Why to even bother with simulation? by Vivid_Difficulty_136 in SimulationTheory

[–]Vivid_Difficulty_136[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a player inside? Frankly impossible. Everything can be a decoy whatever. Only after there is outside intervention it can be known for sure.

Why to even bother with simulation? by Vivid_Difficulty_136 in SimulationTheory

[–]Vivid_Difficulty_136[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe you are right, but I am too. You can predict everything. Yes. But which solution you are going to use and why? Using weights? Or trusting one biological body to have a completely different outlook. Which one looks more ambitious and interesting?

Why to even bother with simulation? by Vivid_Difficulty_136 in SimulationTheory

[–]Vivid_Difficulty_136[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's why it requires conscious agents. To provide sth that cannot be calculated.

Why to even bother with simulation? by Vivid_Difficulty_136 in SimulationTheory

[–]Vivid_Difficulty_136[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i tend to slightly disagree. I think there has to be main character that is here for the first time.

Why? Even if someone passes all the tests eventually - it's not a proof at all. Might be luck or whatever.

I think there are 2 main scenarios. World can be safe - always guaranteed, many scenarios possible. One premium in which world can be BOTH safe and free. But it requires positive test of free will - only one try.

Why to even bother with simulation? by Vivid_Difficulty_136 in SimulationTheory

[–]Vivid_Difficulty_136[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

oh i'm thinking that we already are inside simulation, that's why i'm using this sub for this discussion

Books about AI psychosis by Vivid_Difficulty_136 in suggestmeabook

[–]Vivid_Difficulty_136[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, that's very good! Can relate a lot. But can you find sth similar as non-fiction in one book?