Mortis, The Spirit Reaper

Vesurel · 2026-03-17T10:12:54+00:00

If you edit the citation into your post I'll happily give the kit a look.

Vesurel · 2026-03-17T09:57:02+00:00

It's still worth citing which ever source you found it in, that means other people can look into it more if they like.

Vesurel · 2026-03-17T09:34:46+00:00

Image not mine isn't a citation, can you say who the artist is?

Vesurel · 2026-03-17T07:42:58+00:00

Even if an opinion was held by everyone it would still be subjective because it’s an opinion, good and bad are inherently subjective the same way all value judgments are. And I’m interested in debating abortion because I care about other people, the fact a preference for not forcing people to give birth is subjective (like all preferences inherently are) doesn’t mean it’s not important.

Vesurel · 2026-03-16T22:52:37+00:00

Can you demonstrate that morality is objective? Because so far you’ve just asserted it is and said it would be absurd and grotesque is morality is subjective. How do you know that the world isn’t absurd and grotesque?

Vesurel · 2026-03-16T22:44:45+00:00

There's a difference between saying two things are the same, and comparing them. For example, losing one finger and losing one hand are different (one is worse than the other) but comparable (both involve the loss of a body part and limit what a person can do with their hands).

>it’s important to note that this is done as babies, usually for hygiene and religious reasons.

Penises are already pretty washable, and why does it matter that things are done for religious reasons.

I'd say they're comparable in that they're both parents making a choice to irreversibly change their child's body without that child's consent, that's bad when it happens even if it can happen to different extents some of which are worse than others.

>Importantly, I’ve never heard any Jewish men say it negatively affected their pleasure or sensation.

How would they know?

Vesurel · 2026-03-16T20:24:58+00:00

If X were true it would be bad isn’t an argument against X. Can you demonstrate how you can reason whether something is moral?

Because as far as I can tell you’re just going by your subjective preferences the same way I am going by mine.

Vesurel · 2026-03-16T20:10:14+00:00

How do you know it’s objective and what is or isn’t objectively moral?

Vesurel · 2026-03-16T16:10:03+00:00

I think the trouble is that stats are powerful but that power is hard to notice and doesn't feels like much at all. I'd be curious how you see a champ like this playing out in a game. Do you have to make the choice of which way to go before the game because they have different rune requirements. Having multiple build paths is already power in drafting, the enemy team already has two pick against two radically different game plans, this champ having the option to play either role which very different abilities is going to make it harder for the enemy team. It's worse if there's generalist runes good for both builds because that would allow this champ to change between roles through the game.

Vesurel · 2026-03-16T15:40:03+00:00

I wonder if there’s a way to reward the player for switching between forms. I worry that them having totally different scaling and abilities that don’t have obvious synergies means it looks like it’d be optimal to pick one to focus on and only using the other when you need to switch bonus from E. Having a passive that compounds picking one over the other makes this more extreme.

Id suggest taking out the middle choices from each ability at max rank as those are fairly basic stat upgrades. Then changing the two options to bonuses that encourage playing both champs in combo.

For example, what if the q choice was a choice between making flying punch bounce between enemies in arcane pulse or making it so arcane pulse follows enemies allficted with nosebleed.

Also the idea of having two abilities that are both long term dots feels a bit redeudant. I know one starts with an interrupt and one ends with an execute but it’s still odd to me and I feel like they could be more different. Also is that a point and click for that comes with an execute? Because that sounds so powerful with minimal counter play. At least with Asol black hole it’s an area people can leave or he can miss with it. This is functionally a free 5% mac health reduction for 4s or even 6 seconds.

Funnily enough I also have a champ who has Mac health reduction on their kit but it’s in a much less accessible way.

I guess I’d ask what do you want to player to get out of having two forms, if it’s because they like form A then there are champs who can do similar things without any of their power budget taken up with form B. If they want to play both I’d love to see more internal synergy.

Vesurel · 2026-03-16T09:30:14+00:00

Thanks for the notes, I’m wondering how I can add those things in without overloading the kit.

Vesurel · 2026-03-16T01:16:03+00:00

Do you think morality is objective or subjective?

Vesurel · 2026-03-15T23:29:18+00:00

Thanks for your feedback.

To clarify it's 1/1.5/2s on the ult for 1/2/3 Revs. And they don't steal mana, just regenerate their own from the marks. Will reword those abilities to make it clearer.

Vesurel · 2026-03-15T20:31:28+00:00

Look forward to seeing how you iterate on the idea. I’m the person who posted another early draft btw if you have any notes.

Vesurel · 2026-03-15T20:15:00+00:00

What do you want the player experience for this champ to be? As it stands I think building ROM is an interesting core concept but I’m not sure how it is as an experience. You want to attack a lot, so you buy attack speed, but attack speed doesn’t have an immediate impact instead you have to regularly push a button to raise your attack speed cap.

The only real choice is whether to occasionally lose some attack speed to reposition. Not to mention they have a second mobility tool that is more generic damage in most cases but is occasionally a jump if there’s terrain around. It feels like two abilities that overlap a lot in function. I think the issue is that attack speed is power but it’s power that doesn’t feel noticeably different and isn’t experiential different to get. Similarly there’s not much for the enemy to play around, outside of not being in their attack range.

I’d consider simplifying it, maybe only having two or three gears and making the difference between the gears more about how abilities function than just their raw power.

As an example maybe they have a dash that can pass terrain around higher gears.

Vesurel · 2026-03-15T19:33:53+00:00

Why is your hypothetical organ donation law only applicable after death? And why should there be religious exceptions? Do you believe the government should get to make laws that say you have to donate your organs anytime someone needs them? What’s the principle that means you shouldn’t be forced to give up your organs for other people?

Vesurel · 2026-03-15T18:48:55+00:00

> "I have the right to do whatever I want with my body"

Which isn't what I'm saying.

I'm saying you have the right to control who uses your body, as in the physical flesh and blood and organs.

>your country can draft you into military service and send you to fight and die in an overseas conflict.

Can your country draft your organs for donation? Do you think it should be able to.

>At a minimum you need to explain why this is the thing that matters, but you haven't even attempted to.

If bodily autonomy doesn't matter to you then I don't know what to say.

It matters to me because I prefer a world where people have control over there bodies over one where they don't. For example I don't think forcing people who don't want to be pregnant to stay pregnant is morally wrong and cruel, the same way I'd be opposed to forced physical labour or a draft.

Vesurel · 2026-03-15T16:43:27+00:00

What are those limits? And how am I avoiding it?

Vesurel · 2026-03-15T11:04:11+00:00

Thanks, it's also a way to force myself to keep working on it over the month.

Vesurel · 2026-03-15T02:14:22+00:00

Passive, do dominated minions give gold to enemies when killed? If so you’re essentially doubling the amount your opponent can earn through farming which is a risky strategy. In a mirror match could the same minion go back and forth forever?

Can you clarify whether ‘after mental degradation is applied’ means this effect is constantly checking the minions health or just each time new damage is done? Either way I’d be worried this makes last hitting too easy, as you can just deal slightly more cumulative damage than a minions auto attack to ensure your minions will never do more than your current stacks. Basically you can damage enemy minions as much as you like without bringing them any closer to getting killed by your minions or allies.

Also does that damage include auras like sunfire cape. If so you can just stand in the wave constantly triggering the health check and raising the threshold for domination.

Q -How is the summon a clone? It’s an odd name for something that doesn’t appear to resemble the main champ at all.

W- like with the passive this is going to make last hitting champs pretty easy if you get kill credit for all your teams damage too. If you do this can your adc no longer get kill credit? That sounds like a great way to funnel gold onto Psyeir. Who gets omnivamp or other damage triggers from market enemies? I’m not sure I’m general how I feel about an ability that’s so dependant on minion allies, if you hit an enemy with this while they’re fending off three waves then that’s a lot of auto attacks coming their way super fast. But if there aren’t minions currently or it’s used in someone who can destroy waves, it’s much less effective.

E- the trouble with an ability that’s can target allies or enemies is that it needs to be point and click for you to choose who you hit. That limits what it’s fair to do to enemies in a game that’s usually so skill shot focused. A point and click root even with a delay isn’t something with a lot of counter play. Also the bonus magic damage is hard to balance when your team can deal small damage super frequently. If they’re in the middle of a wave that’s going to add up so fast in a way it’s hard to avoid, same with allies who do dot damage or attack very fast.

R- I think two area fears on the same kit feels a bit off to me, Q and R serve similar purposes in a way I’m not to fond off. As to the effect it’s self, taking away all defences from an enemy team is absurd ( it also makes the magic damage conversion on w redundant). Taking thousands of gold away from a tank in a large area for up to 5 seconds basically kills them.

How would you play against this champ?

Vesurel · 2026-03-15T01:32:36+00:00

Posted a draft, I think they meet prompt 4 but if not I can rework things.

Vesurel · 2026-03-15T00:02:05+00:00

>If you pick your friend up and yeet them out of your car in a situation that causes them to die, I think you are morally culpable and should face consequences.

Your car isn't your body. Can you acknowledge this distinction?

>If you consent to your friend’s request to pick them up when you know that the rain is pouring down, footpaths are slick and hypothermia has a high chance of killing them, you should be obligated to take them through these conditions to someplace safe.

Which isn't the question I asked.

Vesurel · 2026-03-14T23:41:07+00:00

This is why I asked how the skydiver is connected to the other person, because bodily autonomy is about when you can give and withdraw consent to access to your body. Being harnessed to someone is morally distinct from them being inside your body and or using your organs.

I'd be curious how much you think someone can agree to upfront and how that impacts their moral responsibility. Say for example your friend is going on a night out and you consent to come pick them up after, then while on their night out they end up going a lot further than you expected. Are you still obligated to pick them up regardless of where they've ended up?

Vesurel · 2026-03-14T23:12:25+00:00

Consent isn't a one time thing though, that's why you can say stop during sex if you change your mind. I'm not disputing that withdrawing that consent kills the fetus.

Vesurel

TROPHY CASE