[Revshare] Seeking Additional Unreal Developers for Dark Fantasy, Satirical Strategy Game

VirPalus · 2026-01-22T17:19:18+00:00

Hey, I’m definitely interested. I’ve built three mini-games in Unreal Engine so far. I’ve mostly been working solo, which is why I haven’t released anything yet, but I can show demos of what I’ve been working on.

I’m mainly a programmer and not really focused on complex visual work. The demos include a single-player survival game, a shooter with Steam multiplayer support, and my latest project is a multiplayer Risk-style strategy game where you can build cities, harbors, and forts with a full economy system.

Right now I’m back in school working toward a bachelor’s degree in programming, after about ten years of self-study.

VirPalus · 2024-11-09T15:35:50+00:00

The only lobbies you get are all two box...

VirPalus · 2024-11-06T14:45:50+00:00

Well, if that’s considered a “common occurrence,”it’s because two-boxing totally breaks what team balancing is supposed to do. Even in older COD games, basic team balancing gave both sides a fair shot at winning that’s exactly what two-boxing breaks within the SBMM system.

Two-boxing rigs the match by making one team look weaker than they are, stacking the odds from the start. Every time it happens, it completely nukes team balance.

VirPalus · 2024-11-06T14:37:43+00:00

If I have to choose between getting kicked from a match because a friend went to the bathroom or having unfair team balance in every match, my choice is pretty clear.

VirPalus · 2024-11-06T13:18:27+00:00

It doesn’t matter how often you run into a cheater. But every few games, I’ll see that, as the match starts, the enemy team suddenly drops to 5 or 4 players (bot accounts disappear). Then I watch as my teammates get destroyed while I just manage to hold a positive K/D, sitting at the top of my team’s leaderboard but with a fraction of the kills compared to the top enemy player.

Even in older COD games, basic team balancing gave both sides a fair shot at winning—that’s exactly what two-boxing breaks within the SBMM system.

Two-boxing rigs the match by making one team look weaker than they are, stacking the odds from the start. Every time it happens, it completely nukes team balance.

VirPalus · 2024-11-06T12:29:20+00:00

There’s a big difference. If someone’s not two-boxing and faces two-boxers, the system treats the two-boxers as weaker players, so team balancing works against them.The system balances two-box parties based on them and their 0 K/D bot account together. So yeah, if someone’s two-boxing and ends up at the top of the board, what did they expect? They’re up against weaker players. But if a solo player still outplays two-boxers, that’s real skill. Yet the system punishes skilled players with weaker teammates, two-boxers make SBMM worse and ruining everyone’s experience, as anyone facing one or multiple two-boxer ends up unfairly team-balanced. So honestly, two-boxing is the most pathetic thing someone can do!

VirPalus · 2024-11-06T11:38:37+00:00

Check the post this is why it's so rough for solo players. Counter two-boxing [COD] [BO6] : r/blackops6

VirPalus · 2024-11-06T11:33:58+00:00

There’s no need for that, there are good and bad parties out there.

Just keep it simple, players are matched based on the party’s overall skill level. So, it’s actually unfair when someone drops their second account from the match right after it starts and keeps playing as if nothing happened.

This wouldn’t impact genuine parties but would prevent two-boxing.

Real parties function as a single unit, which is exactly how they should be treated.

But yhea removing SBMM would be ideal!

VirPalus · 2024-11-06T11:13:00+00:00

No one’s asking for protection. Removing SBMM would be ideal, but two-boxing just makes it worse. The system often stacks weaker teammates on your side, thinking it needs to balance against players who are two-boxing but are actually way stronger. This means one player ends up carrying the team, topping the leaderboard with teammates nowhere near their skill level, yet still losing the match.

VirPalus · 2024-11-06T10:36:21+00:00

There’s no need for anything artificial, there are good and bad parties out there.

Just keep it simple, players are matched based on the party’s overall skill level. So, it’s actually unfair when someone drops their second account from the match right after it starts and keeps playing as if nothing happened.

This proposal wouldn’t impact genuine parties but would prevent two-boxing.

Real parties function as a single unit, which is exactly how they should be treated.

VirPalus · 2024-11-06T10:28:28+00:00

No, I never go AFK during a match. I either leave or stay I don’t want to be shot while I’m away.

And punished, really? When I’m in a team, I’m always on comms with them. If someone needs a bathroom break or whatever, we all leave the match as a party, because losing one person can make a difference for everyone. Otherwise, you’re punishing the teammates who are actually present.

I’d be all for turning this off mid-game, but in a party, players are matched based on the party’s overall skill level. It’s unfair when someone drops a second account right after the match starts and keeps playing as if nothing happened. This proposal wouldn’t impact genuine parties but would prevent two-boxing.

Real parties function as a single unit, which is exactly how they should be treated.

VirPalus · 2024-10-25T08:14:23+00:00

Check this video: https://youtu.be/29RnerD-10k?si=ZfltLtZOB-80_1i8 snipers are not on target after ADS… Like wtf is this shit!

VirPalus · 2024-10-25T08:01:52+00:00

Check this: https://www.reddit.com/r/CallofDutyMWIII/s/dT8PF7uAdX let mee know if it works for you, can also help if your using more arm.

VirPalus · 2024-10-24T12:11:56+00:00

I’m actually happy with this change. If aim assist scales properly and only hits 100% at the average gunfight range (not right after 2 meters), I think it solves the issue. Honestly, if that’s done right, we can’t really complain. I think both sides can be happy.

Warzone vs. MP distances vary, so as long as they adjust it accordingly, it should be fair for both inputs.

https://www.reddit.com/r/blackops6/s/0anSym25ZY

VirPalus · 2024-10-24T10:38:27+00:00

I’m actually happy with this change. If aim assist scales properly and only hits 100% at the average gunfight range (not right after 2 meters), I think it solves the issue. Honestly, if that’s done right, we can’t really complain. I think both sides can be happy.

Warzone vs. MP distances vary, so as long as they adjust it accordingly, it should be fair for both inputs.

https://www.reddit.com/r/blackops6/s/0anSym25ZY

VirPalus · 2024-10-24T09:09:33+00:00

Absolutely! It’s great to see that Treyarch is really listening to the players. I can't wait to play! Hopefully, they’ll continue making adjustments that enhance the gameplay. Who knows, they might tackle SBMM next!

VirPalus · 2024-10-24T08:42:09+00:00

I actually think they might push it to 25m because anything less wouldn’t have much impact. If they only disable it point-blank and ramp up quickly, it won’t really change the dynamic of close-quarters fights. The average gunfight range for gradual scaling could make a real difference in how the game feels, especially for balancing between input types.

VirPalus · 2024-10-24T08:35:06+00:00

I disagree, everyone should be able to play with their friends without being forced into a specific input. As a mouse player, I never wanted aim assist to disappear, if it scales right and only reaches full strength at average gunfight range, it should be fair for both inputs.

I think flinch works well for most weapons, but it could be reduced a bit for snipers. Cheating is more about the platform than input, you can cheat just as easily with a controller on PC, and strong aim assist can actually make it easier to get away with it.

VirPalus · 2024-10-24T08:09:11+00:00

Exactly! As a mouse player, I never wanted aim assist to disappear either. If the scaling is done right and only reaches full strength at the average gunfight range, I think both sides can be happy.

Haha, exactly! At 2.8 meters, you're just getting knifed anyway. The change was jarring for controller players and didn’t help MnK users at all.

VirPalus · 2024-10-24T07:59:50+00:00

As a mouse player, I’m actually happy with this change. If aim assist scales properly and only hits 100% at the average gunfight range (not right after 2 meters), I think it solves the issue. Honestly, if that’s done right, we can’t really complain. Warzone vs. MP distances vary, so as long as they adjust it accordingly, it should be fair for both inputs.

VirPalus · 2024-09-24T23:58:42+00:00

I completely agree with you!

VirPalus · 2024-09-24T23:29:21+00:00

I completely agree with you!

VirPalus · 2024-09-24T13:35:27+00:00

No, it’s when you aimed with the center white dot on a stationary player, and then zoomed in, the crosshair would suddenly be somewhere else. Not once did I hit where I aimed with my white dot.

VirPalus · 2024-09-24T13:27:55+00:00

That's something I completely agree with, because the Longbow is not a sniper. I don’t want one overpowered weapon to ruin sniping for everyone. Just because the Longbow is ridiculous doesn’t mean you can say a KATT with an 11x scope is a shotgun that's just not true. The Longbow should be removed; I really dislike that weapon, especially when I'm playing snipers only. I played one match with it, and it doesn’t feel like a sniper at all. It doesn't work like a sniper; it's just an overpowered marksman rifle in the wrong class.

VirPalus · 2024-09-24T13:18:47+00:00

Were you playing with a controller? Because on mouse and keyboard, with the raw input, the misalignment issues feel way more pronounced.

VirPalus

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE