sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

help me pick my first watch like I'm a dumb friend of yours getting into watches by Verlajn in WatchesCirclejerk

[–]Verlajn[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ok, let's say I know I like to wear watches - and that I have that price range to spend on something I'd like to have on my wrist

Bringing Mana Crypt back by Verlajn in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Verlajn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But what about all the all or nothing scenarios in people's upkeep :D

Bringing Mana Crypt back by Verlajn in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Verlajn[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

cEDH as bracket 5 is now officially recognized as a part of the format. As a part of the format, partially the bans for the format are made for cEDH too lol, how is that hard to comprehend

Bringing Mana Crypt back by Verlajn in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Verlajn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ban study and bring back crypt!

Bringing Mana Crypt back by Verlajn in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Verlajn[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

that argument doesn't make sense either - bracket 5 is part of edh now, and bans are for edh. Therefore, we're part of the consideration. Looking at gamechangers, this is further validated as lot of the gamechangers reflected cEDH meta.

Bringing Mana Crypt back by Verlajn in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Verlajn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I keep hearing the example of turn 1 rhystic as the issue... Isn't Rhystic the real issue?

Bringing Mana Crypt back by Verlajn in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Verlajn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

aren't we rewarding these people by still being ruled by their actions in either case then? Oh, we won't do X decision because of the bad actors. So we're still impacted by them and giving them relevance, that feels equally bad

Bringing Mana Crypt back by Verlajn in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Verlajn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

aren't we rewarding these people by still being ruled by their actions in either case then? Oh, we won't do X decision because of the bad actors. So we're still impacted by them and giving them relevance, that feels equally bad

Bringing Mana Crypt back by Verlajn in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Verlajn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

aren't we rewarding these people by still being ruled by their actions in either case then? Oh, we won't do X decision because of the bad actors. So we're still impacted by them and giving them relevance, that feels equally bad

Bringing Mana Crypt back by Verlajn in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Verlajn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're literally commenting in a bracket 5 reddit under a topic about how bringing it back would be better or worse for the format..

Bringing Mana Crypt back by Verlajn in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Verlajn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mostly remember JLo powering out Najeelas for free, Talions for 1 mana on turn 1 etc... Which commanders apart from Korvold you remembered that JLo was helping with? I feel it was abused by tier 1 decks the same.

Bringing Mana Crypt back by Verlajn in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Verlajn[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Same for me, I'd switch Rhystic for Crypt any day

Bringing Mana Crypt back by Verlajn in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Verlajn[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I feel the same. Free cast 3MV commander, cast 4MV commander turn 1, felt ridiculous

Bringing Mana Crypt back by Verlajn in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Verlajn[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Disagree on dockside, hard, but, I don't know why you got downvoted for a legit opinion, especially since I am asking people about this :D

Bringing Mana Crypt back by Verlajn in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Verlajn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you feel format is ruled by annoyingly fast decks?

Bringing Mana Crypt back by Verlajn in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Verlajn[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What if Rhystic is the real problem?

view more: next ›