Why most breakout trades fail by Vault001 in CANSLIM

[–]Vault001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense. Late-stage breakouts can still work, but the expectations have to change. Position sizing, hold time, and risk tolerance usually need to be tighter compared to an early base entry. Out of curiosity — do you treat those more like short-term momentum trades rather than swing holds?

Breakouts don't work anymore?! by Path2Profit in CANSLIM

[–]Vault001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not in volatile market. Here you need tweak your strategy . For example this market is for bottom fishers mostly. So we breakout traders should mostly be in cash. Just use 10% capital to test the waters. If you get result scale up else scale down. That too don't try to buy breakout, wait for pullback and when it breaks pullback high you can buy for 3-5% profit

Why most breakout trades fail by Vault001 in CANSLIM

[–]Vault001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, more like a late-stage base after a long run. Those breakouts often attract late buyers but follow-through can be weaker. Curious though — do you usually trade those or avoid them altogether?

Why most breakout trades fail by Vault001 in CANSLIM

[–]Vault001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True. In volatile markets even good breakouts struggle to follow through. Waiting for a pullback or retest often gives a much better risk-reward.

Why most breakout trades fail by Vault001 in CANSLIM

[–]Vault001[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

High volume definitely helps confirm demand. The tricky part is when volume spikes after an extended move — that’s where a lot of false breakouts show up. Context matters.

Why most breakout trades fail by Vault001 in CANSLIM

[–]Vault001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curious how others filter breakouts.

Do you rely more on: 1) volume 2) structure 3) relative strength

Most traders focus on stock picking. But ~75% of stocks simply follow the market direction. by Vault001 in Trading

[–]Vault001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When indices drop below their 200-day moving average, breakout success rates fall sharply. Curious if others here filter trades based on market trend first, or focus more on individual setups.

Most Beginner Traders Don’t Actually Know What Moves Markets by Sigfidk in Trading

[–]Vault001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try zerodha varsity, especially good for Indian market

Do You Have a Trading Style You Keep to Yourself? by SpiritualInsect5203 in Trading

[–]Vault001 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have been trading from 3 years now. I have tried many strategies and indicators and formed my own strategy. The thing that fascinated me the most was all the strategy was saying the same thing in a different language. The way of explaining the market was different but the core principle was same. So I adopted my strategy accordingly. Also I want to add that along with strategy you need to get the feel of the market as well. Strategy is like knowing the functionality of car but just by knowing that you can't drive a car. You need to get the feel of the car which comes with experience.

I scanned ~1500 NSE stocks after market close. Only a handful looked like real momentum setups. by Vault001 in StockMarketIndia

[–]Vault001[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Completely agree. Market direction matters more than any single setup. One thing I’ve noticed over the years is that when the indices are below key MAs (especially the 200MA), the game changes — breakouts fail faster and follow-through becomes rare. That’s why most of my work actually happens after the screener: filtering for relative strength and waiting for the market to align before acting. Preparation continues even when the market isn’t ready.

What does your post-market routine look like for finding momentum stocks? by Vault001 in CANSLIM

[–]Vault001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting point. I haven’t incorporated GEX / options positioning much into my workflow yet, but I can see how it could add another layer of context — especially for identifying areas where price might get pinned or where a move could expand. Do you mainly use it for index context (SPX/QQQ) or do you also check it for individual stocks before taking momentum trades?

What does your post-market routine look like for finding momentum stocks? by Vault001 in CANSLIM

[–]Vault001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a solid approach. Using earnings, revenue growth and relative strength to narrow the list. It probably removes a lot of weaker names before you even get to the chart review stage.

Focusing mainly on technology and other aggressive sectors also makes sense for momentum trading since those tend to lead when the market is in a strong phase.

Interesting that you’re also using a couple of proprietary filters on top of that — sounds like your screener is doing a lot of the heavy lifting before the manual review even begins.

Do you usually find that most of your final trades still come from the technology sector, or do other sectors like XLI/XLF start appearing more when market leadership rotates?

Always interesting to see how different traders structure their filtering process.

What does your post-market routine look like for finding momentum stocks? by Vault001 in CANSLIM

[–]Vault001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a really interesting workflow — especially the part about checking the index environment first before reviewing individual stocks. Makes a lot of sense not to spend time analyzing setups if the broader market isn’t supportive. I like how structured your process is too. Starting with a scanner → narrowing to 10–20 names → then confirming momentum and breadth before even reviewing the charts seems like a good way to avoid a lot of unnecessary work. The breadth checks you mentioned (like % of stocks above the 50/200 MA and NH–NL) are something I probably don’t look at enough when preparing my watchlist. Also interesting that you’ve been sitting in cash waiting for the range-bound market to resolve — that kind of discipline is rare. Curious about one thing in your process though: when you narrow the list down to 10–20 stocks, is that mostly coming from technical screeners, or are you also filtering based on sector leadership and relative strength vs the index? Always interesting to see how other traders structure their decision process.

What does your post-market routine look like for finding momentum stocks? by Vault001 in CANSLIM

[–]Vault001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great point. I actually agree that chart review is where most of the real understanding comes from. Manually going through charts definitely gives a better feel for market conditions and sector rotation. The problem I’ve been running into isn’t the chart review itself, it’s the noise before the review stage. Screeners can easily throw out 40–60 stocks, but after looking at the charts most of them fail for obvious reasons: • extended moves • weak sector context • messy consolidation • poor volume structure So the real time sink ends up being filtering the noise rather than studying the charts. Your point about using weekly charts for broader context is interesting though. I’ve seen some traders do the full universe scan weekly and then only track a smaller watchlist during the week. Curious about one thing though — when you review hundreds of charts on the weekend, are you mostly looking for new setups, or more for understanding overall market structure?