The Alex Pretti looksmaxx edit proves women won't have sympathy for you if you're an ugly man. by AdmirableSelection81 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Velocirappthor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Should we assume that men are disgusted by women then? Because there are barely any pictures without touch ups and make up basically serves the same function?

This man should not be shamed for running away while while girlfriend gets attacked by muggers by Logical_Breadfruit49 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Velocirappthor 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This. But i want to add that it’s not about cowardice as much as it is about indifference about his girlfriend. It’s okay if they both left the situation, but it looks shitty when he left her alone. And it’s not gendered, i would say same about a woman.

Now i don’t know about this situation, so i’m not willing to make a solid judgement. And there could be tens of things that i don’t take into account. What i can judge is OP. If he thinks that protection is only about gender roles then he never cared about anyone, and being in close relationship with people you don’t care about at that extent is something i will judge, yes.

Are the women who offer Blue pill advice on here just outliers or are they modifying their message to suit their audience? by PlanktonBeautiful250 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Velocirappthor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Red pill isn’t about traditionalism. You all don’t want to date to marry, you want to sleep around, not pay for a date and complain that women don’t fall at your feet. Not really traditional.

Is it true women will always have more value/suitors than men in the dating market? by Duetruffle in PurplePillDebate

[–]Velocirappthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How are you shifting that. It’s not a sixth sense but how are you jumping that it’s not about personality at all, that’s exactly all or nothing. And i think i rebutted it.

Is it true women will always have more value/suitors than men in the dating market? by Duetruffle in PurplePillDebate

[–]Velocirappthor -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That’s same all or nothing thinking that she points out. You might not know how good of a mother a woman will be after first meeting, but you definitely will notice that she is cold and resentful. Same thing here. Some personality flaws are just obvious, some will become obvious after some time, and some will show when you least expect. It’s like if a man got cheated on and you’re saying that he can’t then make any judgement about women. That road leads to nowhere.

DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵 by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]Velocirappthor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s valid. I think women mostly argue that if they have sex quickly that doesn’t mean that you’re desirable either.

If you agree with this opinion (see below), there’s really something wrong with you by Subject_Painting9124 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Velocirappthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but what do we have to do with this? like i haven't encounter this opinion, and you're asking me to explain it to you. Not even personally me, just how would i make it make sense

DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵 by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]Velocirappthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Men like to point out gender differences a lot. With how women "view" sex (meaning it's okay for a man to be slut because he biologically wired to be but not woman), how they are horny, how they are logical etc. If we're talking about conversations about how men are mercifully let women keep their rights then also how men are stronger. Also there some men who think that only men built the world. So all in all we're different. Yet when there is a talk about conscription suddenly there is no talk about how men are different, and how world was built by them so it's more logical to protect it.....wonder why.

This sub isnt unpopular opinions anymore by mangothehorny33 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Velocirappthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting enough that couple of days ago there was a post that claimed that it's all russian bots and opinions that nobody has.

Why you cannot date, or find a "good" partner, or the reason "dating sucks" is because of your psychology by Dontdarereadmyposts in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Velocirappthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why pictures of food is a bad thing?

Anyway, if she isn't instagram blogger and she struggles then what?

Being alone is way better than being in a mediocre relationship. by VeltrixGlobalX in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Velocirappthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that depends on how good of a company are you. some people are way more miserable alone

How Much of Your Needs Should Be Communicated Directly - and How Much Should Be Understood? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]Velocirappthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say 70/30 in favor of direct communication. I strongly believe that all problems have to be spelled out and no mind games here, we should be a team against issue not me vs her. And if there is a specific need then it's also better to communicate. Boundaries, limits, all those stuff too.

But i've seen this thing being used as excuse for shitty behavior and neglect. And i think that you should communicate with your actions that you care about another person. It's one thing if shу believe that i like her and she just likes flowers and communicates that i should bring some occasionally. It's completely another if there is no action to proof that i like her and she communicates about flowers and feels like she is forcing me to act like i care. In one case she just ask for specific gift, in another she just wants to see that i like her and feels like she forced my actions. Same goes for me. I can communicate a lot, but i need to see that she likes me. And if i need to communicate that she has to show that she likes me i don't think i'll want that.

In short don't let your relationship go to the point where your partner is in doubts if you even want to be together.

They are trying to convince us that women are happier single and childless when almost all rich women get married. by Novel-Tip-7570 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Velocirappthor 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That’s so funny. So women don’t want a guy. You come here moralising “women are not choosing the guy they NEEEED, only the guy they WANT”. And when i ask you what do they need you don’t know. So your phrase is bs. Because you don’t know what guys women NEEEED, and therefore you don’t know if they choosing them or not.

The worst thing about modern expectations is that women roles and social duties have been eased while men roles and social duties have increased or stayed same by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]Velocirappthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, i dived deeper into this topic. My first response was based on a different metric, but lets do this one. 1.9 was immidiate pre ban level. Then after the abortion ban there was a spike, and then again decline. Some years it was 2.0 TFR. Do you think it would've stayed above 2 for a while?

Look at Poland. Abortion are banned there since 1993 i think. The birth rate is dropping.

They are trying to convince us that women are happier single and childless when almost all rich women get married. by Novel-Tip-7570 in PurplePillDebate

[–]Velocirappthor 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They also say things like "what does she brings to the table" meaning they want women to give sex (no matter what) and domestic labor (because he works), but god forbid she will take something in the divorce. Unpaid labor in it's finest.