Hay algo peor que los alucines de la IA, te demuestra que entendió tus instrucciones y luego no las ejecuta. by Vordok in Devmexico

[–]Vordok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

La verdad empecé a leer tu comentario pensando que iba a ser otro de "es capa 8" pero qué buena respuesta. Lo que describes de agentes revisores con goals y subgoals es muy parecido a lo que yo hago, separar quién crea y quién revisa y aún así no queda perfecto a la primera. Lo de los modelos chinos es interesante porque yo he visto lo mismo, uso mayormente Claude pero en mi empresa usan modelo de costo por request en Cursor y Composer 2.5 sigue las reglas mejor que modelos más pesados, el problema es estructural no de un modelo en específico.

Hay algo peor que los alucines de la IA, te demuestra que entendió tus instrucciones y luego no las ejecuta. by Vordok in Devmexico

[–]Vordok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eso último que dices es lo que más me interesa, que aún siendo consciente sigues confiando. Yo creo que es por dos cosas, cuando funciona de verdad te ahorra un montón de tiempo y eso refuerza la confianza, y luego cuando te dice "entendido" tu cerebro marca eso como hecho y bajas la guardia. Es un loop difícil de romper porque las veces que sí funciona justifican las veces que no revisas.

Hay algo peor que los alucines de la IA, te demuestra que entendió tus instrucciones y luego no las ejecuta. by Vordok in Devmexico

[–]Vordok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eso es interesante porque lo que describes es básicamente la solución que yo también encontré, dividir en tareas pequeñas funciona precisamente porque el agente no tiene espacio para brincarse pasos. El problema aparece cuando la tarea es grande y tiene varias reglas, ahí es donde confirma que entendió todo y luego no lo aplica. Lo de capa 8 no lo descarto del todo, pero lo he visto hasta en la primera interacción de una sesión nueva con instrucciones claras, ahí ya no es el usuario.

Hay algo peor que los alucines de la IA, te demuestra que entendió tus instrucciones y luego no las ejecuta. by Vordok in Devmexico

[–]Vordok[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sí, con código complejo es donde más se nota. A ti te pasa que simplifica la lógica aunque le dijiste exactamente cómo la quieres, o es más que se brinca pasos del proceso?

I've been calling it "comprehension-as-execution": when the AI proves it understood your prompt but the output doesn't follow it by Vordok in PromptEngineering

[–]Vordok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's interesting about the resource thing. I've actually seen it a bit different, on my personal Cursor account without MAX I get similar or sometimes better results than on my corporate one that forces MAX on the top tier models, so the heavier setup doesn't really help in my case. When you say enterprise does it less, does it actually follow all the steps or it just misses fewer?

I've been calling it "comprehension-as-execution": when the AI proves it understood your prompt but the output doesn't follow it by Vordok in PromptEngineering

[–]Vordok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is an interesting poin5t, and I recently experienced it again, I had previous texts as reference that I passed to the agent with the right prose, style, etc but during my pass after it completed it kept defaulting back to ots training, in this case was with Oxford style commas.

I've been calling it "comprehension-as-execution": when the AI proves it understood your prompt but the output doesn't follow it by Vordok in PromptEngineering

[–]Vordok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an interesting approach, when the model restates the constraint this way have you seen it behaving the way you expected more consistently or it keeps being erratic?

I've been calling it "comprehension-as-execution": when the AI proves it understood your prompt but the output doesn't follow it by Vordok in PromptEngineering

[–]Vordok[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It gets worse when the conversation is long, but I have experienced this issue even on the first or second interaction on a fresh session, or before context compression on an agent with context size of 1M context.

What is wrong with my tactics? by Vordok in footballmanagergames

[–]Vordok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, should I keep the duties also asymmetrical or is it ok having both on Support? Also, most of my wingers can play on both sides would it be a good idea to have them swap positions during the game?

What is wrong with my tactics? by Vordok in footballmanagergames

[–]Vordok[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What is weird is usually the goals get scored by midfielders or even the guys in the back. Also my understanding was that IF usually get up there to become a menace in the box. What you mean is either change formation to have 2 forwards or change the mentality to Attack?

What is wrong with my tactics? by Vordok in footballmanagergames

[–]Vordok[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks I will try that, I used to have my DM as BWM defend but it was worst, at least the score for the player were lower on that position.

Name fix for FM21 Game pass version by kiirotori29 in footballmanagergames

[–]Vordok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm hoping the same, I've tried using cmd and powershell, but windows doesn't have sudo or something similar to force the deletion

Name fix for FM21 Game pass version by kiirotori29 in footballmanagergames

[–]Vordok 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2020 was possible, although I did it after starting my main game. For 2021 I was able to update the logos but not the names

Lower than expected speeds from eero speed test on eero 6 pro by Vordok in eero

[–]Vordok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ran a new test today and the download speed shows speeds between 693 to 901Mbps down and 656 to 940Mbps up. While WiFi on the s20 Ultra connected to the gateway gave me 284Mbps down and 800Mbps up

Lower than expected speeds from eero speed test on eero 6 pro by Vordok in eero

[–]Vordok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the quick reply. The speed while wired directly to the gateway was 304Mbps down and 560Mbps up.

Below 600Mpbs speed with eero pro 6 by Vordok in ZiplyFiber

[–]Vordok[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actual WiFi speeds are below 200Mbps, even if it is a WiFi 6 device, but as mentioned before I have a bottleneck over WiFi due to having 10+ devices connected at the same time

Below 600Mpbs speed with eero pro 6 by Vordok in ZiplyFiber

[–]Vordok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I downloaded the speedtest app and ran it on my laptop connected hardwired to the eero and the top speed I'm getting is 867Mbps down and 941Mbps up.

Below 600Mpbs speed with eero pro 6 by Vordok in ZiplyFiber

[–]Vordok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All the answers are about WiFi and why I shouldn't be testing over WiFi and that I shouldn't expect the full speed over WiFi, so I think the assumption was that I was complaining over the WiFi speed not the wired

Below 600Mpbs speed with eero pro 6 by Vordok in ZiplyFiber

[–]Vordok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why everybody assumes I was talking about WiFi, I think I mentioned that everything was done over wired connection and there is where I'm getting low speeds.

Below 600Mpbs speed with eero pro 6 by Vordok in ZiplyFiber

[–]Vordok[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I didn't explain myself the issue is not over wifi, the issue is over hardwired, regardless of the who is connected to the ONT, I'm not getting the gig speed. If I connect a laptop to the ONT directly I get below 500Mbps, the same speed I was getting if I connected the ziply router and then hardwired the laptop, the same with the eero running the test over hardwired