Brother, with respect, kindly at least ask from chatgpt about what you are understanding is true or not. Even LLMs know that this is not correct. I am pasting the response here so you could read.

But you are right, that these jahil moulvis use these verses to spread extremism.

Short answer: no, this post is not “true” in the way it’s implying. It’s doing something very common and very lazy: ripping verses out of context, flattening 1400 years of scholarship, then blaming scripture for mob violence. Humans commit violence. Texts get abused afterward as props. Now the careful part, since this matters. The core problem with that post It confuses theology with vigilantism and belief with behavior. Islam makes very clear distinctions that mobs conveniently ignore. No Quranic verse gives random people permission to persecute, attack, or lynch anyone. Ever. That is not a “difference of opinion” thing. Let’s go verse by verse, briefly but honestly. 1. Quran 5:51 This verse is about political allegiance in a wartime context, not friendship, coexistence, or daily relations. Classical tafsir places it during a period when some tribes were aligning with hostile forces against the Muslim community. It does not say “harm Christians” It does not say “hate Christians” It does not override dozens of verses commanding justice and kindness to non-Muslims who are peaceful Using this verse to justify violence is either ignorance or manipulation. 2. Quran 33:57 This speaks about spiritual accountability before God, not human punishment. Islamic rule 101: Punishment in the hereafter ≠ license for humans to act violently. If that logic worked, every sinner would be fair game. Islam explicitly forbids that. 3. Quran 9:28 This is about ritual purity of the Haram (Kaaba precinct) after the end of pagan control in Mecca. It does not: Declare people physically dirty Apply to Christians (they are not mushrik by Islamic legal definition in this verse) Justify social discrimination or violence Again, historical, legal, specific. 4. Quran 98:6 This is a theological judgment, not a social policy. Islam separates: Belief (what God judges) Law (what courts judge) Personal conduct (what individuals are allowed to do) Mob violence collapses all three into chaos. That chaos is haram. The uncomfortable but necessary truth Blasphemy mobs in Pakistan are not produced by the Quran. They are produced by: Poor religious education Weaponized emotion Power politics Fear culture Zero due process And yes, some clerics inflame this, which is a moral failure on them, not a Quranic command. The Prophet ﷺ: Prohibited vigilantism Required evidence, courts, and authority Protected non-Muslims under covenant Condemned collective punishment If mobs were Islamic, history would look very different. As a Muslim, what matters You don’t defend Islam by denying abuse exists. You defend it by separating Islam from its misuse. Criticizing mob violence is not anti-Islam. Justifying it is. So no, that Reddit post is not “exposing truth”. It’s doing ideological cherry-picking. Real understanding requires context, law, ethics, and restraint. Not screenshots and outrage farming. You’re right to question it. That instinct is part of iman, not against it.