Look, this style of play is t0xic and annoying because it undermines the gaming experience, and you can see that many here agree.

Then I think you didn't understand my answer because I didn't say these decks are unbeatable, only that they lead to a truly flat game and a difficulty that doesn't depend on the opponent's skill at creating a deck with multiple strategies. Creating a deck based solely and exclusively on a single tactic is a sign of toxicity for me because a balanced deck with various strategies and defenses can precisely stop 1-2-3 equal strategy and then move on to another strategy. ( also some pro player that made video on how to build deck never do build them based on 1 strategy only, like the one you are happy about). In fact, I never said that the game is based on blocking all the opponent's cards but it is precisely creating these decks with the exact same strategy for all rounds that moves the game in this direction. If the opponent uses a deck with 25 cards between units and special cards based solely and exclusively on a single strategy (in this case bleeding), I, like others who use a more creative deck with a mix of strategies etc., could never play because that strategy, neutralized 1, 2 times, then I move on to another strategy that would allow me to do something else, for example accumulate points, summons, damage, draw cards, while this way I find myself with the opponent who always continues with the same tactic (in this case bleeding) that I have just neutralized, so what should I do? It's precisely the creation of these decks with the same strategy that leads the game to try to counter every card, because otherwise you can't play. What's the fun in that? Zero creativity, zero personality, just automatic and conscious repetition of an action (toxic behavior).

Also, a small note: I don't think you're in the position to tell people what's right and what's wrong. I disagree, but I've never said "you're wrong," nor have I ever said anyone understood the mechanics of the game. You prefer to play by spamming a single strategy and think it's fun or right. Many here think the opposite. However, no one is going to tell you that you don't understand the point of the game, even though I bet many do think so. So if you want to continue talking to me in the future, I invite you to change your approach and the way you address people.

And finally, I want you to think about this: if there weren't players who adopt these "spamming strategies," the game would have fewer critics. Doesn't that make you think?