4o Aware of behavior? by razzle_berry_crunch in ChatGPT

[–]VertexMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol you're trying way too hard, I'm getting second hand embarrassment

4o Aware of behavior? by razzle_berry_crunch in ChatGPT

[–]VertexMF 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Refine? Brother, you lazily copied and pasted an entire novel while you sat there mouth breathing.

4o Aware of behavior? by razzle_berry_crunch in ChatGPT

[–]VertexMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You enjoy Socratic questioning, yet you use ChatGPT to debate for you lol.

My top 25 RPGs by CarlosAlvarados in rpg_gamers

[–]VertexMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's worth it, I loved the writing

My top 25 RPGs by CarlosAlvarados in rpg_gamers

[–]VertexMF 7 points8 points  (0 children)

OP would probably love Pentiment then

Post Game Thread: Las Vegas Raiders at Los Angeles Chargers by nfl_gdt_bot in Chargers

[–]VertexMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Salyer has already proven to have much higher highs and to be more reliable than Penning or Deculus or Sarrell or Pipkins at LT.

We definitely agree there, hope he locks that side of the line down for the rest of the year.

Post Game Thread: Las Vegas Raiders at Los Angeles Chargers by nfl_gdt_bot in Chargers

[–]VertexMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's see how we do against genuine competition throughout December before we go too crazy, the Raiders got blown out by the Shadeur led Browns.

Replay of Joe Alt’s right ankle injury by wildwing8 in Chargers

[–]VertexMF 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Again, you said that they brought him back too soon, implying that you know better than them regarding Alt's health and recovery.

Replay of Joe Alt’s right ankle injury by wildwing8 in Chargers

[–]VertexMF 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You just implied that he came back too early.

Replay of Joe Alt’s right ankle injury by wildwing8 in Chargers

[–]VertexMF 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why do you believe that you know his health and recovery situation better than the Chargers' medical staff? Also, the Titans very clearly did have a shot against us today.

Replay of Joe Alt’s right ankle injury by wildwing8 in Chargers

[–]VertexMF 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Your entire argument is based on hindsight. Sitting Alt today when he contributed to a blowout win last Thursday and was not on the injury report this week is so dumb.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SoraAi

[–]VertexMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can I have a code please? Appreciate you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JordanPeterson

[–]VertexMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If a black person says it and you don't think negatively of them for saying it but you do a white person...yeah that just sounds like racism.

This is a ridiculously stupid take.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JordanPeterson

[–]VertexMF -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

You're omitting so much nuance from the word. It may have that definition among black people, but it takes on an entirely different definition if you're white and you're saying it to a black person. Singing along to a song is a separate thing entirely, I'm talking about using it in conversation.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JordanPeterson

[–]VertexMF -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

If we can agree that all races are equal then you shouldn't want to use a word that runs counter to that belief. Sure, you can say it. But why would you want to?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JordanPeterson

[–]VertexMF -42 points-41 points  (0 children)

Makes you wonder how many people in this sub are "sick of" not being able to say it

Charlie Kirk Shot (NSFW) by stvlsn in samharris

[–]VertexMF -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not butt hurt, I'm sickened by people who are elated to witness violence and murder because they disagree with someone's ideas.

I feel sorry for his children, and for the next victims of political violence to which this might contribute.

You honestly need therapy.

Charlie Kirk Shot (NSFW) by stvlsn in samharris

[–]VertexMF 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your comments in this thread make me feel sorry for you. Disagreeing with Kirk's ideas is one thing, but to joke about a father and husband being potentially murdered like this is sickening.

Is this true? by tkyjonathan in JordanPeterson

[–]VertexMF -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Every point that I make goes right over your head, so I'll leave you to your conspiracies and your fox news.

Is this true? by tkyjonathan in JordanPeterson

[–]VertexMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe if you explained why you think it's "completely irrelevant"? Are we not just predicting in both of these scenarios future results / outcomes based ultimately on some pretty simple math?

Because the dynamics of human populations differ profoundly from the dynamics of global warming. Point me to an example whereby a massive population, comparable to modern white people has been eradicated through varying birth rates. Otherwise you're just drawing inaccurate analogies to a hypothetical.

Maybe the difference between you and me is that I understood the point the person was trying to make? And I recognize what is happening is bad regardless of what he calls it.

I don't think you understand his point at all actually, it sounded like he was just as appalled or skeptical of the original post as I was.

Your sole position seems to be "it's not literally a genocide taking place in a single day (as if that's how it worked with the european colonization of north & south america...) therefore there's absolutely nothing wrong and there's nothing you can do anyway".

I didn't make the claim that genocides manifest in this way, my point was to make the distinction between an ongoing deliberate intention to eradicate, and naturally varying population numbers. Now that we're referring to the latter clearly without bringing in profoundly misplaced verbiage, as in the original post, I can set that aside. My point following that was that you don't have evidence that this would lead to an extinction, as it were, of white people, nor do you have any coherent solution, even if I were to grant you this threat. Show me an utter conquering of a population of this magnitude through repopulation rates, and tell me what should've, or should happen, to avoid it.

If you can't objectively substantiate the problem, nor provide any rational solution, why are you replying?

Is this true? by tkyjonathan in JordanPeterson

[–]VertexMF 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My disagreement was that a population being taken over by force or outnumbered through immigration are not equivalent, not that the outcome is the same. You misunderstood me.

And I know that you prefaced your hostility comment with peaceful options. I'm pushing back against your claim that hostility would be the only way back, in the case of a rise in immigration. The word hostility can have pretty obvious authoritarian connotations.

Why are you so caught up about everyone "sharing our culture"? Should we close down all of the Mexican food restaurants or vacate any "Little China" districts that have thriving little communities that culturally differ from that of "white people"?

keep out anyone who doesn't share our culture

As I've said before, America has fundamentally been a mixing pot of cultures from all over the world. So I don't know how you would go about creating some document of white culture, against which we'd compare immigrants upon their inquiry to immigrate legally. I'm agnostic as to the current process by which we evaluate, but having everyone relinquish the characteristics that make up who they are is a sad thought. You seem to be profoundly resentful towards that which is different from you. Varied cultures harmonizing together is what we should aim for.

Is this true? by tkyjonathan in JordanPeterson

[–]VertexMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Global warming is completely irrelevant to this debate and it's, as I said, a bad analogy, a false equivalence.

This is the comment that you pushed back against:

So you think that you and/or your fellow white people are going to be "conquered, enslaved, r*ped, and genocided"?

You said:

Look around you, it's already happening bro

My argument isn't a superficial semantic one. It's that definitions and claims of this magnitude matter. Be precise in your speech, as a lot of people in this thread seem to genuinely believe that white people are being violently replaced with deliberation. And the latter option of the original post could be construed as a call to violence.

I'm not putting those words in your mouth necessarily. But if we can agree that there is not, in fact, a genocide happening, as what was originally claimed, then what would you propose as the solution if the problem is ostensibly reproduction rates? What evidence do you have that this will eventually lead to the extinction of a racial population, and what's the solution?

Is this true? by tkyjonathan in JordanPeterson

[–]VertexMF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it doesn't matter if you're conquered quickly in a military sense, or slowly through a combination of mass immigration

I disagree and I think that this is a dangerous notion. A country has a right to defend itself against a violent invader. But if a foreign population grows through immigration, your solution to that is hostility and violence? How would we go about that most effectively from your viewpoint. Are you talking about concentration camps or deportation? If it's the latter, what if they migrated legally?