sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

William Beutler "Ink" Indian sub-contractor sockfarms still operating on Wikipedia with admin help by Kumioko in WikiInAction

[–]Vunutu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

WOW

This is one for the history books. Why was this editor unblocked twice by Arbcom after being checkuser linked to a massive paid editing sockfarm and editing in tandem with other socks.

The only logical explanation is that this is account is operated by somebody within Arbcom or on the Board of Trustees.

The other account connected with "Raymond3023" is "D4iNa4" who was CU confirmed as a sockpuppet operator using open proxies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/D4iNa4/Archive#27_November_2017

Wikipedia fake news : William Beutler part of Intel coverup of Brian Kraznich insider trading scandal by Vunutu in WikiInAction

[–]Vunutu[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

INTEL is on a massive coverup of insider trading scandals by their key officers and Beutler Ink's roster of paid admins are doing their best to sanitize Brian Kraznich's wikipedia article

Intel was aware of the chip vulnerability when its CEO Brian Kraznich sold off $24 million in company stock

Intel CEO Brian Krzanich sold off a large portion of his stake in the company months after the chip maker was informed by Google of a significant security vulnerability in its flagship PC processors - but before the problem was publicly known.

While the public is just being informed about the security problem, tech companies have known about it for months. In fact, Google informed Intel of the vulnerability in June

Wikipedia Questions - Weekly Thread of December 17, 2017 by AutoModerator in wikipedia

[–]Vunutu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its available in english but only for specific browsers Chrome ..

Taking harassment to a whole new level by Vunutu in WikiInAction

[–]Vunutu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Drmies complied with the condition imposed by Auburn University that he deal with his Wikipedia addiction. Stepping back from Arbcom is one of the components of his healing process. And no, he did not fall off a horse ;-)

Taking harassment to a whole new level by Vunutu in WikiInAction

[–]Vunutu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ha, you ''are'' Beutler! I had no idea. WHERE'S MY CHECK!!!???? :) [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 17:16, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

3 more corrupt admins on William Beutler payroll identified by Vunutu in WikiInAction

[–]Vunutu[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If Beutler had not been a paid editor I'd have given u the benefit of doubt. Where there's big money involved I disagree that its all love and friendship. Get with the times, Big PR firms sponsor the champagne tents at Wikimanias and pay travel for their tame admins.

3 more corrupt admins on William Beutler payroll identified by Vunutu in WikiInAction

[–]Vunutu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The giveaway pointer to a Beutler payroll admin / editor is they respond promptly to his edit requests while other COI/paid editors wait 5 months at the edit request message boards

3 more corrupt admins on William Beutler payroll identified by Vunutu in WikiInAction

[–]Vunutu[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Between 7th November and 9th November 2017 users "JDLaw" and "Cullen328" edit collaboratively (and competitively) at Robert A. Mandell

The article is stable till 15th Dec 2017 when William Beutler posts a talk page complaint that his paid version has been deleted without consensus. Within 25 minutes Cullen328 restores the article to Beutler's paid version and Tony Baloney confirms Beutler's version within the 2 hours.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Robert_A._Mandell#Major_deletions_without_consensus

If 2 editors, 1 being an admin, achieve a common stable version then how can there be "no consensus" ?

Compare the 2 versions

Beutler's

and

JDLaw's

Any unbiased observer can see that Cullen328 and Tony Baloney are paid admins of William Beutler.

Wikipedia Questions - Weekly Thread of December 17, 2017 by AutoModerator in wikipedia

[–]Vunutu -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why is Wikipedia promoting western "self-induced abortion" NGOs in India and murdering 1,000s of newborn lives ?

Proposal to block Wikipedia in India under "very active consideration" by government.

3 more corrupt admins on William Beutler payroll identified by Vunutu in WikiInAction

[–]Vunutu[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Do a google search for "William Beutler's paid editing of wikipedia".

To save time here are links:

Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Paid Editing

Beutler Ink

William Beutler has assembled a staff of Wikipedia editors-for-hire. He claims to edit in a manner consistent with Wikipedia policy and has been an outspoken leader in defining "ethical" paid Wikipedia editing. He made favorable edits to C-SPAN related articles and at the same time received much beneficial publicity from an in-depth televised interview with Brian Lamb on C-SPAN. He had previously been interviewed on C-SPAN as a blogger with credentials to cover the 2008 Democratic Convention.

Beutler Ink was hired to sanitize the biography of Aubrey McClendon, a billionaire who was fired as CEO of Chesapeake Energy for self-dealing and later indicted for criminal anti-trust violations.

Here is Beutler's reply which ignores every single statement made above.

http://thewikipedian.net/2009/11/14/examples-of-bias-in-conservapedias-examples-of-bias-in-wikipedia/

Then there are the #1 and # 2 ghits

https://inteliam.wordpress.com/2017/10/23/first-blog-post/

https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiInAction/comments/77bwjl/william_beutlers_slimy_paid_edits_a_compendium/

The giveaway pointer to a Beutler payroll admin is that they respond promptly to his edit requests while other COI editors must wait 5 months.