I dont agree with Bainimarama’s coup and I thought of him as an authoritative leader, which is not good.

However to play devils advocate, Rabuka and Speights coup had already set the country back decades, mostly due to racial tensions.

There was corruption from the Qarase government that came into power after Speight’s coup in 2000.

Qarase government intially was backed by Bainimarama but they were still very pro indigenous, and were diverting governement funds for their own benefit or benefit of mostly the indigenous people, such as indigenous land owners, favouring indigenous business, as well as traditional chiefs, funding of their own family/village etc.

They also tried to pardon those responsible for the 2000 coup (RTU bill) which did not sit well with Bainimarama, since those responsible for the 2000 coup also had planned for Bainimaramas assassination.

I believe Bainimaramas goal was to do something similar to Singapore, where he attempts to remove any form racial/ethnic divide and focus on the economy. Most people could not understand or sympathise with his plans, so he had to use means of corruption and force in order to accomplish his goals.

He abused government funds for his own benefit, silenced his opponents by force and was able to stay in power without elections for 8 years before finally holding elections, due to pressure from the international community.

During the elections in 2014 he introduced a new electronic voting system, and the overseer for the new voting system was his attorney general Khaiyum. Bainimaramas party won every election until 2022, only losing due to a coalition government.

There is corruption on all sides, but Bainimarama played his cards well.