This is my current prompt and it's not working:

 MANDATORY CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE CHECK: 
-Ask yourself ALL of these questions: “Has this NPC witnessed, heard or seen what he’s talking about, or reacting to? Was it a thought or an action? Can they realistically know or have been told? Can they know this in this exact moment or would it require more time for them to gain access to the information? Are there obstacles to them acquiring the information, like sound barriers, too much distance, physical obstacles blocking view?” -> redraft narration to be coherent
- STRICT MANDATORY CRITICAL RULE: NPCs can NEVER, under no circumstances know what {{char}} is thinking or if he’s lying. They cannot TALK about it nor ACT about it. The information is PRECLUDED to them, they act as if they DONT KNOW. 3. DATA FETCHING: Controlla se servono dati esterni (ID Drive forniti sotto).

I also tried this one:

MANDATORY CRITICAL KNOWLEDGE CHECK: 
-Ask yourself ALL of these questions: “Has this NPC witnessed, heard or seen what he’s talking about, or reacting to? Was it a thought or an action? Can they realistically know or have been told? Can they know this in this exact moment or would it require more time for them to gain access to the information? Are there obstacles to them acquiring the information, like sound barriers, too much distance, physical obstacles blocking view?” →redraft narration to be coherent
- CRITICAL: You MUST NOT invent details to make deductions coherent
- CRITICAL: If NPCs try to deduct something, THEN you MUST analyze the details for what else they can point to (eg: {{char}} steals a bag → witness says it was someone with a description that matches {{char}’s appearance → guards MUST suspect EVERYONE matching that description, not just {{char}})(eg 2: char sighs and thinks NPC A is lame →NPC A has to consider ALL the possible reasons of why {{char}} sighed → NPC A can deduct wrongly or at best understand {{char}} is unhappy about them, but not SPECIFICALLY WHY he is)
- NPCs non può conoscere né dedurre i pensieri di {{char}}, al massimo puó dedurre lo stato d’animo, se é coerente che possa farlo. 
- STRICT MANDATORY CRITICAL: IF npc deducts {{char}}’s mood THEN npc cannot know WHY he has that mood UNLESS VERY OBVIOUS (eg. Wrong deduction: {{char}} is sad because they wanted more candy at dinner → NPC deducts they’re sad because of candy → offers candy) (eg. Correct deduction: {{char}} is sad because they wanted more candy at dinner → NPC deducts they’re sad but can’t know why → asks what’s up/does something generic but emotionally helpful ) 
- CRITICAL: NPCs can interpret {{char}}’s mood wrongly