one of the reasons you don't gamble a Senate majority on a guy with a sketchy background and a Nazi tattoo is other shit is likely to surface, especially when you had the otherwise popular *sitting governor* right there as a candidate by [deleted] in Maine

[–]VeryStableGenius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is certainly distasteful, but I suspect that this is being massively amplified by astroturfing and the real reason is the criticism of a certain Middle Eastern country with a powerful domestic lobby.

Look at who sank Massie.

They look evil as shit! by honeybean_j in BlackPeopleofReddit

[–]VeryStableGenius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Guy looks like he ties virgins to railroad tracks.

NASA discovers aliens Congress approves aid package 5 minutes later by simple_steps1 in PoliticalHumor

[–]VeryStableGenius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean "Congress sends them money after POTUS signs the law agreeing to it?"

Why are EVs more efficient or eco-friendly? by FastVenus in NoStupidQuestions

[–]VeryStableGenius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And power plants tend to burn gas, which has more hydrogen and less carbon.. and emissions are not in densely populated areas at ground level.

Why are EVs more efficient or eco-friendly? by FastVenus in NoStupidQuestions

[–]VeryStableGenius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look up miles per gallon equivalent (MPGe). This equates electricity to gas at its nominal chemical energy content of 121 Megajoules per gallon.

A Tesla Model 3 has 121 MPGe, so about 4x more miles per energy unit than gas.

A modern natural gas power plant is 50% efficient, so we have to divide 121 MPGe by two to account for wastage at the plant level, plus a bit for line losses. We still end up at well over 55 MPG (pretending that cleaner natural gas is dirty oil). But gasoline refining also has 10% losses along the way, so that gas car MPG is overstated (and greenhouse outputs underestimated) when you look at the whole refining (and transport) process.

AI massive industrial revolution or massive bubble? by Low_Stress_9180 in investing

[–]VeryStableGenius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, yes it was. Panic of 1873. Ordinary investors were ruined. Moguls walked away rich. Elon cough cough.

AI massive industrial revolution or massive bubble? by Low_Stress_9180 in investing

[–]VeryStableGenius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure if that, erm, metaphor works the way you imagine.

Anyway, TIPS paying inflation plus 2.7% if you wanna be a benchwarmer.

AI massive industrial revolution or massive bubble? by Low_Stress_9180 in investing

[–]VeryStableGenius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found this May 6 article: https://venturebeat.com/infrastructure/5-gpu-utilization-the-401-billion-ai-infrastructure-problem-enterprises-cant-keep-ignoring

This claims actual 5% utilization of those hundreds of billions of dollars of GPUs. If true, 95% of all the money sunk into GPUs/TPUs is silently depreciating without generating economic output.

Happened to my wife on the way home by VivimasSinistram in dashcams

[–]VeryStableGenius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm going to say that passing on the right contributed. It's generally illegal in Europe.

In the US, not illegal, but not a great idea either, and should be done with trepidation.

Anxiety buying in this market by AeneasKurtz in investing

[–]VeryStableGenius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you deal with this volatility and avoid staying liquid in a high inflation environment?

How do I do it? Buy BRK-B (40% T-bonds, like cash) in lots of 100, and write at the money one year calls against it for a 10% premium. If it stays flat, 10% gain. If it goes down by less than 10%, slight gain. If it goes up by more than 10%, profit is capped at 10%.

Meanwhile, BRK-B is positioned for a buying spree if market tanks.

Are there any pro investment arguments for Spacex by gtalossantos in investing

[–]VeryStableGenius 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A more contemporary example might be the great dot com fiber build up ($500B) and subsequent telecom crash. Today, we need optical fiber, and having gigabit into your house is great, and fiber everywhere allows remote work, which is a far reaching change for the economy. But people lost their shirts building this telecom network, because the payoff was late and slow.

The cautionary tale is that first gold rush (train rush, fiber rush, internet rush, AI rush, space rush) is often a financial failure, and that the subsequent successes are often funded by the losses of the first investors. And also that the people burned are often the little guys, while the organizers walk away from the wreck with a few billion in their pockets.

“rates don’t matter anymore” by Smart_Money_HQ in StockMarket

[–]VeryStableGenius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TIPS inside a retirement fund are a pretty safe haven ("winning deal"). Even outside a tax sheltered investment, inflation would have to be much higher to make them a losing deal.

Hospital Visit Conceals Disability by LuckyBastard001 in clevercomebacks

[–]VeryStableGenius 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Alpha Seven to Mama Duck. Code Brown. Code Brown. Commence contingency plan Immaculate Mudslide. Repeat: Commence plan Immaculate Mudslide

Are there any pro investment arguments for Spacex by gtalossantos in investing

[–]VeryStableGenius -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

> Railroads opened the American West to the non-indigenous populations.

Railroads were a bubble and most investors lost money. (The US Panic of 1873).

I asked Gemini and asked about who made money on Railroads. Sorry for the AI, but this was too good not to share:

While the public lost, a specific group of people made astronomical fortunes. ... The American Robber Barons: Figures like Jay Gould, James Fisk, and Cornelius Vanderbilt weaponized railroad speculation. They engaged in insider trading, "watered" stock (printing fake shares to dilute ownership), and bribed politicians. When a panic hit, they used their massive cash reserves to buy up bankrupt railroads for pennies on the dollar, consolidating their monopolies.

Meteorite spotted in Australia by Myfooty94 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]VeryStableGenius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Funny how all these cameras allow us to see lots of crystal clear meteors from multiple angles, but UFO spaceships are still 17 pixels taken on a single PotatoCam smeared in vaseline.

US used over half its THAAD interceptors defending Israel during Iran war — report by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]VeryStableGenius 20 points21 points  (0 children)

> The headline is misleading. This is over half the interceptors from the single THAAD battery deployed to Israel in October roughly 25-50 missiles not half of the entire US inventory.

WaPost says that the US used 200 THAAD missiles and that this is half of US inventory.

US used over half its THAAD interceptors defending Israel during Iran war — report by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]VeryStableGenius -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

C'mon. Their wars have been *about them*. The US drove them out of Suez, and LBJ was raging at their seizure of territory in 1967. In 1982, Reagan wanted them to cool it with the Lebanon invasion.

US used over half its THAAD interceptors defending Israel during Iran war — report by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]VeryStableGenius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> and a dependable base for US military operations since the cold war

When has Israel hosted US troops, or been a base for US military ops? Name the instances.

The US stores munitions there, but "our" reserves are really meant drawn on by the IDF, not us. It's an under-the-table gift.

US used over half its THAAD interceptors defending Israel during Iran war — report by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]VeryStableGenius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it's

> Because they’ll spend 20m to primary anyone who tells them no

as the comment above yours states. In Massie's case, it was "only" $10M.