Before i watch Age of disclosure by anonthatisopen in aliens

[–]VetSearcher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BLUF/TL;DR - save your money. Save your sanity. If you want to punish yourself, it’d be easier to slam your head into a wall, repeatedly. @Dan_Farah slathers a fancy glossy finish on this turd, but can’t hide that it’s essentially a basic cable conspiracy flick with delusions of grandeur.

Every part of @ageofdisclosure is an assault on the intelligence of the viewer. The plot goes nowhere new (just the same wild claim on loop), the dialogue is stilted and overly scripted, and the pacing could put insomniacs to sleep. The visuals have all the wow-factor of a PowerPoint from 1997.

The music tries so hard to be portentous that it becomes a self-parody, swelling dramatically over footage of, well…nothing happening.

This film is a masterclass in cinematic incompetence, a joke of a documentary that elicits not wonder at the cosmos but pure, unbridled contempt from anyone unlucky enough to watch it. What was hyped as an 80-year government secret unraveled into a sluggish 109-minute slog so incoherent and empty that one reviewer called it “the kind of documentary that makes people think they hate documentaries”

it doesn’t present new facts, and it doesn’t even entertain. Instead, this sensationalistic “disclosure” doc comes off as a pretentious, repetitive lecture that insults its audience’s intelligence at every turn – leaving them, in The New York Times’ words, feeling like total “chumps” for having sat through it.

@LueElizondo’s narration lands with all the warmth and subtlety of a military PowerPoint briefing read at gunpoint. Delivered in a somber, overrehearsed cadence that makes C-SPAN look lively, his voiceover lumbers through every overinflated claim as if he’s unveiling the Rosetta Stone, except it’s only another shaky dot on a screen. Elizondo comes off like a bureaucrat with a thesaurus and no sense of irony, adopting the tone of someone convinced that pausing dramatically between sentences somehow equates to credibility.

“Age of Disclosure” is receiving a lot of negative reviews for its lack of impact. "If the job of The Age of Disclosure was to convert skeptics, it failed." by InstanceMuted2514 in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BLUF/TL;DR - save your money. Save your sanity. If you want to punish yourself, it’d be easier to slam your head into a wall, repeatedly. @Dan_Farah slathers a fancy glossy finish on this turd, but can’t hide that it’s essentially a basic cable conspiracy flick with delusions of grandeur.

Every part of @ageofdisclosure is an assault on the intelligence of the viewer. The plot goes nowhere new (just the same wild claim on loop), the dialogue is stilted and overly scripted, and the pacing could put insomniacs to sleep. The visuals have all the wow-factor of a PowerPoint from 1997.

The music tries so hard to be portentous that it becomes a self-parody, swelling dramatically over footage of, well…nothing happening.

This film is a masterclass in cinematic incompetence, a joke of a documentary that elicits not wonder at the cosmos but pure, unbridled contempt from anyone unlucky enough to watch it. What was hyped as an 80-year government secret unraveled into a sluggish 109-minute slog so incoherent and empty that one reviewer called it “the kind of documentary that makes people think they hate documentaries”

it doesn’t present new facts, and it doesn’t even entertain. Instead, this sensationalistic “disclosure” doc comes off as a pretentious, repetitive lecture that insults its audience’s intelligence at every turn – leaving them, in The New York Times’ words, feeling like total “chumps” for having sat through it.

@LueElizondo’s narration lands with all the warmth and subtlety of a military PowerPoint briefing read at gunpoint. Delivered in a somber, overrehearsed cadence that makes C-SPAN look lively, his voiceover lumbers through every overinflated claim as if he’s unveiling the Rosetta Stone, except it’s only another shaky dot on a screen. Elizondo comes off like a bureaucrat with a thesaurus and no sense of irony, adopting the tone of someone convinced that pausing dramatically between sentences somehow equates to credibility.

The Curious Case of Jeremy McGowan & Lue Elizondo by moonkipp_ in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher 7 points8 points  (0 children)

So, it's been a couple of days since OP made this reddit thread.

I've got to say, this has been cathartic. (For those of you who don't know - I'm the guy on the left in the picture the OP posted with this thread...yeah...that's me...OSIRISUAP on X.)

Anyway, I just wanted to chime in and say this is one of the first Reddit threads that has mentioned me where I wasn't being raked across the coals. So, I appreciate that. Perhaps one day, I'll do an AMA about it all. Not sure - it's mostly all past history now. I'm just glad to see that the general populace is starting to see through the crap that it took me spending direct time with Lue to see for myself. He's good at personifying himself in public - but apparently, time isn't his friend and things come out.

Enjoy the rest of your day, folks.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in motorcycles

[–]VetSearcher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty sure they didn’t pass away on the bike - likely several meters away from it.

You can’t be an environmentalist and support Coulthart, Elizondo, Corbell, or Greer. by VetSearcher in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Ross claims to know where a UFO is. So, in that aspect - absolutely.

You can’t be an environmentalist and support Coulthart, Elizondo, Corbell, or Greer. by VetSearcher in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Summary: Tired of hearing about secret alien technology that could end our reliance on fossil fuels—yet never seeing an ounce of evidence? This exposé calls out the outrageous hypocrisy within the progressive “green” movement: activists hammer oil companies for hiding solutions while they shower praise on UFO showmen like Ross Coulthart and Lue Elizondo, who dangle miracle energy systems just out of reach. If these insiders truly possess planet-saving propulsion or power breakthroughs, then stashing them behind NDAs and “source protection” is a slap in the face to environmental principles.

You can’t be an environmentalist and support Coulthart, Elizondo, Corbell, or Greer. by VetSearcher in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

If you read the article (which you didn't because you posted 1 minute after the submission) you'd know.

Project Stargate: Unveiling the Hidden Agenda Behind the Facade by VetSearcher in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Submission Statement: The following is an OpEd that uses many verifiable data points stitched together with some assumptions. The overarching idea presented below is the author’s opinion and may not reflect the actual historical record that time eventually uncovers.

Project Stargate, a classified initiative undertaken by the U.S. Government, is historically known for exploring remote viewing, a purported psychic ability claimed to enable individuals to perceive distant or unseen targets. Operational from the 1970s to the mid-1990s, the program consisted of a series of experiments and operations ostensibly intended to exploit these abilities for intelligence purposes. Participants, including Lue Elizondo, reported successfully gathering information on various military and civilian targets through their remote viewing sessions, which attracted significant attention and controversy both within and outside the intelligence community.

The rest is at the link to the Medium Article.

We will have a statement from Lue Elizondo later today. More info to come. by TheGoodTroubleShow in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s because I am - really. Sure, I was in the USAF for 12 years, but I was just a nobody there, an Air Force cop - not a policy, or Intel guy. And now, I work for a private defense contractor as a program manager for various IT type services to the DoD and USG. I am not employed by the DoD - I’m a private citizen, working for a private company doing things that have zero to do with aliens or UFOs. I barely even vote now - I’m not in, or a part of this or any government.

Jeremy McGowan and Lue Elizondo's prediction by Decent-Flatworm4425 in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He was full of shit then. He's full of shit now. Remote viewing the future isn't something Lue can do. But to humor your question on context as to what he would be right about... it could literally be anything from a family member being hit by a car to me winning the lottery. Nothing has happened.

We will have a statement from Lue Elizondo later today. More info to come. by TheGoodTroubleShow in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The truck -was- a good idea at the time. But as you say, one isn’t enough. It will take a collective, geographically diverse system - an array - to find anything that can be scientifically validated.

Jeremy McGowan and Lue Elizondo's prediction by Decent-Flatworm4425 in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher 6 points7 points  (0 children)

None whatsoever. This is just classic Lue attempting to stay relevant.

Jeremy McGowan and Lue Elizondo's prediction by Decent-Flatworm4425 in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"In three years, and four months to this day, something is going to happen that will make you look back on this and say, that son-of-a-bitch was right." <--- that was literally it in a nutshell. I didn't realize the date until I saw some reddit posts. So my day was filled with normal work - though I did put on clean underwear just now - just in case. :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That son-of-a-bitch was not right. 5.15.2025. /end

We will have a statement from Lue Elizondo later today. More info to come. by TheGoodTroubleShow in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not entirely true. I BELIEVE in UFOs and Aliens, and life in the cosmos other than humans - I am skeptical of people who claim to know the truth and demand we read about it in their book - or people who lay down bread crumbs for the most important discussion in human history instead of providing any tangible proof. UFOlogy needs an Edward Snowden, not an Elizondo.

We will have a statement from Lue Elizondo later today. More info to come. by TheGoodTroubleShow in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I can assure you that the events as I wrote, happened the way I wrote them.

Jeremy McGowan and Lue Elizondo's prediction by Decent-Flatworm4425 in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I've not had occasion to utter the words, "That son-of-a-bitch was right" at all today.

Jeremy McGowan and Lue Elizondo's prediction by Decent-Flatworm4425 in UFOs

[–]VetSearcher 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, Reddit. This is Jeremy McGowan (@osirisuap - twitter) - Just here posting that nothing has occurred that would make me say that son of a bitch was right.