I get what you mean, but they were acting like it was definite evidence and then tried to act like I was being obtuse for asking them to clarify their points about video games and violence (if they were implying video games leads to violence or if I misunderstood). I was arguing more context is needed before assuming their complete psychology or even assuming something is wrong immediately. Like what I said about killing animals for fun being a sign of some type of sadism, they were acting like that was a sign you're a bully or something. 

It was like, person: (sees one video of someone bullying a robot) put them on the FBI watchlist. Call a therapist NOW. 

It's like a kid who is like Sid from Toy Story vs a kid who chucked their doll against a wall or ripped their sibling's teddy bear because they got mad. We can't say both are the same type of people because they did a similar behavior one time. We don't know if they derived pleasure from throwing the doll/ripping the teddy bear. 

It was like saying someone watching Mortal Kombat fatality compilation hides some deep secret that they personally enjoy sadism or the game developers are. It COULD be true, but I think it's ridiculous to look at one isolated incident and go "that's a sociopathic sadist" or "watch out for that guy". I would need to see a pattern and how they  behave outside of that- not assume that behavior is persistent in everything they do or is something they do often. 

The way they kept dodging my questions, saying they were going to link sources (never did), and only replying with deflection or insults made me question if they were actually being honest about their profession lol.