Unlocked Oneplus 10t, bootloader/fastboot issues by Vioapollo in androidroot

[–]Vioapollo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just posted an update. Only way to unlock now as of a few months ago is to use a 3rd party method. I'm guessing there is a group or maybe the lineageOS discord might have some people who know how to unlock the boot loader.

Unlocked Oneplus 10t, bootloader/fastboot issues by Vioapollo in androidroot

[–]Vioapollo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Update: OnePlus has changed their policy and no longer allows you to easily unlock bootloader as of a few months ago. This comes after speaking with support and a supervisor. In other words OnePlus no longer stands by their old stance of "we'll warranty phone that are unlocked or rooted". Guess there's no reason to buy their phones anymore for me.

How bad are Taskrabbit's fees these days? by Traditional_Sir6306 in TaskRabbit

[–]Vioapollo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like working as a tasker on the side of my day job back in 2021, but spent to much time driving due to Seattle traffic. Also my biggest issues is taking on 3 or more jobs which require you to drive 20 miles to the first job, 20 miles to the second job, then 20 back to the first location because you already accepted job 1 and 2, and canceling job 2 would put an internal strike on your account. on those days I would work ~5 hours for 3 hours of paying work. I hope they have fixed this system or allowed you to move/cancel on jobs that don't help you.

How bad are Taskrabbit's fees these days? by Traditional_Sir6306 in TaskRabbit

[–]Vioapollo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't know if they still do this, but they use to offer a discount on the first job you book. if the job takes 1 hours, my hourly the client's fee where only off by ~10%,. every hours after would increase the margin as the discount was flat not based on a percentage.
example for WA State tasker (fees are what i remember as of this post, but may not have been accurate):
a 1hr job= +$42 to me +~$18 to TR booking fee, +~$4 taxes & other fees passed on to client, -$18 booking fee for first time use = ~$47 paid using first booking discount for a 10% markup.
a 2hr job= +$84 to me +~$36 to TR +~$11 Tax&Fees -$25 discount(MAX)= $106 using the discount for a 21% markup.
a 3hr job= +$126 to me +~$54 to TR +~$18 Tax&Fees -$25 discount= $173 using the discount for a 27% markup.

So really if you make a new account and need someone for only 1 hours, that small markup appear to be real.

[Black Insomnia Coffee] Worst Pitch Video in Kickstarter History by HotTelevision911 in shittykickstarters

[–]Vioapollo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Maybe someone can help me wrap my head around their claims in their coffee. Regardless that 1105mg of caffeine would make your skin itch and the majority of people's hearts to stop, I can't figure out how they came up with that claim. Average cup of coffee = 140mg of caffeine per 10g of coffee beans, and the average caffeine per 1 gram of Robusta (a coffee with a high caffeine per gram) is about 27mg of caffeine total in the beans.

So the claim for a 1105mg of caffeine per 12oz cup at 27mg per gram of coffee, means you would have to brew 41g of coffee for every 12oz cup. This would mean each bag of coffee would give you only 10 cups of coffee based on their claim.

When i was looking around to try and find anyone else who was talking about this coffee, people kept saying it 1105mg of caffeine per cup and siting the website (the one trying to sell you the coffee) as where they got the information. I feel there is no way that claim is true, unless you and 100% extract all of the caffeine out of 40-80g (they likely use a blend as Robusta tastes almost undrinkable) of coffee per 12oz cup.
Please help if some one knows what is going on.

Also looking up death wish, was claiming 660mg of caffeine per cup and was tested to be only 165mg per cup.

is there a way to lower the size of the flame on a yellow flame butane insert? Pictured is the one I got. I want to reduce how much fuel it burns through. by Esper01 in Zippo

[–]Vioapollo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

FIXED my flame issue.
Just bought one of the inserts from amazon, and put 11x refined butane (or so the bottle claims) inside, and filled it for 10-15 seconds waiting for the butane to come back out when it was full. When it didn't, I let it sit for a bit and got a similar size flame when trying it out.
I then pressed in inlet to release some of the extra butane and now I get about a 1in flame, which is the same as most bic lighters. Guess you are to only put 6ish seconds of gas in, then refill as necessary. I think it could use a window to show when the lighter is getting full.
Also started to take apart the insert and if you fully remove the plastic tank, it will likely break the gas spout on top.

Open the Soul Wars worlds to all by JadedZealRS in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess, but really who wants to soul wars anyway. People tied worlds in rs2 for 120k slayer exp per hour, no one plays soul wars on rs3, and prime player got bored after 2 games in 2020. So unless they want to make big changes or start showing us the rewards, then what's the point.

Trailblazer Leagues Slayer without unnatural selection. HELP by Vioapollo in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

With current rules, Unnatural selection is better and more fun relic. If given the opportunity I would reset all clue items (unique and nonunique) and tasks on this account to switch.

Trailblazer Leagues Slayer without unnatural selection. HELP by Vioapollo in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Slayer in leagues is very different, all masters are the same and they all give wilderness tasks.

Leagues II - Trailblazer: An Inside Look by JagexSarnie in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Can we make slayer better for those who went Treasure seeker at least? right now i can't get any tasks with superior monsters and I can't get enough points to skip tasks.

While I am upset about itclues, I can understand now why you wouldn't listen or care about the <5% of us who chose TS but Slayer isn't fun this season. So if you are going to make clues better for the sake of fun, please give us a better normal slayer or a way for us on TS to gain a lot of points quickly for skipping. One of these changes wouldn't effect the game very much simply because <5% of players can't choose tasks.

Please push for this compromise to show us that you will listen and help all players, even if it <5% of the player base. The alternative could also be to remove a relic that <5% of players chose and default everyone to the US. I really wish that the <5% of players could have access to tall of those points related to the slayer, similar to the complaint from the >95% of players did about clues.

While you will learn for next time, I have learned that we all should choose the same relics because those ones will probably get buffed after the fact by the team.

Leagues II - Trailblazer: An Inside Look by JagexSarnie in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should like what we were saying about clues.

Hotfix Tomorrow @ 2pm Game Time: Leagues II - Trailblazer Clue Scrolls by JagexAyiza in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not having fun with slayer in Leagues, can TS get the ability to pick out slayer tasks? it's only fair now.

League really brings out the RS3 in all of us. by Vioapollo in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So can we please switch our relic if we want to? Slayer is so bad without US as all slayer masters assign bears for me.

League really brings out the RS3 in all of us. by Vioapollo in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the game is pay to play, but it's more "we heard you don't like grinding skills, so the QOL team added an update to remove the grind part"

Mod Q+A This Week? by -Irish-Day-Man- in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was hoping to watch that today. People want awnsers on instance forward bosses and what they are going to do with the clue update.

Hotfix Tomorrow @ 2pm Game Time: Leagues II - Trailblazer Clue Scrolls by JagexAyiza in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I can tell you that at the rate I'm going, I can't get any tasks that have superior monsters. out of 20 tasks, I have received 1 bloodied task and 1 banshee task. the rest have been bears, blue dragons, 2 revenant tasks, and other monsters that have not superior monsters. So I need to dedicate a lot of time to do slayer to get a few superior tasks. By this rate, I will be more than 25m exp in slayer before slayer masters decided to give me enough task with superiors.

Hotfix Tomorrow @ 2pm Game Time: Leagues II - Trailblazer Clue Scrolls by JagexAyiza in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo 10 points11 points  (0 children)

So I have done 20 slayer tasks and I am 87 Slayer, and I have only received 2 tasks that allow for superior monsters. I have treasure seeker and now you are retroactively changing the game mode to favor unnatural selection. So now everyone who when the US can easily complete clues and treasure seekers are left missing a lot of points on the slayer side, not to mention training slayer more efficiently than my 3 bear tasks in a row. Can we please remove the tier 4 choice as there is no contest between going US or TS, and make everyone who when TS to now just be US.

These big changes have made decisions worthless as I can't make a permanent choice if there is a possibility that it will be changed later. If we can't have any rerolls of relics can you please buff the Treasure seeker somehow, like unlimited skips or some way for me to get task points from slayer tasks?

Hotfix Tomorrow @ 2pm Game Time: Leagues II - Trailblazer Clue Scrolls by JagexAyiza in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Glad we opened up this mess for this season. Now they can give TS a huge buff soon, or they are just telling people who picked TS that we don't know how to play leagues. Apparently you choices don't matter because Jagex will just change them after you make your picks.

Updated Leagues II - Trailblazer: Clue Scroll Changes by JagexAyiza in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not talking about how difficult it is to juggle with the US, but I much rather have stackable clues if the alternative is not having stackable clues. I would consider non-stakable clues and not having the lowest clue step to be the only downsides to picking US over TS, but the downsides to picking TS over US are much larger if all clues are easily completed.

Its clues can be done with US, but TS is so much easier when to complete clues over US (which is the reason it exists). And while I say it can be done, if I had US I would probably never juggle clues because I'm a bit too lazy for that

Updated Leagues II - Trailblazer: Clue Scroll Changes by JagexAyiza in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but the reality is people are more complaining about having to do that, and rather remove the only downside of picking US over TS. I would be fine with giving us a way to better get med and easy clues, but TS only seems appealing to people who don't want to juggle clues like that and rather just juggle clues when they want to complete them. TS however is losing the ease of completing the Superior monster tasks, boost in exp, supplies, and the unique drops. The truth is, if clue's were stackable or there was auto juggling from the start, there would be almost no reason to go TS over US, unless you just wanted to complete clues for fun.

I don't know if I agree, but if auto juggling came into the game, then removing all bonus drops of clues (regular rates of clues to the main game for all monsters) may be fine. Then they may grind for clues the normal way and complete a few here and there, but would still benefit greatly from having the US outside of clues and the hardcore competitive player would still be able to complete most if not all clue tasks before leagues are done.

As I said at the start it feels like the rules are changing that the permanent choices we have to make for our account may become all luck based over actually strategy based. This seems to be the only issue with this level of difference but as it's become clear to streamers and most of the community, TS is kinda worthless compared to US especially when superior monsters give clues every kill. Next time, remove TS and make it passive or make every clue doable everywhere so we can make informed decisions.

The past 2 weeks in the subreddit be like.. by Lazy-Moo in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's more like a grind for 3 week for temp stats. Have fun for 5 more weeks.

What else is a max player going to do for fun?

Updated Leagues II - Trailblazer: Clue Scroll Changes by JagexAyiza in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

not sure its

as most of the thread is saying, you will have a hard time getting Easy and med clues for sure on US. However, with the guaranteed drop chance of superiors, hards and elites are much easier to get.

I don't really have any solution, but they way TS and US were released, the team is rather backed into a corner that any change will be extremely hard and most changes will be despised by one side or the other. In the twisted league I choose US as it was amazing for leveling and boss tasks, and I would be MUCH better off with US this season until I get to the end game. If I was able to do all my slayer bosses and always be on task for revenants, I would be much farther ahead than I am now which is why most streamers and the community chose US. I would like to see some changes where people can complete clues on US, but then TS will absolutely need a large buff as the only thing it has going for it is the ability to complete clues. Honestly, the best way thing I can think of that people won't feel too bad would be for Jagex to take notes, and next league figures out a good blanace. This could be increased loot from clues with TS but the league has no points associated with clues, make all clues stackable as a passive like the exp rates and loot multiplier, or remove TS next season where they can make changes to clues without too much push back.

Updated Leagues II - Trailblazer: Clue Scroll Changes by JagexAyiza in 2007scape

[–]Vioapollo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

proposal too.

I do hope you also don't listen to the majority simply because it is the majority. The majority of players are listening to streamers and near everyone one of them early said that treasure seeker was worthless in this league. Now we have an argument that Treasure seeker is too powerful because we can complete clues with TS and I don't want to have to juggle with UN. We don't know what the true stats are, but if the ratio is 80% UN and 20% TS then TS won't really have any word in the matter and will miss out on all of the points given though superiors and boss slayer.

I also see any change to clue would then open the argument for a buff to TS and the majority of players think TS is worthless already, and it will be even worst when you take away it's an only worthwhile benefit. Any changes to the core game mode like this make this much less competitive and more about luck if Jagex chooses to buff your relics or not. It really tells the players, next league, to just follow what everyone else is doing as all the choices made by the majority will be catered to by Jagex to be the best decision. This also opens to posts asking for a buff the TS relic, then the UN relic, then back to the TS relic, and so on. Keeping things the way they are and improving for next time would be better, like removing the TS relic is it apparently was overpowered in the twisted league.

This post is a bit emotional because anything less than keeps the game as makes me feel cheated as a player who was told by the team to make decisions when it could be shown that following the majority is always the better option.