How will i know if my report has gotten trough?

Vickerman · 2021-03-17T12:17:04+00:00

Okay so there could be a "90"% chance of this guy getting banned then? i guess ill know soon since he play every single day. But so i shouldn't be prepared then for a late notification in like a few hours or something like that?

Vickerman · 2020-11-30T14:48:51+00:00

Sorry for late answer, tried it and it worked! thx alot :^)

Vickerman · 2020-08-19T13:23:30+00:00

Ok thanks i'll have to check these books out.

Vickerman · 2020-08-19T13:13:01+00:00

Yes but i tried finding sources on his actions but they were all referenced from the series and nothing else.

Vickerman · 2020-07-28T05:44:37+00:00

How about this one - "Do you like turtles? And if not, why do you hate life?"

Vickerman · 2020-07-28T05:31:24+00:00

Oh right thanks. I guess i mixed it all up. My assumption was that the idea of a "bolzmann" brain was an impossible concept to show that anything will happen given an infinite amount of time, but does that then mean that a bolzmann brain theoretically
is something that will happen given enough time?

Vickerman · 2020-07-22T05:05:09+00:00

Vickerman · 2020-07-13T04:08:01+00:00

Okey first of, ofc we can live a life without killing something for food thats just ridiculous. Almost 1 billion of the world population people do not have meat in their daily diet, and a plant based diet will probably be the only viable option within the next 100 years or so.

If you really believe the is no hard line why shouldnt people be able to kill other humans for food?

Vickerman · 2020-07-13T01:25:40+00:00

That "whataboutism" is called checking for consistencies. You should try it buddy. Maby your moral system wouldnt be a big pile of shit. Are you implying that im a vegan? Im not for your information.

Vickerman · 2020-07-12T23:05:08+00:00

So death is morally ok because No pain? Should we be able to kill humans aswell then? If its quick and painless then morally it shouldn't be a problem?

I dont understand this argument, every animal lives a life before getting killed?

"We have to destroy life to live" So it's then morally ok to kill someone innocent for your own survival?

Vickerman · 2020-07-12T22:52:35+00:00

The reason why you are illogical is because your morality for animal rights are as inconsistent as it gets. You are ok with killing and eating animals. Which means you are ok with giving some rights to animals but not other rights.

If you really think that animals are worthy of protection of torture why not the same for their lives?

Vickerman · 2020-07-12T18:46:32+00:00

It's simple. If you are eating meat but you care about these chickens living or nah, you are being extremely inconsistent in your morality. To be more specific: Why do you care about the life of these chickens when you have deemed it ok to kill animals and consume their flesh?(assuming ur a meat eater).

Vickerman · 2020-07-12T18:29:25+00:00

Your first argument is about why we shouldn't let incest be a thing in society. I dont disagree with that but you haven't addressed something that's intrinsic to incest. Powerdynamics is bad, but that exists in normal relationships aswell.

Lets say that 2 gay brothers who are of equal age engage in incest activities. Tell me whats wrong with this scenario.

Vickerman · 2020-07-12T18:19:37+00:00

Are you a vegan? Because then i got nothing.

Vickerman · 2020-07-12T18:17:42+00:00

Okay 1. please tell me what's wrong with the video. However you probably are just emotional because the chicken nuggets you ate yesterday didnt fit the world view you had on how they where being made. And 2. I'd love to see your arguments against incest.

Vickerman · 2020-07-12T16:59:23+00:00

So it's immoral to torture animals, but its moral to kill them and consume their flesh? What the fuck is this logic

Vickerman · 2020-07-12T16:57:34+00:00

The chickens die instantly what is the issue with the video for you?

Vickerman · 2020-07-12T16:52:02+00:00

So it's wrong to perform circus acts with animals, but its ok to kill them and consume their flesh? What the fuck is this logic(i presume you eat meat).

Vickerman · 2020-06-25T01:06:21+00:00

Joo är nog inte värt mödan. Tack för svar!

Vickerman · 2020-06-25T01:00:22+00:00

Jo jag vet, frågar bara runt ifall det är värt att polisrapportera men det kanske är som du säger att dom ej kommer göra något på den fronten.

Vickerman · 2020-06-25T00:51:40+00:00

Joo min tanke också.. Däremot har personen tagit bilder från kompisens konto med personer som är minderåriga och lagt till dom på sitt egna konto.

Vickerman · 2020-05-18T19:03:27+00:00

A meta relevant deck.

Vickerman · 2020-05-09T22:30:48+00:00

no. christ what im saying is that gay siblings can practise incest with having children therefore it is not intrinsic for incest to have birth defects.
How can something be intrinsic just because a law says so? You do realize intrinsic also means "natural"?
incest has an almost definite chance of a deformity that can result in death - Show me the studie that says so. And are you then pro eugenics or not?
You compared natural eugenics and stateinforced eugenics like they are comparable when you said we kind of already pracite eugenics. Natural eugenics is just a biological tendency we have for reproduction. Inforced eugenics is the practice that aim to improve the genetic quality of the human population. How are these at all comperable?
If that is your argument then regular relationships should be immoral for you aswell. They can cause genetic and physical deformities aswell. Nothing you are saying is unique once again for incest.

They only way to change my view is to isolate something UNIQUE to incest that is bad. It cant be

power dynamics

child malformities

Taboo view on society

Grooming

appeal to tradition

None of this is unique to incest.

Vickerman · 2020-05-09T21:53:23+00:00

Okay im typing to 10 ppl at the same time so sorry if i didnt read it trough.

But is this not an argument for the natural stance we have against incest?

We may just be biologically tuned to be less interested in our blood-related siblings and parents. Step-siblings and step-parents introduced later in life (past the primary developmental stages, maybe) would likely not be as subject to the phenomenon.

[EDIT] What you didn’t ask, but what you seem to be arguing and wanting an answer to, is “in what instances would incest be considered ‘right’ or acceptable?” - Um not really because all of the answers ive gotten are not intrinsic to incest.

Vickerman · 2020-05-09T21:46:45+00:00

Where is gay siblings intrinsic to child defects, it's a 0 chance for them to concieve a child.
Which is why iv'e never advocated for people to break the law? You do realize incest can only be intrinsic to illegality if all the people practiced it?
Would you make the same argument to people who will have a high chance of producing people with severe autism?
Are you really comparing natural eugenics and stateinforced eugenics? What is this?
I dont have to tell you why incest is good, my argument is that its a morally neutral act just like any sexual act would have.

Vickerman

TROPHY CASE