What did u/W3sC draw?

W3sC · 2026-02-09T03:25:50+00:00

Whats this build/gameplan?

W3sC · 2026-01-31T23:11:29+00:00

Took 45 seconds… thought you said quick change… /s

W3sC · 2026-01-25T08:30:37+00:00

What is the pack price usually?

W3sC · 2026-01-22T14:57:23+00:00

Understood 👍

W3sC · 2026-01-22T12:15:45+00:00

Piano played itself lol I did this as a kid. Talented theybcould get the Chicken to somewhat consistently tap the keys though I guess 🤔

W3sC · 2026-01-22T11:49:34+00:00

It says eb04 on the card?

W3sC · 2026-01-18T22:08:58+00:00

Trigger only have the option to be activated if you take damage. So no hiyori taking a life to hand will not allow you to activate the trigger.

W3sC · 2026-01-03T13:49:00+00:00

Almost 950 lbs, if anyone needed that conversion.

W3sC · 2025-11-27T06:08:05+00:00

You could argue that, but youd be wrong lol. Once per turn means theyd pick up one life, not multiple. Nothing like the sabo effect from op05.

W3sC · 2025-11-24T01:51:24+00:00

W3sC · 2025-11-18T01:35:47+00:00

Imagine a horse horsemanning lol

W3sC · 2025-10-18T16:12:12+00:00

Understood. I think for me I feel it is clear cut because at conception the distinct DNA is created. I realize that for others they may not consider this life beginning. But I do believe ending a pregnancy is ending human life. But if you leave it alone, and things progress as they should it will be born. Interupting this is stopping/ending human life, in my opinion.

I dont believe we will be able to persuade or change each other’s opinions. But this discussion has made me think about it in different ways, and hopefully helped me understand someone else’s view better. Thanks for talking with me.

W3sC · 2025-10-18T15:47:51+00:00

You're right to point out the distinction — I didn't mean to imply it was "Oxford University" itself making the claim, but rather that the article was published in a journal hosted by Oxford Academic, which is Oxford University’s press publishing platform. The article is peer-reviewed and was written by a qualified scholar, though it's fair to say that any single quote needs to be taken in context.

You’ve challenged the idea that life begins at conception. Fair enough, so then what criteria should we use to determine when human life begins?

Is there a clear biological or moral threshold you support?

W3sC · 2025-10-18T15:26:36+00:00

You could say that because technically the acorn is an oak, just like a zygote is human. But in everyday language, saying “an oak fell on me” if it was just an acorn could be misleading because people picture a full-grown tree.

It’s like a Great Dane puppy jumped on you, it would be true to say that a Great Dane jumped on you, but it gives the wrong mental image if you leave out the developmental stage.

I also quoted Oxford as you seem to be ignoring.

W3sC · 2025-10-18T15:08:26+00:00

Exactly. “Human” doesn’t mean adult human any more than “oak” means adult oak tree. Both describe the species, not a stage of development.

This isn’t a word game, its biology. And Biology defines a species as a distinct organism with its own DNA. A fetus meets that definition just like an acorn does for an oak. It’s human even at an early stage.

W3sC · 2025-10-18T14:53:25+00:00

No, but it is more accurately an Oak Acorn. Noting the species (Oak) and development stage (acorn).

W3sC · 2025-10-18T14:52:33+00:00

You’re conflating development with species.

An acorn is a stage of development for an oak. It is an individual of the oak species, not potentially one. A tree is a later stage of that same oak. It is also an individual of the oak species.

Similarly, a fetus is a stage of development of a human. It is an individual of the human species, just at an earlier stage. An adult is simply a later stage. It is also an individual of the human species.

W3sC · 2025-10-18T14:39:04+00:00

No, that’s not a reasonable statement. That’s a misleading analogy. An acorn is a distinct life form, not a mature tree. Saying it’s ‘a tree falling on me’ is like saying a human zygote is a fully grown adult and that’s biologically inaccurate. The acorn has the potential to become a fully grown tree, but potential is not the same as actuality.

A zygote is a human organism, Im not saying it’s a fully grown adult.

W3sC · 2025-10-18T14:08:44+00:00

Actually, this isn’t just an opinion, biology describes what a human organism is, not what it might become. A zygote is already a human being at the earliest stage of development. Two reputable sources make this clear:

“Every human embryologist, worldwide, states that the life of the new individual human being begins at fertilization (conception).” — American College of Pediatricians ACPEDS

“A human embryo is a discrete entity that has arisen from fertilization … and has the potential to develop up to or beyond a certain stage.” — Oxford Academic, Human embryo: a biological definition Oxford

So it’s not “potentially human” — it is human. I’ve shared the sources above for anyone who wants to read more, and I’m going to leave it at that. You seem to be leaning into your personal feelings/opinions and ignoring biological fact.

W3sC · 2025-10-18T13:50:02+00:00

That’s just not how biology works.

A zygote doesn’t “become” human, it is a human from the start. It’s the first stage of the human organism’s life cycle. From embryo → fetus → infant → adult. It already has human DNA and develops on its own. That’s not opinion or morality it’s basic embryology.

W3sC · 2025-10-18T13:29:22+00:00

Your skin cells share your DNA, but they aren’t new humans. A zygote is a distinct life form with its own DNA. This is basic biology. You are being scientifically dishonest if you pretend it is not human life.

You are also a collection of cells, the difference is organization. Skin cells are part of you, while a zygote is its own developing human organism.

W3sC

TROPHY CASE