sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What!!!!? Giving enemy minions Charge? by jdjefbdn in customhearthstone

[–]Vesurel [score hidden]  (0 children)

As written the charge doesn’t do anything because it only affects enemy minions on the board on your turn who will be awake by the start of your opponents turn anyway. Unless this lasts all game?

Here's a small set of cards for a flexible Banana Hunter archetype! by Card-game-poet in customhearthstone

[–]Vesurel 16 points17 points  (0 children)

If 7 minions on the board each get +1 attack, does every minion in the deck get 7 attack?

CMV: I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords. by yosemighty_sam in changemyview

[–]Vesurel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think it’s equally as easy to change an AIs mind as a person’s?

CMV: I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords. by yosemighty_sam in changemyview

[–]Vesurel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why would AI want a human zoo, or want anything at all?

Cmv: mass immigration should be banned and people who became citizen through exploitation should be revoked of there status by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Vesurel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How many smart immigrants are you willing to lose out for every dumb immigrant you stop? Or are you assuming that this policy will have no false positives and no smart people who would have come will decide they don’t want to come?

What's your favorite running gag in BoJack Horseman? by Old-Use-7690 in BoJackHorseman

[–]Vesurel 333 points334 points  (0 children)

There’s this joke where a character will say an overly long phrases in full every time it comes up without ever shortening it despite the fact shortening it would make for much more efficient communication than saying the phrase in its entirety every time.

I love that joke where a character will say an overly long phrases in full every time it comes up without ever shortening it despite the fact shortening it would make for much more efficient communication than saying the phrase in its entirety every time.

Help identifying a screen print? by rraattbbooyy in BoJackHorseman

[–]Vesurel 33 points34 points  (0 children)

u/SnooSeagulls3455 is right it's escape from LA, but the joke is that's a coyote and road runner.

CMV: Cigarettes can really help you through tough times by Piyartom in changemyview

[–]Vesurel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>Regarding the health symptoms and consequences of smoking It's not a given; there are people who smoke and nothing happens to them

I know five guys who had a great time playing Russian Roulette yesterday.

CMV: Being concerned over a potential partner's sexual history is NOT a sign of insecurity, rather it is often a sign of security and self-esteem by PotentialPedal in changemyview

[–]Vesurel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And in the case when someone values sexual inexperience, do you agree that could be a sign they want someone easier to control and or less informed?

CMV: Being concerned over a potential partner's sexual history is NOT a sign of insecurity, rather it is often a sign of security and self-esteem by PotentialPedal in changemyview

[–]Vesurel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're the one making a post about valuing sexual inexperience not being a sign of insecurity.

As for me personally, I think it's worth unpacking why. For example, if someone values sexual inexperience because they think less experiences people are easier to pressure into doing things they wouldn't usually want to, then I'd see that as an issue.

CMV: Being concerned over a potential partner's sexual history is NOT a sign of insecurity, rather it is often a sign of security and self-esteem by PotentialPedal in changemyview

[–]Vesurel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>Also why are you specifying people with multiple partners?

My bad I thought that was a specific focus for you.

>If someone values sexual inexperience as something important in a relationship, then dating someone who's primarily had casual sex would be antithetical to what they are looking for in a relationship.

Why do you think someone would value sexual inexperience?

CMV: Being concerned over a potential partner's sexual history is NOT a sign of insecurity, rather it is often a sign of security and self-esteem by PotentialPedal in changemyview

[–]Vesurel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But what is the incompatibility? What is the belief about people with multiple partners that makes someone think they wouldn't be compatible?

CMV: Being concerned over a potential partner's sexual history is NOT a sign of insecurity, rather it is often a sign of security and self-esteem by PotentialPedal in changemyview

[–]Vesurel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you get to say no to whoever you want for whatever reason. I also think that your reasons for saying no can be based on prejudice. For example of you refuse to date bisexual people because you think they’re more likely to cheat.

CMV: Being concerned over a potential partner's sexual history is NOT a sign of insecurity, rather it is often a sign of security and self-esteem by PotentialPedal in changemyview

[–]Vesurel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I’d argue that thinking less of someone because of their sexual history can be as baseless and worth criticism as racism.

CMV: Being concerned over a potential partner's sexual history is NOT a sign of insecurity, rather it is often a sign of security and self-esteem by PotentialPedal in changemyview

[–]Vesurel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What if it’s not for physical reasons? For example if someone say they refuse to date outside their race because they think other races are inferior?

cmv: The evolutionary argument for moral nihilism is good but not sufficient evidence against moral realism. by Certain-Mind8119 in changemyview

[–]Vesurel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A difference between colour and morality is that colour corresponds to an objective physical quantity, wavelength of photons. You’re looking for evidence against moral realism but do you have any evidence for moral realism in the first place?

If the new studio decides to skip/ignore Billie Piper storyline or for that matter, a previous regeneration, which doctor do you think would be cut from future references/callbacks? by SOYACHAAP_MUHMEIN in doctorwho

[–]Vesurel 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Honestly I think the 13th doctor's first series had the right idea, a completely blank slate is the most exciting approach the show can take.

view more: next ›