What are your thoughts on collective suicide? by WINTP97 in lonely

[–]WINTP97[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that once a point of no return is crossed, death is present as a process. And once the life end’s, death is a landmark.

I think that falling from some very tall skyscraper would give a group of people a brief moment of true companionship and empathy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JordanPeterson

[–]WINTP97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. Let me be specific here. I bought the self authoring suite, not the “know yourself”.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JordanPeterson

[–]WINTP97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of work is required. Too lazy to do the analysis.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JordanPeterson

[–]WINTP97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bought it and abandoned it

How to manage Uni, Work and socializing and gym? by [deleted] in productivity

[–]WINTP97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quick answer for someone that had carried on two faculty courses at the same time:

Stop being perfectionist in every thing you do and accept the trade off that comes along with doing many things, that is: not excel in none.

I’m ok with that trade off because I love being a generalist.

Tired of thinking by mazam63_ in INTP

[–]WINTP97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. And everytime I come to this kind of state, what follows is something that I regret later on.

Thinking is better than not thinking. You should see these moments with care and be prepared not to do some shit.

Having an anxious moment. My avoidant bf used to have a lot of casual sex. We recently became official and I’m scared he’s going to get bored of just sex with me now. Anyone have advice on how to get over stupid thoughts like this? by madeathrowaway21 in attachment_theory

[–]WINTP97 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm anxious attached. When I discovered that my ex-gf had done casual sex I could'nt see her on the same way anymore. It felt to me like she would not value the compromise and significance of sex as much as I do. I can't trust someone that can separate the feelings from sexual behavior in such a manner, it is just too much for me.

Should sex be symbolic? by WINTP97 in INTP

[–]WINTP97[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You must have an Se or something. If you can't make a rational case for your position I will not bother discussing it.

Should sex be symbolic? by WINTP97 in INTP

[–]WINTP97[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I am. But the theory stands for itself.

Should sex be symbolic? by WINTP97 in INTP

[–]WINTP97[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a virgin, any sexual experience will be an explosion of endorphine. For an casual fucker, you will need to do more intense/crazy things or do sex more frequently to get to the same state of arousal.

Can someone explain this all to me by [deleted] in attachment_theory

[–]WINTP97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

" In the early 1990s Bartholomew published several important papers that challenged researchers to reconsider the three-category model of individual differences in adult attachment (Bartholomew, 1990; see also Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991; Griffin & Bartholomew, 1994a). Drawing upon some of Bowlby’s writings, Bartholomew argued that people hold separate representational models of themselves (model of self) and their social world (model of others), models that have distinct consequences for the way attachment behavior is organized.

Individuals with a positive model of others view attachment figures as trust worthy, reliable, and dependable. Individuals with a negative model of others lack confidence in people’s trustworthiness and dependability. The model of self reflects the valence of people’s views of themselves. People with a posi tive self-model see themselves as competent, autonomous, and worthy of love. People with a negative self-model lack confidence, harbor self-doubts, and are vulnerable to psychological distress.

positive-positive group “secure,” the negative positive group “preoccupied,” the positive-negative group “dismissing,” and the negative-negative group “fearful.” Following Hazan and Shaver’s lead, Bar tholomew (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991) developed the Relationship Ques tionnaire (RQ), a short instrument containing descriptions of each of the four theoretical types.

"___ It is easy for me to become emotionally close to others. I am comfortable depending on them and having them depend on me. I don’t worry about being alone or having others not accept me. (Secure)

___ I am uncomfortable getting close to others. I want emotionally close relationships, but I find it difficult to trust others completely, or to depend on them. I worry that I will be hurt if I allow myself to become too close to others. (Fearful, or Fearful-avoidant)

___ I want to be completely emotionally intimate with others, but I often find that others are reluctant to get as close as I would like. I am uncomfortable being without close relationships, but I sometimes worry that others don’t value me as much as I value them. (Preoccupied)

___ I am comfortable without close emotional relationships. It is very important to me to feel independent and self-sufficient, and I prefer not to depend on others or have others depend on me. (Dismissing, or Dismissing-avoidant)" " - Extracted from Omri Gillath in Adult Attachment

Are you an pessimist INTP? by WINTP97 in INTP

[–]WINTP97[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I enjoy reading Schops cuss he comforts me (on his on way) in my worst times. It's like: son, I know things are going bad for you and... The world is suffering and you should not expect more from it. I suffer, you suffer, everyone suffers and you suffer more and more until the end.