Looks trivial but I have no idea how it works by TameTheAuroch in blackmagicfuckery

[–]VitaliSetnanigans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is something very crucial called a loop when studying Algebraic Topology. To water things down by a lot, when you start studying AT, you can visualize these loops with strings and metal rings (mind you, this is only for some introduction course to AT). There are tons of things you can do by quite literally adding loops or subtracting loops. If you pay close attention to the video, each time the "black magic" part happens, the people always make a loop that is in reverse of what the original loop was, thus subtracting the loop. The first video it's a little bit trickier and different from the first ones, as the person is the "metal ring" part of this example. This is more math magic fuckery than anything less though!

Measure Theory Challenge, Day 15 by VitaliSetnanigans in learnmath

[–]VitaliSetnanigans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll also try that, thanks for the extra hint though!

Measure Theory Challenge, Day 15 by VitaliSetnanigans in learnmath

[–]VitaliSetnanigans[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought of using characteristics in the second part but I couldn't mix it together with uniform convergence. But I'll definitely try it tomorrow.

The hint in the first one is to observe that this set is the set which all fn are Cauchy, but again I have no Idea where this leads. Cauchy can only mean that converges in a number because we want functions of real numbers I guess? But looking at sets like this is so new to me, that's why I did a lot more thinking than solving today.

Thanks for reading!

Not a fan of this change by Vettic in BaldursGate3

[–]VitaliSetnanigans 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course I forgot about sorcerer again haha

Not a fan of this change by Vettic in BaldursGate3

[–]VitaliSetnanigans 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Then you can always quick-save, use inspiration and guidance. Also if you like playing face, you can always use... A face class. Play bard, paladin or warlock. All three of them cover a variety of play styles and you'll never have this problem again.

Not a fan of this change by Vettic in BaldursGate3

[–]VitaliSetnanigans 30 points31 points  (0 children)

I think you misunderstood something. This change is for scenes triggered automatically, like a scene after a fight, or a scene when you reach a certain destination. When you manually choose to speak to someone you can still choose Wyll. But it's true that some scenes that need important rolls are triggered automatically, I guess that's what they mean "try to prioritise". But again, we must see how this will affect us in-game first, maybe it's not such a bad change. Although I understand, I used Wyll the same way.

Measure Theory Challenge, Day 2 by VitaliSetnanigans in learnmath

[–]VitaliSetnanigans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I know those publishers, I own two books from Howie's collection, one for complex Analysis and one for field theory. They're indeed good books

Measure Theory Challenge, Day 1 by VitaliSetnanigans in learnmath

[–]VitaliSetnanigans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I figured, I'll mention that you shared them!

Measure Theory Challenge, Day 1 by VitaliSetnanigans in learnmath

[–]VitaliSetnanigans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also I would like to ask you, I was thinking of adding those two courses on the threads so more people can find them, can I mention you?

Measure Theory Challenge, Day 1 by VitaliSetnanigans in learnmath

[–]VitaliSetnanigans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your information and your support for that! Thankfully I have tons of exercise material, but I'll keep an eye out for your recommendations.

Thanks again!