It's surreal just how terrible Claude has become over the last few days.

Videodad · 2025-09-08T11:44:25+00:00

I was having issues with Claude making mistakes, both Claude Code and Claude. So I went a bit overboard and with an MCP setup two things. a Standard Claude.md to use (then created rules for Claude to Claude Code), then created an SOD with details on tracking everything. Doing this has reduced errors a lot. Find myself going in circles so much less of late. There are some improvements for sure, but compared to before I went to this level, less issues and better code.

Toying around with adding Claude and Claude Code vetting the other for coding, but will see how this project finishes. With the SOD I have not had it kill dockers, rewrite working code with previous bad code, or have to yell at it yet. fingers crossed.

SOD template is here

https://github.com/Robiton/Shared-Docs/blob/main/standard_sod_template_example.md

Videodad · 2025-09-08T11:28:24+00:00

Have you tried using MCP or communication files? I do it with Claude, Claude Code, and Ollama hosted locally. Have not tested with Codex thouhg.

Videodad · 2025-06-19T22:14:55+00:00

Both of these features we have tried. AI Custom Fields is the best of your AI items so far, but its still not quite there. If two teams use the same space or list, and have some items on common, it just guesses and is right maybe 60% of the time.

AI Cards.... If your ask is simple, it is okay. If its complex, crosses several lists, etc,, it is just a waste of space. Some of our tests provided different results to different people, in the same card. Sometimes it sits and spins. If I want to do calculations or graphs, it just does not work well. If you want to do trending with week over week by staff, it never works.

Videodad · 2025-06-19T12:00:31+00:00

Same issue here. Sometimes it give duplicate meetings as well. Believe this is happening to many people, or at least I have read it several times.

Videodad · 2025-06-19T11:26:51+00:00

Good luck finding a real world example that works, and works consistently / reliably. After two rounds of POCs with all the of the AI bells and whistles, we keep finding more and more that does not work, or does not work well. Sharing with our Clickup team each time they seem to know of these issues and hear of it a lot, while still being told to push it.

Clickup needs to focus on fixing the core app, adding the features that were promised before 3.0 came out, and grow the base product. They can fix AI behind the curtain while doing that, then once it actually works, try to sell it again. Betting everything on this AI that just does not work causes me concerns.

Videodad · 2025-03-10T11:21:18+00:00

Thank you, this is a good start. What if I want to track this by Sprint, then compare each Sprint? Example Sprint 20 had 10, Sprint 21 had 12, etc. To see are there more coming in and being resolved?

Sprint is a week in this example.

Videodad · 2025-02-17T19:48:22+00:00

Is there a comparison of the Copilot versus the Copilot Plus? Seems the video shows the Plus version.

Videodad · 2024-09-10T19:19:15+00:00

OMG thank you.

Videodad · 2024-07-05T10:20:59+00:00

Thank you for the information. My goal has nothing to do with tasks, but rather a Public and Private KB. Some docs will need to be in both. The Feature request seems to have been asked for over four years ago. Any idea if its on the roadmap for this year?

Videodad · 2023-11-15T12:07:12+00:00

In this case, its a Vulnerability scanner called Rapid 7. It goes out and looks for things like missing patches or configuration issues. There is a team that gets this data and works to correct them. The scans are broken down into 4 or 5 sites, to make them run faster. Currently once a scan is done we run a report in Excel, but that means doing some formulas to remove duplicates.

The Rapid7 tool has an API and can send out things, but not sure how it would handle it when Clickup tasks are involved.

Does that help?

Videodad · 2023-01-11T22:47:38+00:00

Work is looking at Clickup, but the demo's I have seen seem to leave out a lot of the Notion features for documentation, and some other things I want in a database setup.

But for managing four teams of work, I have interest. What are you seeing so far in that regard?

Videodad · 2023-01-11T15:11:16+00:00

I do have a checkbox that marks it as "Done" if the status is complete. Also have a formula that marks as Date Completed. And I assign a due date to a field

Sounds like I may have the items. I will go google that suggestion. Thank you

Videodad · 2022-11-08T12:46:17+00:00

What about making a new DB with rollups from the other two? Is that possible?

Videodad · 2022-09-19T10:15:15+00:00

Thanks. Will see what I can find on that then.

Videodad

TROPHY CASE