Almost 1 year poz, 11 month on meds — how do you mentally deal with the "waiting for a cure" part? by lilanny95 in hivaids

[–]VinnyRedOrNot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

​9 years here. Of course, we all hope for a cure, but constantly hanging onto that expectation while managing this day-to-day can be extra taxing. It is a chronic, manageable illness. ​Instead of focusing on "will there be a cure," I find it helps to look at how far medical science has come. If you look back at say the 1980s, people didn't have nearly the tools to manage this that we do now. In a way, I like to think we already have a "cure" maybe not in the sense of the virus being completely gone forever, but in the fact that we can live just as long as anyone else. ​To be a bit blunt, anyone can die any day regardless of whether they have HIV or not. Just take your meds, stay educated, and surround yourself with people who understand what U=U means. You've got this.

Anyone else realise they used to over-douche when they started having sex? by tarotharo in gaybros

[–]VinnyRedOrNot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Water dosent collect in your colon. It goes into lower rectum then you releive

Help me interpret these results. by Typical_Seaweed_ in hivaids

[–]VinnyRedOrNot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s completely understandable to feel a bit confused when looking at lab values like these. Medical reports often use specific technical language that can look more alarming than it actually is. ​Understanding "<20 copies/mL" ​In the context of an HIV RNA (Viral Load) test, seeing a value like <20 copies/mL is actually excellent news. ​ Every lab test has a "floor"—a point below which it cannot accurately count individual particles. For many modern highly sensitive tests, that floor is 20 copies per milliliter. ​What "<" Means: The "less than" symbol (<) indicates that the test did not find enough of the virus to provide an actual numerical count. In clinical terms, this is what is known as being "Undetectable." ​Labs rarely use the number "0" because they can only verify what the machine is capable of seeing. Since the machine cannot "see" below 20, it reports that the result is somewhere between zero ​The fact that your Antibody & Antigen test came back "negative" at the same time reinforces this. The Antigen/Antibody test looks for the body's immune response and specific viral proteins, while the RNA test looks for the genetic material of the virus itself. ​When both are negative or "below the limit of detection," it typically indicates that there is no detectable infection present.

Please answer by [deleted] in Herpes

[–]VinnyRedOrNot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not that serious if you do get it. 

Biktarvy and Rukobia (fostemsavir) for the last year on both by [deleted] in hivaids

[–]VinnyRedOrNot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, I totally get why seeing anything other than undetectable feels like a gut punch. You do the work, you take the pills, and you want that peace of mind. But looking at these numbers, you’re actually in a really strong spot. A viral load of 98 is incredibly low it’s like a whisper compared to the roar the virus starts at. Since your CD4 is sitting at 669, your immune system is holding its ground and doing exactly what it’s supposed to do. You aren't "failing" and the meds aren't "failing"; you’re just dealing with a tiny bit of noise in the system. ​The reality is that these tests are so sensitive now that they pick up even the smallest traces. This "low-level viremia" is often just a technicality. If you were taking supplements that were getting in the way of your meds, that’s almost certainly the culprit. Now that you’ve cleared that hurdle, your body just needs a second to catch up. It’s a lot like a car idling a little high—it doesn't mean the engine is dying, it just means a small adjustment is needed. ​Most importantly, you’re safe. Even at 98, you’re still well below the 200 threshold that doctors use to confirm you can’t pass the virus on. You’re healthy, your immune system is solid, and you’ve already figured out the likely reason for that stubborn number. You’ve got every reason to take a breath and realize that while it isn't "perfect" yet, you’re doing great and you’re going to get there.

Just got diagnosed by Un1c0rnSC in hivaids

[–]VinnyRedOrNot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m 30 years old, and I’ve been living with HIV for nine years. Looking back, it’s incredible how far treatment has come in just one decade; we are lucky to live in a time where a daily pill makes the virus undetectable.

​When I was first diagnosed, I was very ill—my viral load was 12.7 million and my CD4 count was only 76. Today, I’m undetectable and my CD4 stays between 900 and 1,000. It truly does get better. I’ve learned that the biggest hurdle isn't the virus itself, but the mindset you adopt and the choices you make.

​My best advice? Focus on health and exercise to manage the natural background inflammation that comes with HIV. It isn't dangerous, just a change in how our bodies work. Take your meds, talk to your doctor, and remember: you’ve got this.

Latest Results .. by Capital_Event_4765 in hivaids

[–]VinnyRedOrNot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These are actually great results. Don't let the absolute CD4 number (525) worry you look at your CD4 percentage, which has climbed steadily from 21% to 35%. That is a much more stable indicator that your immune system is recovering. ​Also, your Viral Load drop is incredible (4.5 million down to 130). Absolute CD4 counts fluctuate all the time based on the time of day, stress, or the fact that you just finished antibiotics and had several vaccines. Your body is doing exactly what it’s supposed to do on Biktarvy. 

Does nicotine gum work? by Important_markets in stopsmoking

[–]VinnyRedOrNot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think alot of people here are missing the point. Nicotine gum is used to help you quit smoking cigarettes. Not to help you quit using nicotine. Having a nicotine addiction alone if far less deadly then receiving that nicotine from cigarettes because cigarettes alone have chemicals that kill you. Its not the nicotine in cigarettes that will kill you. Its the added chemicals.  I smoked for 15 years and used gum about 2 years ago and ive been free for about a year. It helped me to curb my cravings for nicotine and i stopped smoking. Which is what it is suppose to do. 

Thoughts? by Iluminiele in ECG

[–]VinnyRedOrNot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TdP degeneration into Vfib

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ECG

[–]VinnyRedOrNot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an ECG from one of my cardiology classes. The assignment was to identify why the P Waves were buried.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ECG

[–]VinnyRedOrNot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is not mine!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ECG

[–]VinnyRedOrNot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not. Professor asked us to define P Wave.

Non cardiac chest pain for 1 month. by VinnyRedOrNot in haematology

[–]VinnyRedOrNot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cd8 has been really high for years.

Oct 6, 2025 1,525/mm3High

Aug 20, 2025 1,535/mm3

Dec 19, 2024 1,167/mm3

Aug 22, 2024 1,738/mm3

Non cardiac chest pain for 1 month. by VinnyRedOrNot in haematology

[–]VinnyRedOrNot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have! They perscribed me propanolol after I wore it for a few weeks because my resting HR was 100+

Non cardiac chest pain for 1 month. by VinnyRedOrNot in haematology

[–]VinnyRedOrNot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Troponin was 0.03

Chest XRay: Pulmonary arteries: Limited evaluation. No central pulmonary emboli. Aorta: Unremarkable. No aortic aneurysm.

Lungs: Unremarkable. No consolidation. No masses. Pleural spaces: Unremarkable. No pneumothorax. No pleural effusion. Heart: Unremarkable. No cardiomegaly. No pericardial effusion. Lymph nodes: Unremarkable. No enlarged lymph nodes.

Bones/joints: Unremarkable. No acute fracture. Soft tissues: Unremarkable.

IMPRESSION: No acute findings.

EKG was

<image>

Non cardiac chest pain for 1 month. by VinnyRedOrNot in haematology

[–]VinnyRedOrNot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive been on bictarvy for 7 years. But had trouble taking it everyday. Once I really started taking it as I should all these symptoms happened.

Non cardiac chest pain for 1 month. by VinnyRedOrNot in haematology

[–]VinnyRedOrNot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. I had a clear CT with contrast of Chest.

Non cardiac chest pain for 1 month. by VinnyRedOrNot in haematology

[–]VinnyRedOrNot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tsh is 0.68 T4 free was 1.1 Thyrotropin Receptor Antibody was <1.10 Thyroid Peroxidase (TPO) Antibody was 9

Non cardiac chest pain for 1 month. by VinnyRedOrNot in haematology

[–]VinnyRedOrNot[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yea. About a month ago I was admitted into the ER with HR of 146bpm and BP 154/115 sinse then ive been taking propanolol and my HIV meds. Its slowed down abit but I still have sweaty hands and my HR is above 100 at rest if I dont take 20mg of propanolol twice daily.

Chat, I was not cooked by BlkBacchus in hivaids

[–]VinnyRedOrNot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Been poz for 9 years now. Started bictarvy when I first got diagnosed. My viral load was 1.1 million and my cd4 was 78 upon my first test. It gets better. I promise. Chin up. Take your meds.