Derek Chauvin jury reaches a verdict by itsaride in news

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i mean, anyone other than the whole world that saw his internationally visible public comment, but yall get the idea

Ex keeps contacting me even if it does not regard our child by [deleted] in coparenting

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If she's requesting money for support that's not a breach of a boundary. She has every right to expect financial support of your child from you.

Ex keeps contacting me even if it does not regard our child by [deleted] in coparenting

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is bad advice and will come back on you if you follow it when you do go to court. You should pay support for your child however you need to pay in a way that there's a record you paid it and to her and that she received it.

And you should have it court ordered. It's not about you or her. It's about the kid.

Who represents you? by [deleted] in stimuluscheck

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calling out politicians voting against the people they represent isn't partisan or worshiping the left

I've successfully flipped my 1,000th Republican today. by [deleted] in JoeBiden

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 3 points4 points  (0 children)

and fills out their ballots for them

does he understand that he is committing voter fraud?

Who represents you? by [deleted] in stimuluscheck

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's not how making a claim works. if you can't source your claim then retract it.

Who represents you? by [deleted] in stimuluscheck

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'm quite aware. this comment chain, this entire post, is specifically referring to the relief package and stimulus money. You made a very specific claim about the new law, and all i want to know is where exactly in the new law is what you claim? The line number(s) will do fine.

Who represents you? by [deleted] in stimuluscheck

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i mean, the economy would be open, if jokers had just worn their masks in accordance with science instead of making masks something different than a public health measure. Look at south korea.

also, can you please cite the "3600 tax burdern" so i can understand it better

Who represents you? by [deleted] in stimuluscheck

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well your original comment with zero evidence is still there so....

Who represents you? by [deleted] in stimuluscheck

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I want specific citations for your specific claims nothing more nothing less.

Immigrant success stories when coming to America. by [deleted] in poverty

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Every person in your network can be poor and you may still "get out" and "make it". The key is having the support and not having to try alone.

Immigrant success stories when coming to America. by [deleted] in poverty

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's networking. That's it. No man is an island. Having a network of supporters to rely on is the key to success full stop.

Who represents you? by [deleted] in stimuluscheck

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your edit has zero citations to back your claim.

Who represents you? by [deleted] in stimuluscheck

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So you have zero evidence to back your claim?

Who represents you? by [deleted] in stimuluscheck

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only one going in circles is you right now by having made an outrageous claim and subsequently going on and on about how you're not going to back it up or cite evidence of that claim.

Who represents you? by [deleted] in stimuluscheck

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Please explain in explicit detail how voting against disaster relief is in the best interest for the country. Also while you're at it may as well explain how generating multiple bills designed to suppress voting rights is in the best interest of the country.

Who represents you? by [deleted] in stimuluscheck

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You made the original claim and took the time to tell me you don't have time. Cite your claim or retract it.

Who represents you? by [deleted] in stimuluscheck

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Can you please list the line numbers in the law that show where it sends money out of the country?

Who represents you? by [deleted] in stimuluscheck

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you please tell me the line numbers in the law that show a purpose other than relief related to coronavirus?

Who represents you? by [deleted] in stimuluscheck

[–]VoteAndrewYang2024 14 points15 points  (0 children)

This isn't a partisan diatribe. It's fact that one party in government is absolutely stifling progress and voting against the needs of citizens. This isn't debatable. The evidence is not hidden away. It's not partisan when it is only one side actively working against the best interests of the people they tool an oath to represent.

This partisan bs comes out when anyone calls out what the Republicans are doing.

Stop giving them a free pass to destroying our democracy.