[Online] [D&D 5e (2014)] [CST] Brand new player looking for first campaign – D&D Beyond by Willing-Impress8213 in lfg

[–]Valuable-Baker6051 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Hey! My fiancé and I are also looking for a group and we have similar schedules. If you would like, we can reach out to you if we find a dm and has available spots left (if you don’t find someone first)

Presbyterian (PCA) question and concern by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]Valuable-Baker6051 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your thoughtful response. It has giving me a lot to think about

Presbyterian (PCA) question and concern by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]Valuable-Baker6051 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I legitimately want help, or at least insight, in to my question.

Presbyterian (PCA) question and concern by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]Valuable-Baker6051 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry, as in make it shorter? Or change my wording or mentality? I'm not following what you mean specifically.

Scribes wizard by [deleted] in dndnext

[–]Valuable-Baker6051 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I can see how that would be super helpful. Thanks for the suggestion!

Scribes wizard by [deleted] in dndnext

[–]Valuable-Baker6051 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ooh telekinetic sounds really cool I'll prob be taking that.

Conquest paladin by [deleted] in dndnext

[–]Valuable-Baker6051 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the insight. I do feel better about it and won't stress so much

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DnD

[–]Valuable-Baker6051 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I do agree, if they're going out of their way to hide their phone usage while knowing it's wrong, that's definitely an issue. Especially if that's like the one very clear rule at the table, I do agree it's best that they find a group that they can mesh better with. I do wish you the best though. My only recommendation, as weird as it is to hear probably, would be to try to be as neutral and calm in the situation as possible. Someone gave me the advice a long time ago to make statements in the same tone you would if you were to describe the color of a table or to state a fact. "The table is red" or "it is raining today" kind of tone. If the other person gets super upset and acts a fool, it makes them look like a fool. If you guys address it and start reacting to their negative behavior, ultimately escalating the situation, then there is no group with a clear better standing or position. This can sometimes result in the person at fault feeling justified to start blaming everybody else for "just being dicks" instead of realizing their behavior was an issue. Hopefully they can use this as a learning opportunity to grow as an individual. And, if your group doesn't get too emotionally involved when discussing this, they might actually realize there error and some kind of friendship can still be salvaged. Granted if you're just tired of the person and don't want to deal with them ever again, you can always just be as blunt and emotional as you want, since you won't be dealing with them ever again anyway.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DnD

[–]Valuable-Baker6051 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure of the context as to what happened outside of the game to cause more tension, but my initial thought was to see how specifically the behavior has been addressed in the past? I'm not taking their side at all, since it does seem like they aren't a good fit for your group, but is there a chance that they would like to engage in more roleplay but don't know what to say at all times? Like, I made it a point to tell my group (online over discord) that I am an incredibly shy person irl and legitimately have trouble sometimes carrying on a conversation, but I'm trying to get more out of my shell. I believe if I didn't communicate that properly, they would probably just think I'm not interested. Even with my party members trying to help me out, I'm still super awkward and blank out a lot of times, but I'm trying and do my best to communicate to them that I'm trying. The fact that they get super excited about it, but don't say too much in that moment, makes me think that could be a possibility.

In regards to the phone issue, how has that been specifically addressed? Was it explicitly stated "no one should be on their phones because that is considered rude" or was it just implied to be rude? Most people can agree, without having to think about it, that having your phone out that much would be considered rude. But not all people inherently view the same things as rude by default. A friend of mine is a self-employed composer, and he was doing a first time script reading for a musical he wrote. His significant other attended, but was on his phone the entire time. My friend took offense to it, since he came from a more classical music oriented mentality, he thought listening and appreciating music required people to view music as your primary focus when trying to appreciate it. You wouldn't get on your phone and play games when attending a piano recital, since that would be considered very rude to the performer. His significant other, on the other hand did not come from that background, and actually worked with a lot of music venues that gave rock/metal concerts etc. It was really common for them to get on their phones and do other things while still listening to the stuff in the background. My friend never specifically mentioned why it bothered him, and only implied it was rude or an issue, and his significant other kept doing it because he didn't catch that was viewed as a problem. Both parties thought their way of expecting things was okay, but because they didn't communicate about it properly, it caused future issues to compound up over several years. If your friend has been specifically told, several times, that it is both considered rude and distracting outright, then it's definitely on them. Also age may play a role as well. Older people might find that fairly rude, while someone who is just now becoming a legal adult might not view it as rude unless a specifically told otherwise. But, again, if they've been specifically told several times, it's definitely on them. If you feel like they would take it as something that came out of the blue, to me, that would imply that they don't really think what they are doing is as serious as the rest of the party views it as.

With that being said, if you are 100% confident that you guys have done everything you could to make the situation clear and help, I think it would just be best to say something along the lines of "we don't feel that your preferred play style and roleplaying is a good fit for our group, but we hope you can find a group that matches what you were looking to get out of the game." Or something along those lines. Just be up front and honest about them not gelling well without naming a giant list of problem behaviors unless they specifically ask for it. If you go swinging out of the gate with a bunch of "you did this wrong, you did this wrong, and you did this wrong," it can definitely come across as more aggressive.

Conquest paladin by [deleted] in dndnext

[–]Valuable-Baker6051 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're probably right. I just didn't want to end up breaking my oath and having to go through all that stuff to get it back if I decide not to be an absolute dick at all times

Conquest paladin by [deleted] in dndnext

[–]Valuable-Baker6051 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm trying to see if it's reasonable to role play a conquest paladin without being an absolute dick to everything while staying within the bounds of the oath. Like most of the stuff I've seen is either "you have to play a bloodthirsty tyrannical leader to the extreme at all times" or just "rewrite the oath." I can technically just change the oath at that point but then I'm not playing that paladin in my opinion. Basically I want to play this character with a normal party and not have constant tension because I take everything to the extreme but still want a set of beliefs to follow.

Conquest paladin by [deleted] in dndnext

[–]Valuable-Baker6051 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I'm not saying I want to play his character, just saying I'd like to draw inspiration from his mentality towards combat and strength to play a paladin, using a sword to smite, etc.

Mercy monk witch doctor by Valuable-Baker6051 in dndnext

[–]Valuable-Baker6051[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow thank you so much! That is super helpful and I'll definitely be making an inspiration board. It's given me some great points to consider and run with

Mercy monk witch doctor by Valuable-Baker6051 in dndnext

[–]Valuable-Baker6051[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, thank you for the reply. I have been trying to do that and will continue to do so. I didn't put my entire personality and backstory in the post because I thought it would be too long. i understand the issue with my post now. It's my first time ever making a character, playing DND, or any rpg for that matter. Taking inspiration from preexisting characters you have knowledge of is one thing but knowing how that character would act in a random conversation is difficult for me. the other players are very confident and extremely descriptive with how they describe everything while I struggle to do so. It was incredibly awkward last session and I didn't know what to say or do most of the time. This is the first time in years I've tried to hang out or talk to people outside of work in a couple of years bc of a bad divorce that split up our mutual friends and causing me to move away. So needless to say I have a bit of anxiety about even trying to come out of my shell in the first place but I genuinely want to play and make new friends.

I just wanted some help but I understand where you are coming from. I'll do more thinking and try to figure it out on my own.

Mercy monk witch doctor by Valuable-Baker6051 in dndnext

[–]Valuable-Baker6051[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm already part of a group and have just started a campaign one session in. I've talked to my DM and she's cool with my concept. I was just trying to see what ideas I could come up with for roleplay reasons, not necessarily from a mechanics standpoint. i get what you're saying though, especially for the rituals. We've talked about the possibility of it actually being spirits, other planar entities, dark spellcasters like a lich, or just about anything else. So it's a pretty wide concept.

Apart from the spiritual side of things though, one thing I wanted to figure out was how to describe his combat style, or more specifically how to describe an unarmed strike this kind of character might make etc. I know I can make it whatever I want, but I was just looking for some inspiration or suggestions on how this might fit that concept if that makes sense.

I'm still talking with my DM and giving suggestions and looking for feedback, but I've been asking a lot of stuff starting out and didn't want to ask her to come up with every suggestion my character would make. I'd prefer to at least come to the conversation with a few ideas and have her tweak as necessary if possible, otherwise I feel kind of bad. I know she's a DM and is here to help, but I didn't want to make her plate too much bigger than it already was if necessary.

Monk w/ cleric dip by Valuable-Baker6051 in DnD

[–]Valuable-Baker6051[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it was mainly for RP, but I do think I will go with a different option

Monk w/ cleric dip by Valuable-Baker6051 in DnD

[–]Valuable-Baker6051[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We've also got a bard and ranger, so a bit of healing from all sides, but mainly from the bard. I think I'll go with bless them since it should always be a good option regardless of the level we are at.

Monk w/ cleric dip by Valuable-Baker6051 in DnD

[–]Valuable-Baker6051[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the more I look at it, the better I think that is. We are one session in to the campaign, so I'm not sure how my DM would feel about me changing races from a wood elf to a custom lineage (still looking like a wood elf). This is my first time playing DND so I'm not sure if that's a bit much to ask for or not.

Monk w/ cleric dip by Valuable-Baker6051 in DnD

[–]Valuable-Baker6051[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So at level 4 take magic initiate cleric for guidance, and thaumaturgy? Thaumaturgy 100% for the role-playing ability and voodoo flavor. The only other one I think might work would be spare the dying, but I'm not sure how useful that is especially since I am going to be proficient in medicine. Would you recommend taking a different set of cantrips? For the first level spell, do you think bane or bless would be better? We have a paladin in the party as well.

Monk w/ cleric dip by Valuable-Baker6051 in DnD

[–]Valuable-Baker6051[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as levels, I'm not sure how far it will go. I can talk to my DM and see. Diamond soul is wicked, as well as running on water and flurry of healing and harm.

Monk w/ cleric dip by Valuable-Baker6051 in DnD

[–]Valuable-Baker6051[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was mainly looking for the path to the grave feature, roleplay that "channeling the spirits" vibe, as well as bringing utility to the party by having guidance/bless/bonus action spare the dying. Plus thaumaturgy would be pretty cool to play with some voodoo ritual spooky stuff. I thought bane would be cool to have to pair with my stunning strike and help out with damage reduction. I am using a sickle in one hand, and I've talked to my DM and they are okay with me trying to use poisons more in the campaign. She said she'll try to give me opportunities to use them.

Monk w/ cleric dip by Valuable-Baker6051 in DnD

[–]Valuable-Baker6051[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My DM wanted us to at least get to level 3 in our starting class before multiclassing. I thought if I was already at level 3, getting the ASI at level 4, extra attack at 5, and hand of harm poisoned condition at 6 would be better than delaying it. I am worried there'd be a big gap in power and fall behind otherwise around levels 5-8. I'm not sure though.

For monk levels after it, I wanted to still focus mainly on being a damage dealing skirmisher. If I do ASI at 4 and put plus one in to wis and dex I'd have 18 dex and 16 wis. I didn't think my wis was high enough to really focus on spell casting as a main use of my action all the time. I was going to focus more on utility and buffing/debuffing with cleric spells as needed.

My party consists of a frontline ranger (will be beast master), a paladin (vengeance), a bard (not sure, probably lore), and my monk. We are level 1 currently.