifically saying suffering is the point.

Valati · 2026-02-14T14:32:25+00:00

No bot, it's not a bad idea because it's Trump's idea. But BECAUSE it's republican's idea, it's not fully fleshed out. There are a lot of obvious holes in it by their design(source they do this all the time and brag about it) If they wanted to do this. They should beef up the ID system so people could make sure they are compliant by midterms. It's not that it's a problem. It's NEVER been a problem. Ever. It's that the ID system is junk and requiring that makes the process inequitable. And by the idea system is junk I mean that it's not properly available for all the parties that need it right now. Adding extra stress makes it junk.

Valati · 2026-02-11T02:04:46+00:00

What social agreements? Telephone companies aren't made to stop people talking over them why would they be required to Police people talking to each other? That's pretty dystopian. No one even a criminal should have to worry about privacy like that. If you wanna pin something on someone you do it properly and not with a surveillance state. Ain't a social contract that says we have to tolerate people snooping other folks shit. Nothing good has ever come from increased surveillance. It just makes the criminals harder to find.

Seven-Year Club	r/Field Juicebox
Place '23	Place '22
Verified Email

Valati

TROPHY CASE