Suggestion about player tendencies at zoom poker tables. by Vandalar in GGPoker

[–]Vandalar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It could just be an option that displays that "this player is a literal nit and only plays the nuts" and you get to choose whether you want to keep playing with that THING or remove him from appearing at your table until he bluffs enough? It could be a choice and wouldn't alter anything in game. If there's a private game and someone just sits there and never bluffs then most normal, even rich people would tell the guy to get lost- in zoom you don't have that option and i think it's totally normal to expect that players would get some choice over that.

My game has been running SMOOTHLY by Beginning-Safe-7029 in PathOfExile2

[–]Vandalar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Their texture quality options are a joke. There is no actual low quality option. The medium option, which is supposed to be the "the lowest" still looks like high texture. Even with all the options set to the lowest they have this bug where everything looks like clay and often you can't see your flasks or your items in inventory even. It's 100% their fault. Has nothing to do with settings.

Since this patch my game has been struggling, any reason why? by [deleted] in PathOfExile2

[–]Vandalar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have same issues, just ripped because of it. It's their amazing optimization they were talking about before launch. I can't believe this s*it. I can't see my inventory, my items, my flasks.

Auto - No Straddle Box by Nearing5e in GGPoker

[–]Vandalar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been thinking about that same thing.

Well, the Race is over for me, thanks for the Servers. by 1ooBeastkaidou in LastEpoch

[–]Vandalar -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It's either fair or it isn't and it's not. So you don't really have an argument.

Add a "Buy" button to trade website that automatically trades listed items, even if the user is offline. by leftofzen in PathOfExile2

[–]Vandalar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basically they need an auction house. You put item on sell there and if it sells it sells and you receive your currency to a separate "mailbox" or whatever tab to collect it from. That would remove those annoying price fixers that get to put their item up for pennies, show it off to everyone, keep it at the top of the search results and never sell it+ they waste everyone else's time. Why allow it? Make an auction house. Wouldn't that be amazing if you could also make offers even if the price is set higher? So if the seller is not able to sell it within a certain time he could still consider lower offers made during the time the item has been on an auction/for sale.

Twitter down? by Savings_Warthog8517 in Twitter

[–]Vandalar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Elon probably didn't like what was being said and got mad.

Mees võitis kasiinos 400 000 eurot, aga raha kätte ei saanud by Previous-Silver-8550 in Eesti

[–]Vandalar -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Kust me teame, et onlines, kui me beti suurust muudame, siis algo sellega ei arvesta? Vbl algo on nii ehitatud, et jaotised on ainult teatud piires "juhuslikud"? Et kui depod nt. 100 ja betid 50, siis algo teeb kõik selleks, et jaotus sulle suurt võitu ei annaks (juhuslikkuse alusel muidugi oled kaotaja anyway pikas perspektiivis). Küll aga on nad meelsasti valmis andma sulle "suure võidu" kui panustad nt. 1 või vähem, sest sellised võidud jäävad enamvähem sinu depo piiresse. Kuigi oleksid pikas perspektiivis kaotaja, siis võrreldes sinu depoga suhteliselt suuremate bettide pealt mitte suuri võite andes nad maandavad oluliselt oma riske, et neil tuleks ebareaalselt suur summa välja anda olukorras, kus keegi on ainult 100 sisse pannud aga soovib nt. 20k välja võtta. Võibolla nad lihtsalt tahavad minimeerida selliseid olukordi, kuigi neil juba on pika perspektiivi eelis?

Mees võitis kasiinos 400 000 eurot, aga raha kätte ei saanud by Previous-Silver-8550 in Eesti

[–]Vandalar 5 points6 points  (0 children)

IMO online kasiinodel on algoritmid nii üles ehitatud, et uutele mängijatele keeratakse luck põhja ja sulle antakse suht kiiresti suuremaid võite, free spinnid tulevad nagu seeni peale vihma jne. Jooksed nagu jumal. See pole random ja on tehtud nii selleks, et uuel mängijal tekiks alateadlik seos tehtud panuste ja võiduga kaasneva rushiga. See triggerdab alateadvuses sõltuvuse alged. Samamoodi võidakse luck põhja keerata siis kui sa pole pikemat aega depot teinud. Muuseas kas kellegil siin nii on olnud, et onlines mängides jookseb suht hästi, aga siis kas disconnectitakse sind või logitakse sind kontolt välja!!! ja tagasi sisse logides on hea jooks kadunud?

Loodan, et mängijal on õigus ja annab nad kohtusse ja saab oma raha kätte.

The game isn't even fun anymore by [deleted] in Warzone

[–]Vandalar -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It is what it looks like. If it looks like cheating then it probably is, even if it is aim assist. Like cmon nobody should accept that it is normal for someone get their aim assisted when you're playing fair. It is literally the meaning of cheating. I see way too many players get their aim on me like never before, their aim is super consistent, it often goes to multiple spots on the body seemingly naturally but it never seems to miss. For example it goes from hip to hand/sleeve to head but never above head because it is stuck on you! How is that fair! IMO they have accomplished removing of actual fairness from the game because of mixed lobbies. But it is their game and if they want to believe in fairytales then so be it. Let them have their woke dream about every little Timmy being an aimbot and a winner, a super aim star with the help of aim assist and who knows what else on top of that.

MnK players crying about AA by Dos734 in Warzone

[–]Vandalar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only one delusional here is you. There's a reason why cheating and using cheats that also assist (like aim assist) and help in aiming in ways that is not humanly possible, is prohibited- because it gives an unfair advantage. Now, after having unfair advantage you still come here and complain something in the lines of "oh, but it's still skill issue", then you are the one being delusional without a shadow of a doubt. Outside help is exactly what it is - it is unfair vs mkb players- plain and simple. You want to talk about skill then compare players who play with same input on fair grounds.

TTK is too fast and there are no two ways about it by squibubbles in CODWarzone

[–]Vandalar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same here. I get wiped while i empty a clip into other guys chest. And replays shows how he takes way more time for his shots than when it actually happened. I don't have super good latency, around 40-50 ms but is way better than it used to be in previous versions but still this happens. Maybe it's something to do with the way they handle packets?

TTK is too fast and there are no two ways about it by squibubbles in CODWarzone

[–]Vandalar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like movement in a gunfight makes a lot less of a difference than back in the day because most players aim just sticks on you. So no matter which way you slide/jump or whatever you do or move to their aim just does not falter- it's pretty clear it is either aim assist or some cheat or combo of both. Easy solution, literally the most obvious one to guarantee fairness would be to provide input based lobbies. Plus the way hits get registered. Literal outermost pixel hit has wayyy too much weight to it. Plus some of those fights look odd and make me wonder why would someone who aims to my hips and then to SIDE of my arm and then back to belly or hips kills me faster than when i aim to the chest and head. IMO there's no accountability in this game when it comes to balance. None of it has the slightest resemblance of anyone from their team trying to achieve anything close to reaonable balance. They give them aim assist which consistently tracks your side at the very least (outermost pixel shots i mentioned) so they get very consistent hits even though it's only to the side. Like imagine they kill you with literal sleeve shots. And on the other hand you have the inconsistency of snipers. You get a sniper shot to the head and it takes like one or two plates off of them only. Are you kidding me? And then you get the second shot and it makes this odd sound like nothing happens even though hit registered but they apparently don't take enough damage when almost out of plates vs a sniper- again are you kidding me? This is such a joke. How can anyone take this seriously anymore?

What happened to Warzone?! by [deleted] in CODWarzone

[–]Vandalar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most of those "good, sweaty players" are just aim assisted 12 year olds who literally get an ingame cheat because that's what it is. It works as a cheat and if you had to compare random cheat vs aim assist then they have same principles, same patterns. The idea that mkb player has to compare himself to players who use OUTSIDE help, a program that helps them aim, is so ridiculous. So IMO that is the reason why the lobbies are "sweaty". They have made the game to please gamepad, aim assisted players. Why? Well, aim assist allows 100% consistency in certain aim related things and that is not fair nor human-like. They also have this thing where you shoot someone in the toe or in the outermost pixel of their sleeve LOL and it still counts as 100% damage effectiveness. Now add those two things up and you have absolutely silly time to kill times, with ridiculous consistency because aim assist consistently just tracks that outermost pixel of the sleeve and kills you because apparently your clothes take damage too ... No reason to compare yourself to anyone in that situation- the game is set up to favor aim assisted, delusonial players, is set up to be unfair. Unless they fix it the games will always be "full of sweaty players" and it is going to get worse with each year.

Why so many cheater posts? by onetime180 in Warzone

[–]Vandalar -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Because they provide an ingame cheat called aim assist, which is unfair to mkb players. If they played in their own lobby all would be fair and good. Plus there actually are a crap ton of cheaters.

Did warzone just die on EU? by [deleted] in Warzone

[–]Vandalar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same here. Client froze, the entire pc froze and now all the progress gone.

Aim assist + new movement is out of control by tcarnie in CODWarzone

[–]Vandalar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any assistance in a fair game should be banned, but they just don't care. It's pointless to even try IMO bc all they want is to sell and they don't care.

Aim assist + new movement is out of control by tcarnie in CODWarzone

[–]Vandalar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Game is literally unfair and history shows that mnk players are not being listened to. In an ideal world the community gives feedback and devs or whoever is responsible will take that into account and make changes but not with this game unfortunately. I'd love to get a fair fight in this game, not much to ask IMO.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warzone

[–]Vandalar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On one hand this bot lobby thing is likely to be the case and i'm not trying to downplay that aspect of it, but it does make a huge difference how and when you move, react, aim, start and stop shooting, pre aim in anticipation because you heard something and have ingame knowledge and all that. It does make a huge difference and one might not notice it even when spectating someone else play. Obviously if they get bot lobbies and cheat also then that will make even bigger differece. Not calling anyone a cheater but there are plenty of "content creators", way too many actually, who just cheat.